On 02/10/05, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
> included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
> in portage.  The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or
> so however, so i guess it's now up to the base-system herd.  I was under
> the impression that feature-adding patches should be sent upstream.
>
> I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
> whatever stirs your pot. ;P

It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else.
Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot?

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to