Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > XEmacs: > I cannot tell much, but graaff seems to have closed most of the severe > bugs and worked on having more/bette eclasses for the app-xemacs > category. Most bugs are closed and the ones remaining have mostly been discussed w

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Ryan Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 17:51 Thu 10 Jan , Ryan Hill wrote: If you do, I can start doing package mask reports again. I stopped when the GWN did since I didn't think it was very interesting to -dev readers that see the individual announcements anyways. Keep 'em coming to -dev-announce,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 17:51 Thu 10 Jan , Ryan Hill wrote: > If you do, I can start doing package mask reports again. I stopped when > the GWN did since I didn't think it was very interesting to -dev readers > that see the individual announcements anyways. Keep 'em coming to -dev-announce, at least. Without a

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Ryan Hill
Anant Narayanan wrote: Good day All, Sorry for the thread hijack, but... GWN: The GWN is currently in a permanent state of hiatus. I have no intentions on spending another minute working on the GWN. While many, many improvements have been made in the processes for getting the automated data,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Petteri Räty
William L. Thomson Jr. kirjoitti: gcj is not even official maintained by any Gentoo Devs atm. No where near close to being added to tree. Much less in the same overlay as openjdk. Not that it's in bad shape, but there is no syncing or collaboration there. But seems moot, as IcedTea should not req

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 22:21 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. kirjoitti: > > > > No clue on ETA. I will take a peek/poke at it. I need to double check, > > but pretty sure icedtea might still need sun-jdk to build. Even if that > > is not the case, things like the plugin and oth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Petteri Räty
William L. Thomson Jr. kirjoitti: No clue on ETA. I will take a peek/poke at it. I need to double check, but pretty sure icedtea might still need sun-jdk to build. Even if that is not the case, things like the plugin and other non-open aspects aren't available yet in icedtea. So there is still m

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Duncan
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:27:08 -0500: > I need to double check, > but pretty sure icedtea might still need sun-jdk to build. Even if that > is not the case, things like the plugin and other non-open aspects > ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:06 +, Duncan wrote: > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:41:55 +0200: > > > Luca Barbato kirjoitti: > >> Petteri Räty wrote: > >>> [Java] > >> > >> any plan/idea about icedtea? as a ppc user I'd love

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-10 Thread Duncan
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:41:55 +0200: > Luca Barbato kirjoitti: >> Petteri Räty wrote: >>> [Java] >> >> any plan/idea about icedtea? as a ppc user I'd love[] >> > Well having it open source doesn't mean automatically ppc

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-09 Thread Gunnar Wrobel
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we > going to do?" > > Please project leaders try to reply in short. > > About the stuff I'm involved: web-apps > > Are we fine? webapps is more or less fine. We have several people in t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-09 Thread Ryan Hill
Luca Barbato wrote: Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we going to do?" Please project leaders try to reply in short. [ wxWidgets ] (i'm not the lead but i don't think leio will mind) Done: We got 2.8 into the tree (yay). After a few bug reports that were mo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-09 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, CCing gentoo-lisp mailing list. Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please project leaders try to reply in short. Though Emacs project (subproject of Lisp) has no official leader, I speak up as senior dev. :) > Are we fine? XEmacs: I cannot tell much, but graaff seems to have closed mos

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-07 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - video: Hopefully nothing much beside trying to give the best and > freshest snapshots from the repository you started to know (mplayer, > ffmpeg, xine, vlc...Hi Diego =)) I'm involved just in one and a half of those ;) As for me, I mostly handle PAM (

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-07 Thread Markus Ullmann
Luca Barbato schrieb: Are we fine? lcd : G15 in good shape, no major issues anywhere ldap: openldap works good, nss_ldap has some issues here and there net-irc : some minor issues with dead-upstream apps or apps breaking their own configs but nothing too serious net-mon : beh