On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 02:55 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
>
> dev-libs/commonc++ doesn't compile with gcc 3.4, and isn't depended
> upon by anything. The replacement is dev-cpp/commoncpp2. Unless someone
> screams soon I'll package.mask and remove.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:05AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> >Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to C++
> >users:
> >
> >~ DEPENDS="gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1"
> >
> >Comments?
> >
>
> what about
>
> DEPENDS="gentoo-foo/foo-bar/baz-2.1"
No, screws over >1 depth
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
dev-libs/commonc++ doesn't compile with gcc 3.4, and isn't depended
upon by anything. The replacement is dev-cpp/commoncpp2. Unless someone
screams soon I'll package.mask and remove.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brai
Danny van Dyk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner schrieb:
|>>The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
|>>unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
|>>whether it's user-assigned. The former is clearly the more sensi
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Like I said in a previous email, 'gentoo' corresponds to 'magic-chicken' in
your news-magic-chicken.unread files. The news reader app gets the repo
identifier from the news-*.unread files and plugs that into portageq to get the
directory where the corresponding new items c
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > What the heck is this 'gentoo' thing, and how does it help? Shoving
| > newsdir into portageq doesn't help *at all* with multiple repository
| > support.
|
| Like I said in a previous email, 'gent
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > What the heck is this 'gentoo' thing, and how does it help? Shoving
| > newsdir into portageq doesn't help *at all* with multiple repository
| > support.
|
| Like I said in a previous email, 'gentoo' corresponds to
| 'mag
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:42:53 -0500 Dan Meltzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Why not $(portageq newsdir) ? Currently, that would return only the
| one for main tree, but if/whenever multi repo support it added, it
| could return a space delimted list. This makes it simple to manage,
| and lets the
On 12/16/05, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > | Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary
> > | at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42
> > | doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this g
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary
| at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42
| doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this game
| and just settle on something like newsdir="$(portageq new
Why not $(portageq newsdir) ? Currently, that would return only the
one for main tree, but if/whenever multi repo support it added, it
could return a space delimted list. This makes it simple to manage,
and lets the portage crew
a) figure out what they want to do
b) implement it while keeping thi
Following the bugzilla upgrade, looks like email is now setting a field
procmail can filter on. so, ah, thanks! 'cause i know this bugzilla
upgrade was all secretly to satisfy me ;)
~mcummings, advocate of saving jforman from further torment without a
good cause, like sheer fun or something
--
g
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:18:45 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I get it. The Portage team asks you to extend your spec, so you turn
| it around and ask them to extend their spec. Ha ha ha. Funny
| game. :)
No no no. The Portage team asked me to extend GLEP 42 to include support
for
Here, have a goat.
It's on me
no, literally, get it off!
On 12/16/05, Jeffrey Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To all,
>
> After blowing my upgrade window by almost 2 hours bugzilla is back up,
> albeit missing the pretty Gentoo theme. I will be putting that in after
> I've taken a break, beca
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Local news delivery *should* still be using the user label. Unique
| repo internal labels don't matter to glep42, since the label that
| news delivery _should_ use is what the user's configuration has named
| it.
|
| Just stating it, since tagging a unique id into the
To all,
After blowing my upgrade window by almost 2 hours bugzilla is back up,
albeit missing the pretty Gentoo theme. I will be putting that in after
I've taken a break, because this upgrade was NOT FUN.
First and foremost I want to thank some people over in #mozwebtools on
irc.mozilla.org for t
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:12:08 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| What's needed is an extension of the portage configuration so that
| it's able to specify multiple standalone repos, slaved (overlay)
| repos chained against the standalones, package.* filters applied to
| each repo, etc
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to
| C++ users:
|
| ~ DEPENDS="gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1"
That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I switched
to postfix to make i
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:19:41 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > DEPEND=">=foo-bar/baz-2.1::ciaranmssekritrepo"
| >
| > which would add a restriction that only packages in
| > ciaranmssekritrepo would be considered. This only works if the
| > repository knows its own identifier, howev
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 11:14 -0500, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> To all,
>
> Once again, it's time to attempt the bugzilla-2.20 upgrade on
> bugs.gentoo.org. I've tested this at home, and spoken to the bugzilla
> maintainers and it seems the issue I had earlier with the upgrade is
> easily remedied. I'v
On Friday 16 December 2005 14:57, Alec Warner wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:36:54 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > | emerge blar --repo=ciaranmssekritrepo
> > |
> > | This accomplishes the same thing, except I get to name the repo
> > | whatever
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Possible proposal: the current council meeting rules be updated with
> one of the following two clauses:
>
>>Each person at a council meeting may represent only one voting role.
>
> Or:
>
>>A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
>>may not b
4am, pardon typos...
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:56:30AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
>
> The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner schrieb:
|>>The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
|>>unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
|>>whether it's user-assigned. The former is clearly the more sensible
|>>option, since i
24 matches
Mail list logo
