Marcus D. Hanwell posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:36 +0100:
> It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains > some more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting > proper visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I > believe it is the best option we have for a stable desktop. > > KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be > testing them once it is workable and I have a little spare time Yes, I'm pretty much resigned to having to wait until kde4 for proper gcc4 support, but am /really/ looking forward to that! BTW, it's a bit off topic for this thread, but if there's someplace you could point me to with updated info on what's happening to arts and/or what's going to be replacing it in kde4, I know quite a number of folks that are interested. It seems I knew more than most when the topic came up in at least two groups (the amd64 list, and the local *ix group here at Cox), but my info is now severely outdated, since most of it is from last year's aKademy coverage and the like, when the only thing really settled was that 3.4 would continue to use ARTS and they would look at a replacement for 4.0. Now that 4.0 is getting closer, one would hope the kde4 sound question has been resolved rather more concretely than that, and as I said, I know a lot of folks (certainly myself included) that will be interested in learning more about whatever has been concluded. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
