# Hans de Graaff (20 Oct 2013)
# Mask more ruby18-only packages for removal in 30 days.
# All of these packages no longer have dependencies on them.
dev-ruby/amstd
dev-ruby/markaby
dev-ruby/pdf-writer
dev-ruby/ruby-bdb
dev-ruby/semacode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/19/2013 06:43 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:01:44 +0200 Jeroen Roovers
> wrote:
>>
>> As it has been discussed on this mailing list endlessly, there
>> already is a consensus:
>>
>> 1a) you drop the affected keywords, unles
On 10/20/2013 06:18 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 06:43 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> P.S.: It is interesting to see the effects of AutoRepoman beating
>> people to filing bugs, maybe I should write AutoNotifyman as a
>> response to not having the chance to file the bug in a reasonable
>
El sáb, 19-10-2013 a las 10:32 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Well, even if the stabilization is still waiting for two blocking bugs:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474128 -> for Orca 3.8
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486278 -> for getting a lvm2
> version working ok with Sys
Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 12:46:40 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> El sáb, 19-10-2013 a las 10:32 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > Well, even if the stabilization is still waiting for two blocking bugs:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474128 -> for Orca 3.8
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/20/2013 11:40 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
>> The affected packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are
>> totally broken but it's more like of another way to tell you that
>> a few QA problems exist and that it would be nice to fix them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what does the games team think of an official games repository?
These are some arguments for such a repo:
* sunrise does not allow ebuilds when any version is already in the
tree (so no live or beta ebuilds for existing in-tree-games), so that
is not
Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29
hasufell napisał(a):
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
$ layman -i games
* games
* ~
* Source : svn://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/games
* Contact : ga...@gentoo.org
* Type: Subversion; Priority: 50
* Quality : experim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell
> napisał(a):
>
>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>
> $ layman -i games
>
> * games * ~ * Source : svn://overlays.gentoo.
Why not use gamerlay then? :D
20.10.2013, 19:17, "hasufell" :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell
>> napisał(a):
>>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:19 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
> Why not use gamerlay then? :D
>
* not related to the games team
* no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
* low quality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:18:20 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > P.S.: It is interesting to see the effects of AutoRepoman beating
> > people to filing bugs, maybe I should write AutoNotifyman as a
> > response to not having the chance to file the bug
> * not related to the games team
> * no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to work on it
together with community.
> * low quality
low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality ebuilds in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
> well, then you get what you deserve.
Yes, I am so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
That means two things:
* DOCS variable/array is now handled by "einstalldocs"
* einstalldocs is _only_ carried out automatically if
multilib_src_install_all is not overwritten (
On 10/20/2013 07:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 11:40 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
>>> The affected packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are
>>> totally broken but it's more like of another way to tell you that
>>> a few QA problems exist and that it would be nice to fix t
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>> * not related to the games team
>> * no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>
> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to work on it
> together with community.
>
>> * low quality
> low qual
On 21 October 2013 01:09, hasufell wrote:
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>
> These are some arguments for such a repo:
> * sunrise does not allow ebuilds when any version is already in the
> tree (so no live or beta ebuilds for existing in-tree-games), so that
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>
>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough t
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>>
>>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to
On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
> - gpg control packet
> After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
"probably"? Then this does not belong to the announcement list if no
final decisions have been made yet
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> - gpg control packet After doing some tests we will probably
>> apply this patch from bug 483304.
>
> "probably"? Then this does not belong to the announcement
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, hasufell wrote:
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
> ...
> Yes, overlays suck. But bugzilla as a review platform sucks more and
> IRC is also not the first place people look for.
I think having an overlay which is reviewed for qualit
On 10/01/2013 04:52 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Due to voip lack of active maintainers:
>
> Not co-maintained with anyone else:
>
> dev-libs/jrtplib
> media-libs/libj2k
> media-libs/libmimic
> net-libs/iax
> net-libs/sofia-sip
> net-misc/asterisk-rate_engine
> net-misc/asterisk-span
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
> * not related to the games team * no review whatso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:00 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, hasufell
> wrote:
>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>> ... Yes, overlays suck. But bugzilla as a review platform sucks
>> more and IRC is
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/20
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>
> Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really
> interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that?
A guy asked you why you don't work in the gamerlay. All you said was
that gamerlay was a failed attemp and that you have z
On 10/20/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On
> Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really
> interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that?
I bet, you misunderstand that position. It is a big difference between «users
is not interested in review» and «users is not interested to follow the way
like «som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSZAD3AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWztwMIAKT0q2
Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 18:12:39 schrieb hasufell:
> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
Well maybe others do now?
http://cdn.meme.li/i/p77qn.jpg
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 06:52 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 18:12:39 schrieb hasufell:
>> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in
>> discussing here.
>
> Well maybe others do now?
>
> http://cdn.meme.li/i/p77qn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:12:39 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> This thread is derailed ...
The argument << deprecate repositories like "gamerlay" which do not
undergo any kind of review and have low quality >> you gave causes a sub
thread that tests the reali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 17:22:24 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> I personally would propose the standard github way.
>
> The only thing that still bothers me about that is that there is no
> automatic way of doing a "repoman full" check, like the travis hooks
>
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-10-20 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-db/edb 2013-10-19 06:08:25 mr_bones_
x11-plugins/yawmppp 2013-10-19 06:09:06 mr_bones_
x11-plugins/mountapp
I see this thread didn't get many answers; anyway, I agree with all
what you wrote and thank you for taking the time to write this down, so
a big +1 from me
Alexis.
39 matches
Mail list logo
