Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: dhcpcd-6.4.2 defaults to stable private ipv6 addresses

All, here is the second update from IRC today. I reworded the title and added more information to the body recommending that users adjust to the new configuration. William Title: dhcpcd >= 6.4.2 changes defaults for IPv6 Author: William Hubbs Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-07-17 Revisio

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: dhcpcd-6.4.2 defaults to stable private ipv6 addresses

All, I am reposting this because I got a couple of updates from IRC. Let me know what you think. Thanks, William Title: dhcpcd 6.4.2 defaults to stable private IPv6 addresses Author: William Hubbs Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-07-17 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Install

[gentoo-dev] news item: dhcpcd-6.4.2 defaults to stable private ipv6 addresses

All, this is a newsitem I want to post for the newest dhcpcd in the nesxt few days. I'm not interested in commenting out "slaac private" in the new dhcpcd.conf by default, because as you will see in the references, there are good reasons to keep that setting. However, what I would like to know is

Re: [gentoo-dev] The request to abolish games team policy

Rich Freeman: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> Rich, if I may have a suggestion, it would be that instead of meddling >> with projects that have been doing their best with what they have for >> years, and which need praise rather than hindrance, you instead start >> a pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy

Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov: > В письме от Пт, 11 июля 2014 16:24:38 пользователь hasufell написал: > >> However, basically having only a single person that actively does such >> reviews + no official overlay makes it hard for contributors. > > As I said previously, you (and any developer else) are

[gentoo-dev] PSA: ruby_targets_ruby21 masked on stable

I added the following entry to profiles/base/use.stable.mask: # dev-lang/ruby:2.1 is not stable. ruby_targets_ruby21 This is needed for , as otherwise rexical would generate the following repoman error: dependency.bad18 dev-rub

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Returning dev: Thomas Alan Gall (tgall)

Welcome back! :) On 07/14/2014 04:26 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original > bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days. > > He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Returning dev: Thomas Alan Gall (tgall)

Welcome back to the jungle! :) On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:26:17 +0200 "Justin (jlec)" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original > bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days. > > He is joining the arm team now and wil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Returning dev: Thomas Alan Gall (tgall)

On 7/14/14, 10:26 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote: > we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original > bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days. > > He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64, > where he already started to work wi

[gentoo-dev] Returning dev: Thomas Alan Gall (tgall)

Hi everyone, we have an returning oldtimer here, Thomas Gall aka. tgall. His original bug has been opened in 2003, so he knows gentoo from the early days. He is joining the arm team now and will stabilize mostly for arm64, where he already started to work with a rate of > 10 pkgs/day. Happy days