On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since
> > > they
> > > were unconditionally added to all packages
On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
> > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer
> > in
> > metadata) they are the de facto
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since
> >> they
> >> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-ge
On 22/05/17 05:12, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
>> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially
>>> since they
>>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev
>>> maintainer in
>
On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in
metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule e
On 05/20/2017 10:51 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job
as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have
to try to match him.
Was this comment really necessary
On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in
> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else.
Just to clarify, the
On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:46:25 -0700
Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, and for the curious:
>
> 1. How often do cache updates happen?
> 2. How long do they take?
> 3. Is there any downside to only having one such update running at a
> time and just skipping them if there's alread
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-21 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-emulation/crossover-office-bin 20170515-09:15 mgorny
d8471c0fb16
app-emulation/crossover-office-pro-bin 20170515-09:23 mgorny
23
On 21/05/17 20:32, Kent Fredric wrote:
> But I'd also like a pony.
>
I'm hoping for a unicorn still ...
[apologies, resending as hit the wrong button in the Compose button..]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
binsSfjd9wdyD.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
On Sun, 21 May 2017 19:34:26 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Like, by not using eclasses and instead inlining all the stuff?
I'd personally suggest we endeavour towards making systems in place so
that the performance overheads of metadata generation is much lower, to
the point it can be done efficie
Michał Górny wrote:
>> If this is such a big problem, maybe we should be discussing how to
>> redesign things to improve it?
>
> Like, by not using eclasses and instead inlining all the stuff?
There are other ways.
One way to mitigate the problem might be to require that
eclasses contain some
#
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I would really appreciate if you cared to follow procedures for eclass
> changes. Most notably, if you at least bothered to either ping us *or*
> sent the patch to the mailing list beforehand.
>
> This eclass is used by almost 6700
On nie, 2017-05-21 at 11:29 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:46:54PM +, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> > Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hardware or more deltas to
> > > > download by users? Just wondering.
> > >
> > > Both.
> > >
> > > - End
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:46:54PM +, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Kent Fredric wrote:
> > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >
> >> Hardware or more deltas to
> >> download by users? Just wondering.
> >
> > Both.
> >
> > - End users using git end up having to do massive metadata-updates.
> > - Infra needs t
Kent Fredric wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> Hardware or more deltas to
>> download by users? Just wondering.
>
> Both.
>
> - End users using git end up having to do massive metadata-updates.
> - Infra needs to have massive hits to metadata regeneration
> - End users using rsync have to fet
On Tue, 16 May 2017 21:36:15 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Hardware or more deltas to
> download by users? Just wondering.
Both.
- End users using git end up having to do massive metadata-updates.
- Infra needs to have massive hits to metadata regeneration
- End users using rsync have to fetc
On nie, 2017-05-21 at 09:44 +0700, Alex Turbov wrote:
> When it'll be possible to start to use it?
>
I'll send a reply to the patch when it's committed. Usually takes
a week, unless somebody opposes.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
19 matches
Mail list logo
