Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] custom-cflags global USE

2007-02-23 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:40 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the > tree > as well. Except some things really do not compile with it enabled. Now, if you're meaning you'd prefer patch every compilation failure using -ffast-math

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] custom-cflags global USE

2007-02-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 23 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:40 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the > > tree as well. > > Except some things really do not compile with it enabled. Now, if > you're meaning you'

[gentoo-dev] CVS/SVN migration completed

2007-02-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:05:23AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Status updates will be posted to the topic of #gentoo-dev as per previous > migrations. Ok, ow, that was painful. But it's all done now after 5.5 hours of work, with a few cleanups pending. If you have commit notifications that w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] custom-cflags global USE

2007-02-23 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Freitag, 23. Februar 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Except some things really do not compile with it enabled. Now, if > you're meaning you'd prefer patch every compilation failure using > -ffast-math instead, then I'd say go for it. Patches are always a > better solution than workarounds. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Friday 23 February 2007 06:18, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:05:56 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:08:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh > | > | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > As has been discussed in the past, the only corre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:56:19 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Disallowing it would be the cleaner in terms of package manager | responsibilities, but ... Well, I looked through the tree. There is exactly one package using this construct that doesn't get it wrong. That package is o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 24 February 2007 03:57, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:56:19 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | Disallowing it would be the cleaner in terms of package manager > | responsibilities, but ... > > Well, I looked through the tree. > > There is exactly one

[gentoo-dev] Install locations for doc packages

2007-02-23 Thread Ryan Hill
Hey guys. There are a bunch of ebuilds (mostly in app-doc) that install stuff like HOWTOs, guides, reference manuals, books published under Creative Commons, etc. Currently the majority of these are installed into /usr/share/doc/${PF}. The problem with this is every time one of these packages ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:27:35 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | For the 14 cases you mentioned that were making a mistake, they | probably can be rewritten so as to force an install of the first | matching package, but when that isn't what is wanted it becomes a bit | of a headache. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 24 February 2007 12:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:27:35 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | For the 14 cases you mentioned that were making a mistake, they > | probably can be rewritten so as to force an install of the first > | matching package,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:09:40 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Saturday 24 February 2007 12:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:27:35 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | For the 14 cases you mentioned that were making a mistake, they | > | prob

[gentoo-dev] multilib-strict

2007-02-23 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, I'm not familiar with this test, and I jhave a bug against one of the packages I maintain that says it fails for e package. Where do I find information on how to fix the package? Thanks, - -- William Hubbs gentoo accessibility team lead [EMAI

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 24 February 2007 13:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:09:40 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Okay, I must be missing something here. If package foo can work with > | either bar or baz equily as well but not both, why should it force an > | artificial preferen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Install locations for doc packages

2007-02-23 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: > Hey guys. > > There are a bunch of ebuilds (mostly in app-doc) that install stuff like > HOWTOs, guides, reference manuals, books published under Creative > Commons, etc. Currently the majority of these are installed into > /usr/sh