Okay, so if I have a servlet to deploy to an application container such as
tomcat, is there an eclass that I can use to inherit from?
Obviously the webapp eclass helps for straight apache-like deployments, but
it's not going to help much when deploying to tomcat.
I looked in /usr/portage/ebuild
Dave Nebinger wrote:
> Okay, so if I have a servlet to deploy to an application container such as
> tomcat, is there an eclass that I can use to inherit from?
I don't think so.
>
> Obviously the webapp eclass helps for straight apache-like deployments, but
> it's not going to help much when dep
On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
> included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
> in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or
> so however, so i guess it's now
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:07:23AM -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
> So how do I get my war file deployed? Am I left to external tools such as ant
> to manage that for me?
>
> How does such an entity fit within the portage world?
Each J2EE server has its own method for deploying j2ee archives. I don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
>>included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
>>in portage. The grub maintai
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
> >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P
> >
> > It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everyth
Here is the package.mask entry explaining the situation:
# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02 Oct 2005)
# Upstream is dead and does not compile against the latest swig.
# There are no packages using the library and there are better
# alternatives. Will be moved to java experimental if no-one ste
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
> > >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P
>
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
take place in ebuild ... conf
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
| supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
| take place
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > > > On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>I still think it's retarded to have a re
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| | into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
| | suppose
This is what I have found thanks to research of friendly people!
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29810 (pkg_config
only interactive)
and, somewhere in dev manual it does say test can be interactive
also.. not sure about that though
On 10/2/05, Fernando J. Pereda <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
> are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
> tests if I'm not mistaken
Even if they succeed? The point of test is to get some additi
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:50:53 +0200 "Fernando J. Pereda"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| | | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796)
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
| > Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| > are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
| > tests if I'
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| | are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
| | tests if I'm not mistaken
|
| Yup. There're quite a few broken test packages in the
2.10.2005, 20:13:52, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> | On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
| >> Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| >> are broken. They ask you to
The ready to cut ebuild at the bottom print it's environment (variable
and functions) to a bunch of files into /var/tmp/fakebuild/.
May be useful for who want to have a look at "what" and "when" is
avaible during the various emerge phases (but not limited to).
usage:
# env -i \
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/th
Chris Bainbridge posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:43:04 +:
> On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 02/10/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Chris Bainbridge wrote
Well, I've been plugging along happily on constructing an ebuild for zimbra.
But because of a) their built-in hardwiring and b) ant-based build/install
system, my ebuild is starting to get pretty big and complex.
In order to keep my own thought patterns straight, I've isolated a lot of the
code
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:58:19 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| a) are there limits to the size and/or complexity of the ebuilds that
| are accepted into portage?
Well...
* Whoever ends up maintaining said ebuild must understand it.
* Too much complexity is often a sign that you're
On Sunday 02 October 2005 08:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:58:19 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | a) are there limits to the size and/or complexity of the ebuilds that
> | are accepted into portage?
>
> Well...
>
> * Too much complexity is often a sign
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:48:27 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So yeah, things are pretty complicated due to the upstream build
| system expectations.
I suggest hitting upstream with a cluebat until they make a proper
build system.
| 1. Can I use /usr/local/portage/eclass for devel
On Sunday 02 October 2005 09:28 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:48:27 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | So yeah, things are pretty complicated due to the upstream build
> | system expectations.
>
> I suggest hitting upstream with a cluebat until they make a
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:10 pm, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
|
|>I was wondering if there's any chance of having the reiser4 patch for
|>grub (or even the whole grub-reiser4 distfile) added to the ebuild.
|>There are various
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:50:07 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Their build system suits their purpose - distribute a LAMP-like
| system for the foundation of their web application. I'm sure it will
| keep them from getting distracted from questions like 'zimbra works
| for postfix 2
On Monday 03 October 2005 12:47 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:50:07 -0400 Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Their build system suits their purpose - distribute a LAMP-like
> | system for the foundation of their web application. I'm sure it will
> | keep them fr
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Francesco R wrote:
> The ready to cut ebuild at the bottom print it's environment (variable
> and functions) to a bunch of files into /var/tmp/fakebuild/.
> May be useful for who want to have a look at "what" and "when" is
> avaible during the various emerg
Ladies & Gentlemen,
Some of you may know me from lurking on #gentoo-dev or moderating
#gentoo or any of another handful of channels that I'm in. Anyway, I'm
trying to become a developer and to learn the Gentoo way. I have been
assigned an old bug to try and resolve, Bug #5113, "New addus
31 matches
Mail list logo
