programmer but I want to have a list of those programs, or to
make this list if nobody can provide one.
So please, if you maintain such a program that is linked against the kernel
sources and not against the kernel headers, respond to this mail.
Best,
Dominique
--
Dominique Michel
Mes 3
BTW, alsaplayer is in the proaudio overlay now.
http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
It is 2 versions, a -r5 with the last Debian fixes, and a broken gtk2
cvs version.
Dominique
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:26:56 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abhay Kedia <[E
I am new in this list and waiting at my mentor come back from vacations.
It is often the problem with democracy. Every one will have its word said, even
if he or she know nothing about the issue. What I think is at the only mean to
deal with this problem and still be democratic, is to organize t
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:12:48 -0400
"Stephen P. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Luis Medinas wrote:
> >
> >> If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone
needs
> >> to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete). A few developers on
> >> redhat, mand
isations flags as the vectorisation flags are not
easy to use, because the result depend on the code of the program. They can or
not brake the code, and when the program run well, they can make it faster
or slower. All depend of the size and complexity of the loops. And I think also
of the arch.
So my conclusion is:
For system flags, just keep the default, and if you want to experiment, do
profiling for each single program you want to optimize.
Cheers,
Dominique
--
Dominique Michel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
age 3, when the doc say "a bootable CD
that contains everything you need to get Gentoo Linux up and running."
>
> > At this point though I think using the installer is reasonable enough.
>
> I would agree there.
>
I agree too, but only if it work, and it doesn't completely work for a
networless installation.
--
Dominique Michel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
is not a
science but a belief, it cannot go here. Maybe a herd belief?
--
Dominique Michel
--
N.B.: Tous les emails que je reçois sont filtrés par spamassassin avant de me
parvenir.
Si vous attendez une réponse de ma part et que vous ne la recevez pas, cela
signifie qu'en toute vraisemblance, votre
Le Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:06:28 +0100,
Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've been voicing my concern repeatedly on irc, and I believe that it
> would probably be more effective here.
>
> I believe that the solution of adopting a Code of Conduct, especially in
> this rush
Le Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:22:22 +0200,
"Ioannis Aslanidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On 3/28/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Josh Saddler napsal(a):
> > > I completely disagree with your assessment of the in-kernel hda-intel
> > > state. My workstation uses one of those (labelled n
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:59:25 +0200,
Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote:
> > > It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never
> > > answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored.
> >
> > I
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:26 -0700,
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Steve Dibb wrote:
> > Dominique Michel wrote:
> >
> >> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will
> >> include
> >> both religious and sci
Le Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:16:27 + (UTC),
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
> 14:39:43 +0200:
>
>
> Indeed. That's why while I don't personally agree with the idea of
> genealogy in theolog
Le Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:27:47 + (UTC),
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Dominique Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
> 18:32:50 +0200:
>
> > I disagree. When searching for a software to do a given j
Le Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:25:46 -0700,
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Nathan Smith wrote:
> > On 4/28/07, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Josh Sled wrote:
> >>
> >> > If that's the case, might not "humanities" be a better name?
> >>
> >> s/theology/humanities/ sounds good.
Le Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:06:09 -0400,
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 13:50 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> > On Sunday, 08. July 2007 13:04:24 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> > > What about moving Gentoo stuff to `GPLv3 or later'?
> >
> > I'm strongly opposed
Le Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:39:14 -0700,
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +0200, Dominique Michel wrote:
> >
> > I personally think at gpl-3 is better as gpl-2 because GPLv3 will block
> > tivoization.
>
> Only if the kerne
> Thus the questions of whether many/most individual ebuilds /could/ be
> copyrighted or if so whether it's worth doing so. Certainly, it's the
> tree that contains the license, not the individual ebuilds, etc, which
> give the copyright statement but little more. Gentoo policy would seem
>
> > Can you explain more. If the kernel can be tivoized by someone
>
> I'm sorry, but "tivoized" is not a verb. Please explain what you mean
> by this.
I mean if someone distribute a kernel with a licence that forbid to remove the
functions he added even if we don't want them (as example drm at
18 matches
Mail list logo
