Le mercredi 02 juillet 2008 à 00:30 +0000, Duncan a écrit :
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on  Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
> 
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That said, I have no idea how many duplicate / incomplete bugs I have
> > never seen due to the wonderful work of the wranglers.  In some ways it
> > would be a shame to lose that quality pre-reading of the bugs.
> 
> Perhaps the best solution is to get the implementation in place, but not 
> completely automate it.  Put the tools there so if it looks right, all 
> the wrangler needs to do is a single click, and it's auto-assigned, but 
> that single click is still necessary so that a human actually gets to 
> review things before doing the assignment.
> 
> That would make it /much/ easier for the wranglers.
> 
> If desired, a cron script or some such could then be setup to go thru and 
> automatically assign anything that wasn't assigned yet and that hadn't 
> been touched (no comments asking for more info, etc) for some period, say 
> a week, just to catch anything that fell thru the cracks or if the 
> wranglers all disappeared or went on strike/vacation/whatever.  Then if 
> folks ever suddenly find themselves inundated with "raw" bugs, it'd be a 
> serious indication that the wranglers needed some help.

sounds like a plan
-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Reply via email to