El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : > > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > Hello > > > > > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491 > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > This is an updated news item for trying to cover Ciaran and Matthew > > suggestions: > > 1. It doesn't ask people to use USE="*" > > 2. Before sending this, I would add all cameras to base/make.defaults as > > already done for similar cases (like alsa, lcd devices and others) > > > > Do you agree with this? > > > > Thanks :-) > > no, adding all cameras is most likely a waste of time for maintainers, > it is prone to errors when cameras get added/removed which is already > complicated enough to maintain. >
What kind of errors will people see? As I have just tested, if I run: CAMERAS="bbhsgdd" emerge -pv media-libs/libgphoto2 I get no error (that would be equivalent to a camera that got removed on a bump). In the case of a CAMERA addition, we would see it when bumping (as one of them wouldn't be enabled automatically). It doesn't look to complicate to maintain for me then :-/ > If someone really wants a non-null default, I suggest enabling the ptp2 > camera driver (PTP support) which is available for most cameras out > there. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
