Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-19 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:19:10 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since GLEP 42's original author and sponsor has left the project, I've > taken it over, and would like to have another go at getting it > implemented. OK, since noone has raised any significant issues with this, I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-12 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:26:18 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Bennett wrote: > > * Portage must provide a way for external programs to obtain a list > > of all repository identifiers for a given system. It is assumed > > that this will be in the form of a ``portageq`` command

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-12 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:26:18 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Portage must provide a way for external programs to obtain a list > > of all repository identifiers for a given system. It is assumed > > that this will be in the form of a ``portageq`` command (e.g. > > ``portageq get

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:26:18 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I have no problem with basically writing up 'fake' portageq calls. | However often people tell me overlays are important, they don't serve | as multipile repos and don't have metadata/news, so they are excluded | in this s

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-12 Thread Alec Warner
Stephen Bennett wrote: Since GLEP 42's original author and sponsor has left the project, I've taken it over, and would like to have another go at getting it implemented. I've just updated the version in CVS[1], which should be making its way onto the www nodes, but with any luck the full text sho

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (News) revisited

2006-06-12 Thread Stephen Bennett
Since GLEP 42's original author and sponsor has left the project, I've taken it over, and would like to have another go at getting it implemented. I've just updated the version in CVS[1], which should be making its way onto the www nodes, but with any luck the full text should be attached here for