-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:36:54 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | emerge blar --repo=ciaranmssekritrepo
> |
> | This accomplishes the same thing, except I get to name the repo
> | whatever I wish, and you lose th
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:36:54 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| emerge blar --repo=ciaranmssekritrepo
|
| This accomplishes the same thing, except I get to name the repo
| whatever I wish, and you lose the ability to specify repositories in
| DEPEND.
...and it stops you from being abl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
>
> The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
> unique identi
Curtis Napier wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
unique identifier string (for example, in meta
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
w
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature?
The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
whether it's user-assigned
uncil/meeting-logs/20051215.txt
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
As i sit reading the current list of list emails about GLEP 42 I see
that the topic of Multiple Repos coming up over and over again. I wanted
to ask to see where that support is, and based on what feedback help
move along so that a standard can be produced. So, now with a few short
questions:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:20:36PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Possible proposal: the current council meeting rules be updated with
> one of the following two clauses:
>
> > A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
> > may not be a proxy for more than one person at
Possible proposal: the current council meeting rules be updated with
one of the following two clauses:
> Each person at a council meeting may represent only one voting role.
Or:
> A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
> may not be a proxy for more than one person
Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:13:34AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
There was a tip in the GWN about
turning on dir_index on an already formatted file system. If formatting
a new one, just use mkfs.ext2 -J -O dir_index /dev/$whatever to create
your file system.
Good thing
On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:48, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
> of a Gentoo system.
> Overoptimization (the well known "-O9 -fomgomg" CFLAGS etc.) tends to
> make things unstable, which is of course not what we want. Th
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:13:34AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> CFQ is much worse for a desktop system. I tend to like deadline for
> playing games. These can probably make a bit more difference than a new
> -fomg-itsofast-and-broken-math added to CFLAGS.
That's funny, i switched from defaul
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:03:59 +0100:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 16:43, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> [talking about -Os if I'm right]
>> I've seen some reproducable breakage, e.g. KDE doesn't like it at all
> Actually, I'm runnin
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> -user has the risk of many "use teh -fomglol flag, it si teh fast0r" ;-)
> hardened doesn't have much to do with performance (although I'd be
> interested what impact - if any - the different security features have!)
fresh of typing (but worked on for few months)
http://www.
On 12/15/05, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any application-specific tweaks (e.g. "use the prefork MPM
> > > with apache2")? [...]
> > is'n there "ab" [1] for apache testing ?
> Yes, but that's apache specific and is quite hard to use correctly.
Isn't that what you asked?
On Thursday 15 December 2005 16:43, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> [talking about -Os if I'm right]
> I've seen some reproducable breakage, e.g. KDE doesn't like it at all
Actually, I'm running KDE with -Os right now...
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gen
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:43 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> having more than one disk or a lot of memory add very interesting
> addition, read raid 0 (stripe) or tmpfs for working data that does'nt
> need a backup fex: $PORTIR, /var/tmp ...
tmpfs has miserable performance when larger than RAM iirc
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 13:48 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
> of a Gentoo system.
for package in $system_packages; do
profile_application $package
eliminate_bottlenecks $package
submit_patch_upstream $
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Lauer wrote:
| On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:43 -0700, Duncan wrote:
|>This really belongs on user, or perhaps on the appropriate purposed list,
|>desktop or hardened or whatever, not on devel. That said, some
|>comments... (I can't resist. )
|
|
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:43 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
> > of a Gentoo system.
> This really belongs on user, or perhaps on the appropriate purposed list,
> desktop or hardened or whatever, not on devel. That said, some
> comment
No, only the config files that are in a stage 3 should be left, some of
those will be edited and some will have been upgraded so they should be
left. It would be like emerge --unmerge --shallow world to take you
back the that original state so then any major changes could be made
without reinstalli
Patrick Lauer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:48:05 +0100:
> I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
> of a Gentoo system.
This really belongs on user, or perhaps on the appropriate purposed list,
desktop or hardened or whatever,
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 13:48 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> - don't overtweak CFLAGS. "-O2 -march=$your_cpu_family" seems to be on
> average the best, -O3 is often slower and can cause bugs
-O2 -march=$your_cpu_family -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
-pipe
Use pipes rather than temporary files fo
On Thursday 15 December 2005 14:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Some upstreams, mostly media related but also unsuspectable like MySQL,
> use and test their apps with high optimizations.
Not exactly true.. many media related upstreams forces "ricing" flags
(-fomg-so-fast) on packages, but that does n
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
> of a Gentoo system.
> Overoptimization (the well known "-O9 -fomgomg" CFLAGS etc.) tends to
> make things unstable, which is of course not what we want. The "easy"
> way out would be buying
Hi all,
I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
of a Gentoo system.
Overoptimization (the well known "-O9 -fomgomg" CFLAGS etc.) tends to
make things unstable, which is of course not what we want. The "easy"
way out would be buying faster hardware, but that is usuall
27 matches
Mail list logo
