On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be > included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel > in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or > so however, so i guess it's now up to the base-system herd. I was under > the impression that feature-adding patches should be sent upstream. > > I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but > whatever stirs your pot. ;P
It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else. Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list