Nathan L. Adams wrote: > What about giving QA temporary revoke powers just like infra (Curtis > Napier's idea), traditionalist? Fixing devrel's resolutions policies and > Curtis' idea don't have to be mutually-exclusive.
The idea behind -infra temporary revoke power is to react to emergency situations (as in "we must do something *now*"). Not sure a repeated QA violation would fall into that "emergency" category. The solution is rather to have a devrel liaison inside the QA team (or the other way around). These are not closed groups. We do essentially the same with infrastructure and security, we have liaisons and people that are members of both groups, rather than saying security should have wheel to do security audits and "emergency security fixes". Works a lot better that way. -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
