El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:37 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : > > El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: > > > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : > > > > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for > > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an updated news item for trying to cover Ciaran and Matthew > > > > suggestions: > > > > 1. It doesn't ask people to use USE="*" > > > > 2. Before sending this, I would add all cameras to base/make.defaults as > > > > already done for similar cases (like alsa, lcd devices and others) > > > > > > > > Do you agree with this? > > > > > > > > Thanks :-) > > > > > > no, adding all cameras is most likely a waste of time for maintainers, > > > it is prone to errors when cameras get added/removed which is already > > > complicated enough to maintain. > > > > > > > What kind of errors will people see? As I have just tested, if I run: > > CAMERAS="bbhsgdd" emerge -pv media-libs/libgphoto2 > > > > I get no error (that would be equivalent to a camera that got removed on > > a bump). > > I was talking about human error while adding stuff to appropriate files. > It happens already often enough with just the IUSE_EXPAND feature. >
Then, as ebuild uses EAPI2, why don't enable all of them in ebuild
itself by default?
for camera in ${IUSE_CAMERAS}; do
- IUSE="${IUSE} cameras_${camera}"
+ IUSE="${IUSE} +cameras_${camera}"
done
Looks to work as expected here and wouldn't be prone to human errors
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
