-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:04 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
|
|>I'm asking because I will need to modify the livecd-tools scripts to
|>take into account a way to disable DHCP when either "nodhcp" or
|>"nodetect" are passed to the
On Monday 23 May 2005 18:12, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> This can't be done everytime, and hoping for, in future, having an
> universal eject (libcdio should allow that) I wanted to ask if is possible
> to add a virtual/eject provided by sys-apps/eject and sys-apps/eject-bsd so
> that they c
Marcus D. Hanwell posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:36 +0100:
> It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains
> some more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting
> proper visibility support. We haven't taken th
Roy Marples posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 13:22:43 +0100:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 02:08 -0700, Duncan wrote:
>> Hmm.. I /did/ have issues with parallel startup a couple revisions
>> back. I had disabled that and haven't reenabled it yet. I suppose I
>> should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody!
I'd just like to inform all of you who patiently waited for news in
regard to Intel Compiler support for Gentoo, that karltk and I just
commited some of the latest versions of the "Intel(R) C++ Compiler"
(dev-lang/icc-8.1.030) and the
Peter Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>Try to uncomment preup() function for /etc/conf.d/net. Link detection
>was not very reliable in my case, but it might be just because I'm using
>software suspend.
That is working like a charm! It's booting now as fast as before. Thanks!
Lars
--
need Grou
On 26/5/2005 15:33:10, Roy Marples ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:04 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > I'm trying it on a laptop that connects to various different networks
> > depending on the weather. I figured this would be a useful test as
> > it's a less common configu
On 5/26/05, Caleb Tennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:30 am, Duncan wrote:
> > So the KDE problem... Is that what's causing all those virtual function
> > but destructor isn't virtual type warnings whenever I compile a KDE ebuild
> > with gcc4?
>
> No, that's just shodd
On Thursday 26 May 2005 11:12 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:04 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > I'm asking because I will need to modify the livecd-tools scripts to
> > > take into account a way to disable DHCP
On Thursday 26 May 2005 16:03, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Alec Warner wrote:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > > >Thus you can do cool stuff like print debug info, over-ride default
> > > >functions, and otherwise other fun stuff that normally would be a
> > > >complete
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:04 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > I'm asking because I will need to modify the livecd-tools scripts to
> > take into account a way to disable DHCP when either "nodhcp" or
> > "nodetect" are passed to the release
On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:04 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I'm asking because I will need to modify the livecd-tools scripts to
> take into account a way to disable DHCP when either "nodhcp" or
> "nodetect" are passed to the release media.
speaking of livecd updates, someone pointed out on a bug
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - the net scripts have been completely rewritten thanks to UberLord ... old
> config styles should work fine, but it's best if you update
> your /etc/conf.d/net syntax ... just review /etc/conf.d/net.example or this
> URL: http://dev.gen
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - the net scripts have been completely rewritten thanks to UberLord ... old
> config styles should work fine, but it's best if you update
> your /etc/conf.d/net syntax ... just review /etc/conf.d/net.example or this
> URL: http://dev.gen
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 10:49 pm, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Thursday 26 May 2005 07:45 am, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> >>I get a message * /sbin/rc cannot start until runlevel boot has completed
> >>this is an a ppc platform...
> >
> >search bugzilla, this has come up ... i t
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Thursday 26 May 2005 07:45 am, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
>
>
>>I get a message * /sbin/rc cannot start until runlevel boot has completed
>>this is an a ppc platform...
>>
>>
>
>search bugzilla, this has come up ... i think it's because of some init script
>you have in
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:04 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> I'm trying it on a laptop that connects to various different networks
> depending on the weather. I figured this would be a useful test as
> it's a less common configuration. It connects mostly via different
> docking stations. I use
On 26/5/2005 0:20:02, Mike Frysinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> files - the net scripts have been completely rewritten thanks to UberLord
Ahh; what fun - that was the stuff I'd tweaked the most :/
The new network stuff is much better, but I do have one hiccough.
I'm trying it on a laptop that c
On Thursday 26 May 2005 07:45 am, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> I get a message * /sbin/rc cannot start until runlevel boot has completed
> this is an a ppc platform...
search bugzilla, this has come up ... i think it's because of some init script
you have in the boot runlevel when it should be in the
* On May 25 18:20, Mike Frysinger (gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they
> notice any regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and
> seeing if your system comes up :)
Working great here on ~x86, aside from the initia
On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:30 am, Duncan wrote:
> So the KDE problem... Is that what's causing all those virtual function
> but destructor isn't virtual type warnings whenever I compile a KDE ebuild
> with gcc4?
No, that's just shoddy C++ coding that also needs to be fixed.
Caleb
--
gentoo-dev@g
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 02:08 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Hmm.. I /did/ have issues with parallel startup a couple revisions back.
> I had disabled that and haven't reenabled it yet. I suppose I should do
> that and bug it now, if it still fails. It /was/ working at one point.
There may still be issu
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 05:55 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Does it support wireless devices that don't support essid scanning yet?
>
> I'm currently having to use baselayout-1.10.4 (which was removed from portage
> ages ago) as my BCM4306 802.11b/g chip (used via ndiswrapper) doesn't support
> essid
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 05:55 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Does it support wireless devices that don't support essid scanning yet?
>
> I'm currently having to use baselayout-1.10.4 (which was removed from portage
> ages ago) as my BCM4306 802.11b/g chip (used via ndiswrapper) doesn't support
> essid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
> get
> new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
>
> so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice
> any
> regression
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to get
>new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
>
>so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any
>regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if
Thanks for the help! I put it here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94060
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 11:12, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Well, first off, how does the program look for the perl modules? If it
> isn't suggesting that you place them in your @INC, then it is most likely
> loading th
On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:37, Duncan wrote:
> Marcus D. Hanwell posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
>
> below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100:
> > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that
> > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the
> > p
works perfectly here. good work. I like the new network setup.
when do you thing it changes from ~x86 to x86.
On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
> get new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
>
> so c
Thanks, but unfortunately it is not on CPAN.
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 23:32, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Rene Zbinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript
> > (mainprog.pl) which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm
> > module2.pm)
> >
> > I will
Mike Frysinger posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 18:20:02 -0400:
> can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any
> regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your
> system comes up :)
I've been running baselay
lo,
On Thursday 26 May 2005 08:35, Peter Cech wrote:
[snip]
> Try to uncomment preup() function for /etc/conf.d/net. Link detection
> was not very reliable in my case, but it might be just because I'm using
> software suspend.
software suspend works perfectly with this. The problem is more likely
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:10:18AM +, Lars Kneschke wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
> >get
> >new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
>
> I just tested with a LVM system and it worked like i
Dan Armak posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 07:25:21 +0300:
> That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden
> visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling
> visibility support in kde. (There was a separate
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alec Warner wrote:
[...snip...]
> > >Thus you can do cool stuff like print debug info, over-ride default
> > >functions, and otherwise other fun stuff that normally would be a
> > >complete PITA, especially if you don't know portage internals well.
>
> N
35 matches
Mail list logo
