Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:17:09 + as excerpted:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still
>> fail to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS="*" to
>> be used :-|
>
> 'c
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Hello
>
> Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491
>
> Thanks
>
This is an updated news item for trying to cover Ciaran and Matthew
suggestions:
1. It doesn't
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > Hello
> >
> > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
> This is an up
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for
> > > htt
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 20:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still
> > fail to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS="*"
> > to be used :-|
>
> 'cameras
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > Pl
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:37 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> > > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > > > El dom, 13-02-2
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Title: Change on CAMERAS handling in libgphoto2-2.4.10
Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters for the title.
> In order to not violate package manager handling
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/346491),
> selective cameras build logic has bee
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:40 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:37 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > > El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> > > > Le lundi 14 févri
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:41 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Title: Change on CAMERAS handling in libgphoto2-2.4.10
>
> Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters for the title.
>
> > In order to not violate package manager handlin
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:42 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:40 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:37 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
> > > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > > > El lun, 14-02-2011 a las
Sometimes there are very simple things we can do to make arch
developers' life easier. For example, when stabilizing multiple packages
it's very helpful to post a snippet that can be copy-pasted to
package.keywords, like in those bugs:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322791
http://bugs.gent
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:07:44 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> For sake of argument, what about the individuals, plus one called
> allknown, or majorcams, or some such?
Breaks USE deps, and makes conditionals much harder to write. Maybe not
an issue here, but sucky in general.
--
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:42:35 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Bleh, forget it, it is a headache to disable cameras then :-S
You should be able to -* them out... -* is fine (assuming Portage
handles it) since we know what the null set is; it's just * that's the
problem.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:42 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Do you know if there are any plans on implementing it on a future
> EAPI? I think being able to simply enable all of them with "*" would
> be interesting (at least in the future)
It *was* in EAPI 4, since it's necessary to make [use(+)] deps
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 13:19 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:42:35 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Bleh, forget it, it is a headache to disable cameras then :-S
>
> You should be able to -* them out... -* is fine (assuming Portage
> handles it) since we know what the nu
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:33:52 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > You should be able to -* them out... -* is fine (assuming Portage
> > handles it) since we know what the null set is; it's just * that's
> > the problem.
>
> Yeah, portage handles it, but thought -* also had the same problem,
> thanks for
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 13:30 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." a écrit :
> Sometimes there are very simple things we can do to make arch
> developers' life easier. For example, when stabilizing multiple packages
> it's very helpful to post a snippet that can be copy-pasted to
> package.keywords, like
Il giorno lun, 14/02/2011 alle 14.49 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue ha
scritto:
> Arches can then do cat gnome.list |egrep "myarch" | cut -f1 -d' ' and
> they only get the set they should work on.
awk '/myarch/ { print $1 }' gnome.list
Just sayin' ;)
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.2.2011 14:49, Gilles Dartiguelongue napsal(a):
> Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 13:30 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." a écrit :
>> Sometimes there are very simple things we can do to make arch
>> developers' life easier. For example, when stabilizing mul
On 02/14/11 07:13, Jacob Godserv wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:36, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Remember that for *all* QA masking, the rule is simple
>
> Could you point me to the Q/A policies and rules? I'm curious now,
> seeing this intense discussion about what's right for Q/A, what the
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:37:29 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> > patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> > you add hassle to end users who d/l random packages and try to build
> > things
> > themselves, and y
2011/2/14 Tomáš Chvátal :
> Dne 14.2.2011 14:49, Gilles Dartiguelongue napsal(a):
> Same does x11 team...
> Example:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354237
>
> I think this does not need any policy, most teams can use brains and
> fill the bugs quite conveniently :)
>
In related news, the
On 2/14/11 3:07 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Same does x11 team...
> Example:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354237
>
> I think this does not need any policy, most teams can use brains and
> fill the bugs quite conveniently :)
Well, that's the entire point. For the bug you cited, and - fo
Hello
Please see attached news item for reviewing. Referred guide is still not
committed as
it still needs some work about evolution stuff that Gilles will provide soon.
Thanks
Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.32
Author: Pacho Ramos
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2011-02-14
Revision: 1
News-Item-F
On 02/14/2011 07:52 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 2/14/11 3:07 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Same does x11 team...
>> Example:
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354237
>>
>> I think this does not need any policy, most teams can use brains and
>> fill the bugs quite conveniently :)
>
>
On 2/14/11 9:13 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> And http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349053#c1 ? I tried to
> provide a clue howto get usable p.keywords list easy.
IMHO it's in the middle. I still have to do a manual step, but at least
it's pretty straightforward. Anyway, I think a list that
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 13:41 +, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:33:52 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > You should be able to -* them out... -* is fine (assuming Portage
> > > handles it) since we know what the null set is; it's just * that's
> > > the problem.
> >
> > Yea
On Monday, February 14, 2011 10:37:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:37:29 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Il giorno sab, 12/02/2011 alle 18.21 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
> > > patching packages in the tree is a huge hassle,
> > > you add hassle to end users who d
# Pacho Ramos (14 Feb 2011)
# Old, unmaintained by upstream and nothing in the tree needs
# it. See bug #354243 for reference. Will be removed in 30 days.
app-office/abiword-plugins
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Please see attached news item for reviewing. Referred guide is still not
> committed as
> it still needs some work about evolution stuff that Gilles will provide soon.
Would it make sense to mention the timeline for stabilizing gnome? Is
it
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 17:40 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Please see attached news item for reviewing. Referred guide is still not
> > committed as
> > it still needs some work about evolution stuff that Gilles will provide
> > soon.
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> My plans were to CC arches around Thursday or so
>
Sorry - I was thinking in the news item itself, and of course getting
the news item out a day or two before CCing arches...
El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 17:52 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > My plans were to CC arches around Thursday or so
> >
>
> Sorry - I was thinking in the news item itself, and of course getting
> the news item out a day or two before CCing arche
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:37:27 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Have you thought about doing something like what was done for wxwidgets ?
>
> - an eselect module for out of portage builds
> - an eclass creating symlinks for libpng.pc/.so in $T and setting the correct
> -L flag for the linker and PKG
35 matches
Mail list logo
