Hello, all.
I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
way of proceeding with it.
We've just lately finished the git->git-2 eclass migration. The old
eclass is no longer used and is marked for removal
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 08:10 +0400, Heather escribió:
[...]
>
> Hello.
>
>
> I used to mail you two times about it...
> I have no developer status but I need to know if you mind to take me
> on the board.
>
> My recruitment bug is #461458.
>
Maybe I missed them for some reason :O, let me ch
Michał Górny writes:
> I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
> waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
> way of proceeding with it.
TL;DR any futher, but I have few packages which use git-2 eclass and I
wouldn't like to have any break
> 2. Kill EGIT_HAS_SUBMODULES and autodetect submodules,
I'm disagreed. Sometimes submodules, that repo suggests is unneded,
since they fetches external package, that specified as RDEP.
>
> 3. Kill EGIT_OPTIONS since it limits the possibility of changing eclass
>code,
:-/
> 4. Kill EGIT_MA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 07:30 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>> 4. Kill EGIT_MASTER (it's more trouble than benefit),
>
> Only if EGIT_BRANCH will stay on it's place.
>
..and work as well as EGIT_MASTER. I've had issues at times trying to
get the branc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 08:46 AM, hasufell wrote:
> I want the council to make clear whether useflags that are:
>
> * unsupported by the maintainer * are known to break the build or
> application at runtime * introduce security vulnerabilities
>
> are allowed
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 18:30:06
"Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" napisał(a):
> > 2. Kill EGIT_HAS_SUBMODULES and autodetect submodules,
>
> I'm disagreed. Sometimes submodules, that repo suggests is unneded,
> since they fetches external package, that specified as RDEP.
Then you are using EGIT_HAS
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 09:01:54
Ian Stakenvicius napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 28/08/13 07:30 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> >> 4. Kill EGIT_MASTER (it's more trouble than benefit),
> >
> > Only if EGIT_BRANCH will stay on it's place.
> >
>
>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:34:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
> taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever it
> requires. I don't have much time to invest on their packages and,
> then, there are some p
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:00:07 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> What are your thoughts?
If possible, assuming it is not already possible I would like to see
support for checking out multiple repositories; that way the patches
can simply be obtained from a repository instead of having to
explicitly snap
Since the project lead doesn't respond to private mails, is not present
in the projects IRC channel and does not comment on my bug reports I
want to ask here for review of the following packages, because those are
non-trivial libraries:
SDL2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826
sdl-imag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/27/2013 02:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
> taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever
> it requires. I don't have much time to invest on their pack
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:37:44 +0200
hasufell wrote:
From a fairly quick review:
> smpeg2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481792
https://481792.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=356542
What if what the debug flag does is changed in the future?
I'd suggest to drop the flag and patch the
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 16:31:36
Tom Wijsman napisał(a):
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:00:07 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > What are your thoughts?
>
> If possible, assuming it is not already possible I would like to see
> support for checking out multiple repositories; that way the patches
> c
Just small, very small comments. To avoid being accused of bikeshedding,
I'm totally fine if you don't apply any of them. It's entirely up to you. :)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826 :
> if use directfb ; then
> # since DirectFB can link against SDL and trigger a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>
>> S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_mixer-${PV}
>
> Why no quotes? ("")
>
>
>> S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
>
> Why no quotes? ("")
>
>
>> S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_ttf-${PV}
>
> I suggest quotes ("").
>
Those are vari
> What did you use that for?
Actually, for "--depth 1" in custom non-maintained-already ebuild ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
My previous mail didn't focus on the most important thing, so I'd like
to start another thread with a simple question: do we need to provide
a user-friendly ${DISTDIR}/egit-src/?
Currently the repository stores consists of either bare or non-bare
clones of the remote repository. We do not
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 16:13 +0200, Tom Wijsman escribió:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:34:00 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
> > taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever it
> > requires. I do
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 16:46 +0200, hasufell escribió:
> On 08/27/2013 02:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
> > taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever
> > it requires. I don't have much time t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/28/2013 10:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The new eclass is supposedly used by 732 in-tree packages [1], and
> possibly a few dozens out-of-the-tree. Some parts of the eclass
> API are barely used. I would really prefer to avoid yet another
> ecl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 01:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The question would be: do you feel like we should really provide a
> verbatim clone of upstream's repository? Or should we focus on the
> eclass' main goal, that is fetching the remote sources in the most
Somewhat unrelated, but please think about it when you make
such a major change:
Michał Górny wrote:
> EVCS_OFFLINE 0 // these are for make.conf
> EGIT_REPACK 0
> EGIT_PRUNE0
The latter two were always bugging me since they should better
be coupled with EVCS_OFFLINE:
IMHO, *whenever* the
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:14:35 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> If you are talking about Heather, looks like for some reason I was
> missing some of his mails (I was losing them), I am reviewing that
> problem.
Just his mails or more than that? I see you are not on IRC as often as
in the past; so, it wo
On 28 August 2013 16:00, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
> waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
> way of proceeding with it.
>
> We've just lately finished the git->git-2 eclass migration.
28.08.2013 20:06, hasufell пишет:
> On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>>
>>> S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_mixer-${PV}
>
>> Why no quotes? ("")
>
>
>>> S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
>
>> Why no quotes? ("")
>
>
>>> S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_ttf-${PV}
>
>> I suggest quotes ("").
>
>
>
> Those are var
Dnia 2013-08-29, o godz. 10:41:08
Sergey Popov napisał(a):
> 28.08.2013 20:06, hasufell пишет:
> > On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >>>
> >>> S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_mixer-${PV}
> >
> >> Why no quotes? ("")
> >
> >
> >>> S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
> >
> >> Why no quotes? ("")
> >
> >
27 matches
Mail list logo
