Jan Kundrát wrote:
Omer Cohen wrote:
we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities.
...and the same community whose members write code like that described
in PHP's bug 31261 [1], which seems quite ugly, at least to me.
My point is that even if developers say their code is stable,
Collins Richey wrote:
On 4/23/05, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to bugzilla, there are lots of open bugs (132 to be exact)
containing the word 'php' in the summary. From a quick glimpse many of
them seem related to php-5.
Looks like your're 100% right. One user d
> Aside from that, kindly check the failed fetches on the list. If one
> of your ebuilds is in that list, either no valid URI could be found,
> or you doffed the SRC_URI for it (mirror:// w/out a mirror has been
> common).
The following from the list report no valid uri although they WORKFORME.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Hola all.
[snip]
under 'Deletions for Sunday May 01 2005'
unknown:
portage-2.0.51.20.tar.bz2 sandbox-1.2.tar.bz2
Perhaps a major glitch here, since portage-2.0.51.20 is the latest version?
Also, will the script be re-run bef
On Sat, 2005-23-04 at 23:29 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
> | removed from the mirrors network.
>
> I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 p
I played around with Squeak a while back. The license is non-free
according to the folks who work with Richard Stallman. It's an
interesting environment, but I wasn't willing to learn Smalltalk in
order to use it, nor was I willing to adopt their style, their GUI, etc.
So ... I won't jump up and do
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
| removed from the mirrors network.
I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 people thought about this
at all?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Develop
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:32 +0200
> Spider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However,
> > feedback would be nice, patches and so on.
>
> I think that for binaries you
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > A quicky report of flies that'll be ixnayed is available at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/failure.xml
>
> Thanks for making that page! I just searched it and found two packages I
> cared about with
dev-lang/squeak
dev-lang/squeak-basicimage
dev-lang/squeak-fullimage
Though im not a squeak expert, ive used it myself several times, so,
If nobody else wants these, i can take care of them.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> A quicky report of flies that'll be ixnayed is available at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/failure.xml
Thanks for making that page! I just searched it and found two packages I
cared about with wrong SRC_URI's, fixed one and
Hi folks,
I emerge xmms about a week ago, and it's worked great once I got the audio
working on my laptop.
Yesterday I tried to emerge the eq-xmms plugin, and it kept failing because it
didn't know where to find xmms's "Effect" directory. I had to manually untar,
./configure with a --libdir switc
Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
> Sometimes happen to write lines of code not well written, not clear and
> still working.
> Simply that, sometimes happen, don't make of such an accident a thing
> bigger than it is.
>
The "problem" is that they ignore polite bugreport *with* attached solution.
I hope
On 4/23/05, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to bugzilla, there are lots of open bugs (132 to be exact)
> containing the word 'php' in the summary. From a quick glimpse many of
> them seem related to php-5.
>
Looks like your're 100% right. One user does not a stable re
Jan Kundrát wrote:
>Omer Cohen wrote:
>
>
>>we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities.
>>
>>
>
>
>...and the same community whose members write code like that described
>in PHP's bug 31261 [1], which seems quite ugly, at least to me.
>
>
>My point is that even if developers say t
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> >Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
> >removed from the mirrors network. Either
> >
> >A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors
> >B) RESTRICT="fetch" is
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:48:38 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 08:42 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > USE_EXPAND is now available to be set in the profiles.
| > I would like to use it to allow only downloading the needed drivers
| > in SRC_URI
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 08:42 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>USE_EXPAND is now available to be set in the profiles.
>>I would like to use it to allow only downloading the needed drivers in
>>SRC_URI when FRITZCAPI_CARDS or FCDSL_CARDS is set.
>>Any comments
Brian Harring wrote:
>Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
>removed from the mirrors network. Either
>
>A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors
>B) RESTRICT="fetch" is set for the ebuild. We don't mirror those
> files.
>C) RESTRICT="mirro
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 08:42 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> USE_EXPAND is now available to be set in the profiles.
> I would like to use it to allow only downloading the needed drivers in
> SRC_URI when FRITZCAPI_CARDS or FCDSL_CARDS is set.
> Any comments or objections?
>
> See http://b
Omer Cohen wrote:
> we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities.
...and the same community whose members write code like that described
in PHP's bug 31261 [1], which seems quite ugly, at least to me.
My point is that even if developers say their code is stable, it doesn't
have to mean
Hola all.
So mirror-dist is ready to go, infra side of it being set for a final
testing run then switching it live if things go fine after next
weekend.
Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be
removed from the mirrors network. Either
A) no ebuild claims that distfil
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:32 +0200
Spider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However,
> feedback would be nice, patches and so on.
I think that for binaries you could filter the ldd output to keep
only the libs that are directly linked to, since
Why not reverse it:
1. *DONT* unmerge an old lib (the *.so.* file) if the soname changes due
an upgrade. Just leave this single file on the file-system
2. Scan your system in regular intervals for unused old shared libs
This seems much simpler and doesn't break systems.
Jürgen
> Well, thi
Well, this is something I spent quite a bit of time on yesterday, with
some help from bonsaikitten on figuring out the python madness.
Before ferringb tells it again, no, I know this isn't foolproof, cannot
be 100% in coverage, won't cover dlopen, conditional includes, bash
source inherit or oth
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 01:59 -0700, D. Wokan wrote:
> Well then as one of hopefully lots of people, let me chime in with a
> "PHP5 is working for me as well." How is it developers determine if
> something's stable? A lack of bug reports from those of us who added
> entries in our /etc/port
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:34:36 +0200 Francesco Riosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Quite a lot has changed between PHP 4.3.x and 5.0.x. Apparently,
| > things like classes are totally different. The classes in PHP 5
| > more closely resemble Java than the ones in PHP 4.
|
|
27 matches
Mail list logo
