hich uses a single brand of J2EE servers anyway)
2. automate the upgrading of archives to a new version
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp
Gentoo Counci
documented that well. What we really need is to find what topics people
> are interested in learning more about.
... and document those.
Welcome to the Gentoo Documentation Project.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
Gentoo Do
ocumentation"? Or "installed as dependency of
virtual/logger"?
If the former: hump the GDP.
If the latter: hump the baselayout team.
If both, try humping one of them at a time. Doing both just makes funny
pictures, but doesn't give much results.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeule
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:28PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > If the latter: hump the baselayout team.
>
> What does baselayout have to do with this?
They're to blame for about everything.
Nah, my bad. Of course I meant those responsible for the profiles.
Wkr,
bably make them more open (with a moderation system to check
> message), then they will be used more.
But there is no such system available yet. It is a single commit that gets
transferred to the web site, no moderation possible.
Doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done though.
Wkr,
tramfs and work from there?
I personally have /usr on a separate partition too (using LVM) without an
initramfs or initrd. Works just fine. And I'd like to keep it that way,
since it is simple and very manageable.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
in other locations, like /usr and /var.
How does the tool that creates an initramfs know which files to copy from
/usr and /var anyhow?
Also, how well does this play with all our profiles (so not only the popular
architectures)? What about SELinux and/or grSecurity's RBAC model? Are these
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:42:29PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:06:48PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > That said, I'm a bit hesitant to describing that we "recommend" it
> > regardless of the situation. What is wrong with describing when?
ed recently (last few days) so they should
be okay now. However, some good reviews never hurt.
If you do still find issues, don't hesitate to create a bugreport for it.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
Hi all,
For those using one of the SELinux profiles, sec-policy/selinux-mta will be
masked/removed as its policy is already part of selinux-base-policy
(and as such gives conflicts, cfr bug #384851).
Other people won't notice this as the package is already masked by default.
Wkr,
of the FUD once and for all ;-)
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/gcc-upgrading.xml
t need to reappear again ;-) If you think it is
still unclear or needs improvements left or right, don't hesitate to mail me
or, even better, file a bugreport (I act better on bug reports than on
e-mails).
Oh, and I use a separate /usr with no initramfs (yet), with software raid
and lvm2.
/me quickly hides
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
fficient due to binary package
support requirements.
Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought about
first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of work done. I
also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but that would still be
be
olve it.
> As said by other devs here, I also think it'd be more effective if you
> just do the change yourself. USE="selinux" doesn't affect anything else
> so it's safe.
Ok, no problem. I'll check on IRC regardless, if not just to give a "heads
up" on changes.
Also, my apologies for not sorting the list. Careful readers will notice it
is sorted, but by the package name, not category :/
Thanks you all for the feedback!
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
ne, but also why it is
necessary, how to manage initramfs'es, the concepts underlying, etc.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
the concepts underlying, etc.
>
> Short version: use dracut.
And how does dracut know which files it needs to mount my /usr?
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
have it documented anyhow, and I already notice that many of the
features are already used in #gentoo or gentoo-user@g.o. But there's still a
difference between "not documenting" and putting it in the Gentoo Handbook.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
The first part is about getting a base system. The rest of the
handbook is to describe the Gentoo-specific administrative stuff.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
king the next few days. Once (or when) it does, I'll
submit the necessary patches to wherever is necessary.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:08:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Or will /etc move to /usr too?
> >
> > No, /etc isn't going anywhere.
>
> Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to
> put /etc inside your initrd (since / can't be mounted without it).
> Obviously, y
ures (like additional grSecurity
restrictions or even SELinux) that makes Gentoo Hardened systems less
vulnerable to this specific vulnerability.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
n the wiki as well which might best be aligned
with whatever recommendation is used. See "Beautiful bug reports" [2] and
"Bugzilla HOWTO" [3] as examples.
[2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Beautiful_bug_reports
[3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Bugzilla_HOWTO
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
l we start depending on it (for
instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit
message).
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
n which a certain
problem would already have been implemented. For instance, ebuilds with an
optional python part using the python-r1 eclass. Do you think it is
worthwhile to have a number of packages assigned as good examples?
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
201 - 224 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
