On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > > > they > > > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev > > > maintainer in > > > metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. > > > > Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be > > added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo > > developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) > > without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There > > are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few > > for which you are one of the maintainers. > > > > Just to clarify, this works only if the developer and proxied maintainer > agree on the terms. It's not 'I remove proxy-maint, and now force you to > work on my terms that do not fit you because reasons'.
That's why I used the phrase "work with". -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
