On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:32 +0200 > Spider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However, > > feedback would be nice, patches and so on. > > I think that for binaries you could filter the ldd output to keep > only the libs that are directly linked to, since that's what > should really become dependencies. See atttached patch for a > possible quick and dirty implementation.
Thanks, Applied said quick&dirty implementation, committing as well :) //Spider -- begin .signature Tortured users / Laughing in pain See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
