Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Steve Long wrote:
>> > > Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
>> > > go with that. It's a /classic/ usage of that variable, as it's simply
>> > > a boolean; PROPERTIES is well-defined
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times if
> you try this at home):
A big gain in the context of ebuilds and source packages. Well done.
- ferdy
pgprSLpWrpb0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
server16
logrotate 10
gsm 9
custom-cflags 9
kontact 8
openmp8
plasma7
html 7
demo 7
smp
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:36:32 +0200
Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> server16
Already been discussed, can't be done.
> logrotate 10
Already been discussed. Will no doubt descend into the same long
argument that happens every time this comes up.
El mar, 14-10-2008 a las 18:24 -0700, Alec Warner escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > There's no need to commit straight to stable. Just make two different
> > new revisions for each EAPI. Then the arch teams can test it like usual.
>
>
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 10:33:22 Steve Long wrote:
> Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times if
> you try this at home):
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo "$( #!/bin/bash
> P='some-crap/god-i-hate-asshats'
I do hope that that isn't directed at anyone in particular.
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2008 04:43:48 Steve Long wrote:
>> EBZR_OPTIONS="${EBZR_OPTIONS:-}" (and similar variants)
>> doesn't do anything (beyond waste lex and yacc time.)
>
> It gets listed in the generated man page.
>
>From what I remember of the awk that generates thos
Alec Warner wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> There's no need to commit straight to stable. Just make two different
>> new revisions for each EAPI. Then the arch teams can test it like usual.
>
> Aha a perfect canidate use case for GLEP 55[1] that fends off 'why are
> there multiple versions of the
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
>>> insinto /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples
>> Is there any chance we can start using correctly quoted filenames across
>> the board?
>
> Since when is ${P} allowed to have spaces?
>
I believe I answered this in my prior post.
>> Besides being faster (quote th
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa ?:
>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some
>> > packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should
>> > we leave the system packages out completly?
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
>> Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times
>> if you try this at home):
>
> A big gain in the context of ebuilds and source packages. Well done.
>
Yes, almost as important as
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:28:43 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> >> Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker
> >> times if you try this at home):
> >
> > A big gain in th
David Leverton wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 10:33:22 Steve Long wrote:
>> Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times
>> if you try this at home):
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo "$(> #!/bin/bash
>> P='some-crap/god-i-hate-asshats'
>
> I do hope that that isn't
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:36:32 +0200
> Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> server16
>
> Already been discussed, can't be done.
>
What does it break?
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:51:32 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each
> > iteration?
> >
> Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the first iteration in general, btw.)
18% of nothing is nothing.
> perhaps you're just feeling defensive ab
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:53:14 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:36:32 +0200
> > Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> server16
> >
> > Already been discussed, can't be done.
> >
> What does it break?
Have
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:51:32PM +0100, Ranjit Singh wrote:
> > This is a purely stylistic issue, same as the braces with variable
> > expansions.
> See my other posts.
Your other posts only show that this is, indeed, a personal stylistic
issue. And a pointless one, too.
- ferdy
pgpY8zl8tdvK
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Utterly illegal, needs to die.
Why? I don't agree that it needs to be the global useflags, but I don't
consider it illegal either.
It's defined by toolchain.eclass and toolchain-binutils.eclass, and
deliberately in a very careful m
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:47:06 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Utterly illegal, needs to die.
>
> Why? I don't agree that it needs to be the global useflags, but I
> don't consider it illegal either.
It's ille
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:19:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:47:06 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Utterly illegal, needs to die.
> >
> > Why? I don't agree th
I'm deliberately starting a new thread here, because this is meandering
well off the original topic of the global useflag proposals.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:18:16AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> There are also other issues, e.g. it breaks the generation of the
> @installed package set as the ins
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:20:32 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ignoring Vapier's tirade against ciaranm there, we need the
> xDEPEND-syntax for SLOTS as the real solution, however that still
> wouldn't resolve the portion that has CTARGET as part of the SLOT,
> since metadata g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
[...]
>>> for ((i=0;i<10;i++)); do echo /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples >
>>> /dev/null;
>>> real 11.25
>>> real 9.24
>> So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each iteration?
>>
> Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the
В Срд, 15/10/2008 в 20:51 +0100, Steve Long пишет:
> >> for ((i=0;i<10;i++)); do echo /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples >
> >> /dev/null;
> >
> >> real 11.25
> >
> >> real 9.24
> >
> > So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each iteration?
> >
> Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the
24 matches
Mail list logo
