Mike Frysinger wrote:
glanced in the ebuilds and they dont look too bad to me ... this is how we do
avr after all ... we punted the avr gcc/binutils ebuilds and now people have
to `emerge crossdev && crossdev avr`
Ok, many thanks Mike for the input.
I guess I better get on with it!
Stefan
On Thursday 13 October 2005 08:16 pm, Stefan Jones wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote:
> >>dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime
> >>dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api
> >
> >i'd prefer to see these moved into the nor
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote:
dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime
dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api
i'd prefer to see these moved into the normal binutils/gcc ebuilds myself
I do not think that would ev
Hi everybody,
Please don't start flaming me for this proposal, it's a discussion.
Now, we have in tree app-arch/bsdtar and app-arch/tar (gnu tar) that are
syntax compatible and can actually work fine on Gentoo/Linux or
Gentoo/FreeBSD or anything Gentoo/*..
Now they are probably the only two of
Hi,
I want to preinstall Gentoo Linux on some devices for customers. Do
you have any tips for preinstallation, any scripts? What is the
correct prcedure of doing so?
Anyone knows of something like a "sysprep" script for linux that will
ask the costumer for user and passwort setup when he first sw
Dave Nebinger wrote:
I may be a bit of-base, but since I don't know much about the ruby gems, I'm
wondering how close of a situation this is with the perl cpan modules?
They're integrated to operate using the distribution process of both cpan and
portage...
They are similar. There is a pr
Yeah, I know...
need to check which adress I used for subscription...
--
Benjamin Judas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: [Thu Oct 13 2005, 01:37:32PM CDT]
> Problem is that this would mean replace it with another GLEP then
> because it changes basically everything.
I would rather it be replaced by another GLEP, personally. Just yanking
it isn't sufficient, since it doesn't solve
On Friday 07 October 2005 14:25, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to get with the GLEP authors and propose a
> revision of the GLEP, since the concept is still the same "Gentoo ALT
> KEYWORDS", to make it fit better with the current situation?
Problem is that this would mean re
On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote:
> dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime
> dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api
i'd prefer to see these moved into the normal binutils/gcc ebuilds myself
> But every so often people submit ebuild for other libraries
Just a few opinions from the outside looking in...
On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote:
> I am just wondering about people's option about making a new category,
> called something like dev-xmingw or similar.
Wouldn't set a precident for dev-gcc, dev-icc, dev-[enter alternate
Hi all,
I am just wondering about people's option about making a new category,
called something like dev-xmingw or similar.
At the moment we have in portage:
dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime
dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api
Which gives a usable W32 toolchain
Fixed in 2.4.2 according to their Changelog.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Lares Moreau wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 23:41 -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote:
There is a memory leak in python-2.4.1 so 2.4.2 was marked
stable on x86.
Is the memory leak specif
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 23:41 -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote:
> There is a memory leak in python-2.4.1 so 2.4.2 was marked
> stable on x86.
Is the memory leak specific to python-2.4.1? Or is it still present in
2.4.*?
>
> There isn't much listed in the changelog[1] upstream such
> as a patch or bug#, bu
14 matches
Mail list logo
