Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
>
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Its a good idea, but since our users don't always provide useful
> >> reports, it seems like we are
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:07:03 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. If we have a valid category name, but no valid package atoms (this
> may be a new or misspelt package), try to figure out which team might
> want it. Use the category-level metadata.xml file.
I wonder how often
Le mercredi 02 juillet 2008 à 00:30 +, Duncan a écrit :
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
>
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That said, I have no idea how many duplicate / incomplete bugs I have
> >
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Its a good idea, but since our users don't always provide useful
>> reports, it seems like we are just shifting work around.
>
> I'd suggest t
