On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > >> they > >> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev > >> maintainer in > >> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. > > > > Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be > > added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo > > developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) > > without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There > > are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few > > for which you are one of the maintainers. > > > That's nice. > > Could proxy-maint as a team maybe try to agree on such things so that > everyone is on the same page? It's a tiny bit annoying when the actions > of some contradict the suggested rules of others, while appearing as a > single team to the outside ...
I suspect it's likely a misunderstanding - without notification, all anyone from Proxy Maint sees is proxy-maint being removed. An E-Mail to proxy-maint@g.o explaining that you've spoken to and are taking over proxying of the package would make sure we know what's happening. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
