On Friday 23 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:40 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the
> > tree as well.
>
> Except some things really do not compile with it enabled.  Now, if
> you're meaning you'd prefer patch every compilation failure using
> -ffast-math instead, then I'd say go for it.  Patches are always a
> better solution than workarounds.

filtering encourages users to continue to put -ffast-math into their global 
CFLAGS ... this is just plain wrong

ignoring compile issues, fast math can break runtime code that actually 
requires the IEEE compliant behavior ... the only people who know 
whether -ffast-math is safe are the upstream maintainers ... leave using the 
flag to them
-mike

Attachment: pgpyHXYIo5jKS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to