> If, as a user or an arch person, I get a src_test failure right now, I
> don't know whether this means "eek! Something's gone wrong, and I
> really need to fix this" or "oh, whoever maintains this package
> doesn't care". But with EAPI 2, I'll be able to know that a src_test
> failure really doe
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 14:18 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > As Fabian said it really isn't a matter of "We like XML better than LaTeX!"
> > It's not those people's prerogative.
>
> Problems like having homogeneous documentation aren't that small.
>
> > The people who wrot
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:34 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> This is not a support channel and that, while an interesting picture,
> provides absolutely no information whatsoever.
>
Indeed. Please try [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include some useful
background information.
Matthias
signature.asc
Desc
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying
> > > that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because
> > > no-one's maint
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:35 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:09:24 +0100
> Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you
> > a MIPS user? If so, do you think that running
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 09:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:08:47 +0100
> "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but
> > demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone.
> > And this a
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 02:06 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Сбт, 05/01/2008 в 18:19 +0100, Luca Barbato пишет:
> > Anything other suggestions?
>
> I think, arch which does not manage to cope with stabilize bugs force
> users to use unstable branch so it's good both for developers and users
> to fo
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:16 +, Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 14/12/07 14:12, Matthias Langer wrote:
>
> > F77="ifort" FC="ifort" FFLAGS="-O3 -xO" emerge -av openmpi
>
> This how it
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:13 +, Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 14/12/07 10:24, Matthias Langer wrote:
> >> On 02:10 Thu 13 Dec , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote:
> >>> 1.1 sys-clu
> On 02:10 Thu 13 Dec , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-cluster/openmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/openmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> > plain:
> > http://sources.gentoo.or
> http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
> (Needs lsb-release, portage-utils, lsof and python)
>
looks interesting indeed... whats also interesting: is there a reason
for lsb-release (a shell script) to be keyworded for x86 only?
matthias
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:24 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
> All-
>
> We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
> devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate
> in
> bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:45 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/07/08 12:31 +0200]:
> > Lars Weiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Comments are welcome!
> >
> > Have a look at app-portage/gatt-svn and help improve it. :)
>
> It's C++ :-(
>
well, helping
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:01 +0200, Alexander Gabert wrote:
> The person has personally attacked me after i simply concluded that he
> should maybe change his attitude to make a better impression on
> gentoo-dev and Gentoo developers. This guy is trolling for years and he
> enjoys and knows it a
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 16:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2007 17:44:46 +0200
> Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why did I knew that this argument would come? Maybe because it's your
> > default reaction to any opposition.
>
> What, providing evidence to the contrary? Wh
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:11 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to
> > breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in
> > the tree, and then
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:56 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthias Langer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Its obviously not, Many users are reporting fil
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
> Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
> weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
> not acting as you describe.
Can you provide some bug numbers to backup this claim?
Matthias
--
[EMAIL PRO
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 14:58 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Steve Long kirjoitti:
> >
> > That makes a lot of sense. How about exending it a tiny bit and asking for
> > it to be policy for all ebuilds EAPI=1 not to be allowed into stable
> > without RESTRICT=test, or a functional test suite on the ar
> > not having it tested.
> That all depends. If having it tested means that it _will_ work, I'd be
> infavour of that.
Well, the problem is, that a working test suite does not guarantee a
working program, as well as a failing test suite doesn't necessarily
mean that the program is broken. This
> > > The arch teams have been pushing for this for a long time. They're
> > > trying to get this enforced, but are having limited success because
> > > there's no way for FEATURES=test to become widely used that won't
> > > lead to broken user systems. Moving src_test to be always on in
> > > fut
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:47 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Well, I don't know what your problem really is about; I'm running x86,
> > and if something breaks on my system, it's mostly not because of
> &g
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:26 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:56:40 Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > ... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your
> > friggin packages alive and working?
> Indeed!!
>
> Doing an emerge --deep --update world last we
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:04 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Do you acknowledge that Portage is a severe limiting factor when it
> > comes to improving the Gentoo user experience as a whole?
>
> what a lame question ... rather than waste time on t
> I'm very strongly against using Gentoo SoC time and resources for things
> that are not officially part of Gentoo (yes, this statement could be
> spun however you wish) or are not official Gentoo projects. And no, just
> because a project has Gentoo developers in it doesn't mean that it's a
> Ge
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 18:18 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > So please, friends, just ignore it, nothing positive will come of it.
>
> Unfortunately it made its way onto big news site and lowers the view
> on Gentoo even more. From many comments I
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 06:27 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> [ Background: tr1 is a set of extensions to the C++ Standard Library
> giving various useful things like hash tables and smart pointers. There
> are partial implementations included in g++-4.1 and boost and full
> implementations available
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:42, Matthias Langer wrote:
> > however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
> > (see bug 154199)
>
> and someone should search for duplicates before filing bugs
ups ...
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering
> the
> problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
fine ... however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
(see bug 154199)
thanks,
matthias
--
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 07:56 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Matthias Langer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> excerpted below, on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:24:19 +0100:
>
> > I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in
> > ~arch ?
>
> General policy i
I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in
~arch ?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
After reading the response for bug 118607, which i filed, i was
woundering if there isn't a more appropriate default procedure for
packages with no homepages then just leaving the invalid 'homepage-link'
alone ... Shouldn't there be a way to tell portage that a certain
package simply doesn't have a
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 si
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 21:38 -0400, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
> Matthias Langer wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:04 -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Matthias Langer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>2.) emerge -e world on a system w
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:04 -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> Matthias Langer wrote:
> > 2.) emerge -e world on a system with lot of packages will most likley
> > fail somewhere during the process for various reasons. Fixig the problem
> > (for example by unmerging the package
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 21:31 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Saturday 03 of December 2005 21:26 Matthias Langer wrote:
> > 1.) If you remove gcc-3.3* before emerge -e system you will be left
> > behind with a broken python and therefore emerge. Thus i think there
> > should be
Well done, i've allready switched completely to gcc-3.4 with my main box
by reemerging about 650 packages. However, i allready started doing so a
few days ago, so I didn't read the official migration guide before
starting. Now, as everything works fine i just read this guide to
compair it with my o
I'm just a more or less simple user of gentoo who somtimes tries to look
a bit behind the curtain, so if you think this posting doesn't belong to
gentoo-dev let me know.
However, maybe this is interesting to you:
Recently i've got serious trouble with one of my hard drives, so that i
was forced t
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 03:03 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 01:30 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:02 -0500
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 01:30 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:02 -0500
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > 1.12.2005, 0:29:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.5 is all that's needed here t
40 matches
Mail list logo
