I guess knowing where the meeting will be held might help attendance
a little...
#gentoo-alt it is!
--Kito
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if
possible the packages cd (for a quick result) .
I have an athlon 1133. I am re-building it after a root account
compromise (don't ask or I'll cry).
According to the release announcement the package cd's don't seem to
have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kito wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On behalf of the g/fbsd and macos teams, I'd like to call a meeting
> for all members of the gentoo-alt projects (and anyone else who would
> like to attend) on Monday September 26 at 19:00 UTC.
>
> Items on the Agend
On Friday 16 September 2005 05:51, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Regarding GLEP 31, the council is in favor of enforcement ASAP,
> provided nano is confirmed to be capable of compliance. That will set
> the bar to require UTF-8 capable editors for portage work.
Confirmed.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpeTCg9uOJs
Greetings,
On behalf of the g/fbsd and macos teams, I'd like to call a
meeting for all members of the gentoo-alt projects (and anyone else
who would like to attend) on Monday September 26 at 19:00 UTC.
Items on the Agenda so far:
* Naming and categorization of alt-arch system packages
On Thursday 15 September 2005 05:57 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:25 -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> > - Does it mean that devs who are not part of the x86 team can't move
> > packages from ~x86 to x86 ?
>
> Correct. They can, however, make previous arrangements with the x86
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:25 -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> What does that glep mean anyways ? Appart from the creation of the x86
> team, is there any action to be taken?
> - Is the maint keyword approved?
No. It was a suggestion, but was never added to the GLEP.
> - Does it mean that devs who ar
On Thu, 2005-15-09 at 16:51 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > 3. glep40: Standardizing "arch" keywording across all archs
> >Vote asked by Grant Goodyear
>
> Approved.
What does that glep mean anyways ? Appart from the creation of the x86
team, is there any action to be taken?
- Is the maint key
g available at
http://gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20050915.txt
Please post follow-ups to gentoo-council ML (subscription required)
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpFWsVRuq3Fp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 15 September 2005 01:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have two new developers from Poland.
It's creepy... we have also a polish invasion in #gentoo-bsd ...
Well... welcome nelchael and mkay... hope you won't find too many [EMAIL
PROTECTED] bugs
laying around :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:42:19AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Nathan L. Adams wrote:
>
> > What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis
> > Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and
> > Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive.
>
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
> What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis
> Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and
> Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive.
The idea behind -infra temporary revoke power is to react to emergency
situa
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:52:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please give them a warm welcome :)
Ok, here's a warm welcome to nelchael and mkay. Would you like fries
with it?
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.or
13 matches
Mail list logo
