Re: Click Incubation - Status

2008-07-28 Thread bob
s not submit an ICLA and we have to rewrite his contributions how do we go about it? I can understand rewriting classes, but what about small patches of 3-5 lines? Kind regards Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: JIRA @ ASF (was: Re: policy question)

2003-08-21 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I don't really see the need though. Bob is doing a fine job hosting JIRA > on werken.com. I'm sure that backups to ASF hardware could be arranged > if that were really an issue. Thanks. We do backup offsite on a nightly basis, also. > But if a) Bob would like

[VOTE] Release Click 2.1.0-RC1

2009-06-20 Thread Bob Schellink
://incubator.apache.org/click/ Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/click.html kind regards bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Click 2.1.0-RC1

2009-07-04 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi all, The vote ends with the following result: 3 +1 and no other votes. +1 Ted Husted (binding) +1 Will Glass-Husain (binding) +1 Henning Schmiedehausen (binding) The vote passes and the distribution will be uploaded to '/dist/incubator/click/' Kind regards

Re: Incorrect use of "Sponsor".

2009-07-04 Thread Bob Schellink
Thanks for the clarification Niclas. I'll update the site. Kind regards Bob Niclas Hedhman wrote: Click community, you are not allowed to use "Commercial Sponsors" promotion on your website; http://incubator.apache.org/click/docs/click-online.html Only "substa

[HEADS-UP] Apache Click graduation

2009-09-26 Thread Bob Schellink
Adrian Antal as a new committer and two of our mentors, Will and Henning, have indicated they will stay on as PMC members after graduation. Kind regards Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

[VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

2009-10-17 Thread Bob Schellink
proposed board resolution is included below. Kind regards Bob [1]: http://markmail.org/thread/nhhocnq3xufm3lkt [2]: http://markmail.org/message/pwgo2duk6oens7v6 --- Begin Proposed Board Resolution --- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

2009-10-19 Thread Bob Schellink
Also note that he has raised ~20 JIRA's, most with patches that have been applied to trunk. Hope this clears things up. Kind regards Bob [1]: http://www.ohloh.net/p/11242/contributors/48286170006745 [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

2009-10-20 Thread Bob Schellink
Jukka Zitting wrote: I assume he'll be a candidate also for PMC membership if he keeps up contributing. Yes, every few months we'll review our current committers for PMC membership. Kind regards Bob - To unsu

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

2009-10-21 Thread Bob Schellink
Bob Schellink wrote: I would like to start a vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Click as a Top Level Project to the Board. The vote has passed with 10 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Here are the votes: +1 Andrus Adamchik +1 Jim Jagielski +1 Will Glass-Husain +1 Craig

Re: 'Handling Crypto..' - River project

2007-10-24 Thread Bob Scheifler
Jim Hurley wrote: Just to be clear, the Sun release was not a product, but rather an open source (Apache 2 license) release. I could be wrong, but I don't think it was handled as a commercial product. You are correct.

[VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-03-10 Thread Bob Buffone
://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/0.5.0-incubator/ Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Release is approved [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Thank you, Bob (Buffone) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-03-11 Thread Bob Buffone
-Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incubator PM, > > The XAP team has

RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-03-13 Thread Bob Buffone
-Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:01 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message

RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-03-15 Thread Bob Buffone
system to work. Bob (Buffone) -Original Message- From: James Margaris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:56 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release That particular Rhino jar is the same one we've been using

RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-03-16 Thread Bob Buffone
distribution files would simplify things for users of the XAP codebase. Bob (Buffone) -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:29 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release On 13/03/2008, Bob

[VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-04-07 Thread Bob Buffone
the release (provide specific comments) Thank you, Bob (Buffone) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release

2008-04-07 Thread Bob Buffone
-Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:39 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release On 07/04/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incubator PM, > > The XAP team

[VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Schellink
+1 votes (4 binding) and no other votes: Andrus Adamchik +1 Bob Schellink +1 Naoki Takezoe +1 Malcolm Edgar +1 Ricardo Lecheta +1 Vote thread: http://click.markmail.org/search/#query:+page:1+mid:3t5lfsusnizffj4t+state:results Distribution can be found here: http://people.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Schellink
thus have no Apache headers. Is this OK? Kind regards bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Schellink
/~sabob/click/click/2.0.1/dist/ New Maven artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~sabob/click/click/2.0.1/maven2/ Thanks Bob Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 4, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see an incubator DISCLAIM

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click

2009-02-10 Thread Bob Schellink
. I'll fix these issues and republish shortly. Can we get fired for trying to release so many times? kind regards bob [1]: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator

[VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-10 Thread Bob Schellink
Maven artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~sabob/click/click/2.0.1/maven2/ Thanks Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread Bob Schellink
from resource checkstyletask.properties. It could not be found. The checkstyle taskdef is globally defined and should be moved inside the checkstyle target. Will have this resolved before next release as well. Thanks. bob -

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-15 Thread Bob Schellink
Will Glass-Husain wrote: +1 Quick question, does the PMC votes from previous release attempts (the first and second try) count towards this cut? In other words does Andrus and Kevan's votes from the previous attempt count? Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Suspending Projects -- XAP

2009-02-18 Thread Bob Buffone
throughout the process, Bob (Buffone) On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin < robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > >> Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> > In Au

[VOTE] [RESULT] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-18 Thread Bob Schellink
time taken to evaluate the distro. kind regards bob Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available with the following changes: # build.properties has new property to switch off the hibernate dependency # build.xml will only build the hibernate package if hibernate is available on the

Maven for incubating projects

2009-02-19 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi all, Seems there was a recent update in policy that incubator projects can be pushed to the central repository? So we can copy Click maven artifacts to '/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/click/'? kind re

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Pivot 1.1

2009-04-10 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi Todd, +1 (non-binding) Checked the following: - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER is in place - RAT report looks good - Built with JDK 1.6, Windows XP, Ant 1.7 Looks good to go :) kind regards bob Todd Volkert wrote: Our voting period expires in less than 24 hours, and our two mentors

[PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

2009-04-23 Thread Bob Schellink
page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/click.html Kind regards Bob --- Begin Proposed Board Resolution --- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Comm

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

2009-04-23 Thread Bob Schellink
actually joined the project at Apache because of personal health reasons. Kind regards Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

2009-04-24 Thread Bob Schellink
companies in different countries. Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: XAP (Extensible Ajax Platform) Proposal

2006-05-11 Thread Bob Buffone
place the need for JavaScript, just gives users options. JavaScript will be used to handle events on the client as well as build application UI under certain situations or because of personal preferences. Regards, Bob (Buffone) ---

Re: [Proposal] Jini Project

2006-06-22 Thread Bob Scheifler
Leo Simons wrote: > I guess this means keeping jini.org around for a long time to come, and I > think > this means you need a name for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" which is not "jini" :) Could you expand on why yo

Re: [Proposal] Jini Project

2006-06-22 Thread Bob Scheifler
re development site. We also now have a "Jini" community on java.net. Is the suggestion that the ASF project can't have "Jini" anywhere in its name, or that it can't be just the single word "Jini"? - Bob --

Re: [Proposal] Jini Project

2006-06-22 Thread Bob Scheifler
> I should also point you to the follow up :) > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=115092546912444&w=2 FWIW, that just emphasizes to me that the circumstances are different. - Bob - To unsub

Re: [Proposal] Jini Project

2006-06-23 Thread Bob Scheifler
that, I guess I've just explained to myself why the ASF project should not be merely "Jini", and should either have a different name or an additional qualifier. (As for trademark issues, I'll defer to Jim Hurley to chime in.) - Bob -

Re: Jini?

2006-08-10 Thread Bob Scheifler
reality is that lots of configuration files and startup scripts in the world make reference to things in the com.sun.jini namespace, so the impact would be felt there. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-14 Thread Bob Scheifler
munity standards process going forward. I think our best shot at success is a single podling, which maintains both specs and code under a single development process. (And as such, the specs would no longer be "standards".) - Bob -

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-14 Thread Bob Scheifler
ion to use the Apache License for Jini. I don't want to impose > any arbitrary barriers to acceptance into the Apache incubator, but > I'd like to see a wider discussion of abandoning the "standard". To my mind the wider discussions have already taken place with

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-14 Thread Bob Scheifler
must mean "ownership of" rather than merely "category of"? - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-14 Thread Bob Scheifler
ce plus javadoc", and an implementation as "Java class plus javadoc", they are both code plus doc, amenable to the same overall process. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-14 Thread Bob Scheifler
was a project called > "Apache Jini"? Absolutely! If there was already a project called Apache Jini, I think we'd be proposing to become part of it. Of course, as the guy who called it X, you might also decide that I don't worry too much about names. ;-) - Bob --

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
ng TLP names are different/OK: DB, Directory, Logging, Web Services, XML. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
k, and a list related to implementation. Are you making a suggestion about #2, #3, or both? Is my concern about #3 clear? - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
me understand the statement about there being a tradition of not using category names. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
Filip at Apache wrote: > jini is a trademark > directory isn't The question wasn't about Jini vs others. Geir said he wouldn't support "Apache EMail" or "Apache Web", and I'd like to understand how those two are different from "Ap

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
ec requires different skills than implementing that spec. I don't see how requiring different skills necessarily implies requiring different development processes. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
n't tell if your #1 implies that the notion of Jini standards disappears. I don't see a problem with an outcome in which the notion of Jini "standards" disappears, but the ASF project continues to maintain and develop APIs that others could also produce implementations of,

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
lated APIs. As a concrete example, we have an existing pair of Jini community standards (the Surrogate Architecture and the IP Interconnect for it) and an implementation (called Madison) that aren't being proposed for inclusion in the ASF project; they now exist in a project on java.net. - B

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
y disagreeing about the initial contributions for the project, but I don't think we have consensus on where the project should evolve to; I think that's something that gets worked on during incubation. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-15 Thread Bob Scheifler
t *the* as in "the only". > > I view it as being/becoming *the* Jini Community's touchstone (or main > commons). +1 - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-16 Thread Bob Scheifler
" and "doc" from a single source tree. We shifted to this style very deliberately (we started out doing specs as separate docs, and still have older specs in that form). - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-16 Thread Bob Scheifler
you expand on why you're against? (Aside: it's net.jini.*) - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

2006-08-16 Thread Bob Scheifler
much all of our existing users, though, so we're going to raise this over on the broader Jini community mailing lists to see what the general reaction to it is. - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: [VOTE] Incubate new podling, "River" (nee Braintree, nee..., nee Jini)

2006-12-21 Thread Bob Scheifler
Therefore, please vote on the proposal that follows : [X] +1 Accept River as a new podling - Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-02-10 Thread Bob Buffone
tremendous help. The release files can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/ Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Release is approved [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Thank you, Bob (Buffone) - To

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-02-13 Thread Bob Buffone
repository as well as the release archives. I will send out an email when this is complete and the file has been uploaded. Bob (Buffone) -Original Message- From: Kevan Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:25 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE

[VOTE] [RETRY] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-02-14 Thread Bob Buffone
se is approved [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Thank you, Bob (Buffone) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] [RETRY] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-02-20 Thread Bob Buffone
, Bob (Buffone) -Original Message- From: Bob Buffone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:38 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: xap-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] [RETRY] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0 Incubator, Several issues were found with the

[RESULT] was: [VOTE] [RETRY] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-02-24 Thread Bob Buffone
Rob Gagne +1 Trevor Oldak +1 Chandresh Turakhia There were 3 binding Incubator PMC +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. I will follow up this email with an official release announcement. Thanks for all the help, Bob (Buffone) - To

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-03-06 Thread Bob Buffone
ANNOUNCEMENT: The Apache XAP Team (XAP is an open source Ajax project at Apache Incubator) is pleased to announce the release of the 0.3.0 of its Declarative Ajax toolkit. Downloads of the project can be found at http://incubator.apache.org/xap/download.html Project Overview - XAP

RE: [RESULT] was: [VOTE] [RETRY] Release of Apache XAP 0.3.0

2007-03-08 Thread Bob Buffone
+1 on Robert's mentoring of the XAP project, we would not have released with out him. Bob (Buffone) -Original Message- From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:10 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] was: [VOTE] [RETRY] Re

Re: [VOTE] Retire HDT

2014-11-18 Thread Bob Kerns
> > 4pm CET. Let me know if you'd like to join! > > > > > > Evert > > > > > > On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 9:27:40 PM Evert Lammerts < > > evert.lamme...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Like Bob I would have liked to

[DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

2020-06-13 Thread Bob Paulin
dual licenses.  Has this ever required escalation to an actual Lawyer in Legal?  Or have these determinations been low enough risk that we are comfortable with our PMC making best effort decisions based on the ASF guidelines? - Bob [1] https:

Re: [DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

2020-06-15 Thread Bob Paulin
to remove the Apache License or if they needed to reach out to the original contributor to re-license the code.  I believe they have that authority with or without the contributor's permission. - Bob On 6/15/2020 7:39 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > >> * If there’s no any dif

Re: [DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

2020-06-15 Thread Bob Paulin
This was not my intent.  John states it more clearly in his reply that removal of the Numpy License requires additional steps. - Bob On 6/15/2020 3:05 AM, Chen, Ciyong wrote: > Hi Bob, Leonard, > > Thanks for the elaboration/guideline on the dual license issue. > May I have the co

Re: Revised OpenSAML proposal

2003-01-29 Thread RL &#x27;Bob' Morgan
up this claim, and they still haven't had enough interest to come up with procedures for getting licenses (and why would they, since they're free), would lead one to believe that they aren't going to pursue enforcing any rights here very aggressively. As Scott s

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

2020-06-24 Thread Bob Paulin (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17144588#comment-17144588 ] Bob Paulin commented on INCUBATOR-253: -- Based on some of the replies here t