Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > However, we do have a chance here to host the governance and spec > process for JINI. > > Therefore, I'd like to propose that we create two podlings, one for JINI > governance, and one for building the implementation and community around > the working code that has been proposed.
I'm extremely reluctant to start out with two podlings. I'm not sure what "governance" you have in mind beyond the spec process, but I don't believe we have sufficient commitments from people to keep an equivalent of the existing Jini community standards process going forward. I think our best shot at success is a single podling, which maintains both specs and code under a single development process. (And as such, the specs would no longer be "standards".) - Bob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
