On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:16:44PM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > - changing ownership and permissions of all the files.
>
> As a side note: why is /usr/games owned by uid "games"? Does
> games_pkg_setup() in games.eclass do that? What's t
On 05/21/2012 10:17 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:16:44PM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
- changing ownership and permissions of all the files.
As a side note: why is /usr/games owned by uid "games"? Does
games_pkg_setup
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 02:41 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the package
> > uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is how
> > autoreconf
>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I don't know the current situation, but I recall that in the past,
> some games pounded away directly on the VGA hardware for speed, or
> called libraries that did so.
I think that the main sentiment in this thread is that, while
/usr/games h
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:30 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 02:01 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
>> On 05/20/2012 07:49 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2012 01:36 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell
wrote:
> I want support for installing icon
On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the
> > package uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is
> > how autoreconf itself does it
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:36 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the
> > > package uses gettext. the configure chec
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories
> which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just pixmaps.
>
> proposal attached + diff
>
> This should not break existing ebuilds. Tested a bit and open for
> review now.
On Monday 21 May 2012 12:08:21 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:36 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call
On 05/21/2012 08:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200
hasufell wrote:
I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories
which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just pixmaps.
proposal attached + diff
This should not break existing ebuilds. Test
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are
On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the
> > package uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is
> > how autoreconf itself does it
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2012 12:08:21 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > Realistically, every Gentoo machine, with the exception of pure deployment
> > installations that don't build any packages (and therefore don't care about
> > autotools.eclass a
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
> Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs wa
On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
>> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>>
>> Rely
On Monday 21 May 2012 15:04:44 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.
> > eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.
On 05/21/2012 07:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> I want support for installing icons into the appropriate
>> directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just
>> pixmaps.
>>
>> proposal attached + diff
>>
>> This should not brea
On 05/21/2012 06:46 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils,
> see
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
>
>
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
> of nowhere. I don't believe this
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:26:14AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
> I suppose you mean the "XFree86-DGA extension", USE="dga"?
>
> $ cd $(portageq envvar PORTDIR)
> $ grep -r IUSE.*dga */*/*.ebuild
>
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/x11-libs/libXxf86dga
>
> But I fail to see
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
>> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
>> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
>>
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> >> remove e
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
>> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inhe
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depr
2012/5/21 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> >> Excuse me but the way thi
2012-05-22 01:01:04 Francesco Riosa napisał(a):
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> >> remove eutils
On Monday 21 May 2012 15:58:24 hasufell wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 07:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> >> I want support for installing icons into the appropriate
> >> directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just
> >> pixmaps.
> >>
>
On Sunday 20 May 2012 19:24:13 hasufell wrote:
> case ${2} in
please use $1/$2/etc... with positional variables when possible
> 16|22|24|32|36|48|64|72|96|128|192|256)
> size=${2}x${2};;
>
> 16x16|22x
On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote:
> To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will
the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng? -really-ng? =)
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Council Member /
I've added 4.7.0 to the tree tonight (unkeyworded and masked as usual).
I've also keyworded the 4.6 series on all arches except amd64 (due to the
grub bug). This is a temporary measure until we figure out the best course of
action (at least we have some people looking at the problem now).
I pers
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:16:25 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 06:46 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils,
> > see
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:50 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
>
> I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will
> the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng?
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:50:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
>
> I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will
> the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng
On 22/05/12 07:58, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:50 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
>>
>> I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will
>> the n
34 matches
Mail list logo
