Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

Looks good to me. +1 to release. Niall On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Hello, > This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. This is our > third try for our first release. We have resolved all the issues that > have been discussed in our previous tries.

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

I see from the discussion threads that you decided to remove people who had never been active - but were the following people omitted from the resolution by mistake or on purpose? Ali Anil Sinaci (70 commits, last in May & voted on graduation & resolution): http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=fr

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby >is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further > >RESOLVED, that all responsibil

Fwd:

http://www.ackairos.it/wmc5lt.php?s=lf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > >>> >>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times, >>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy >>> community, but that is not a

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator > should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an > existing TLP. The Incubator *creates* Apache-style communities. But... Stop. > > For these, we

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > > >wrote: >> > >> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" task

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Apache Onami

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > maybe my e-mail has not been seen. Any comments from the IPMC? If not, > I will discuss the next steps with the Onami devs. My first thought was "Is this too quick?" - but looking are the origins and whos involved - then I t

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a good vote email. +1 from me. Niall On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made > significant progress with the project since moving over to Apach

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

+1 Niall On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > = Ivory Proposal = > > == Abstract == > Ivory is a data processing and management solution for Hadoop designed for > data motion, coordination of data pipelines, lifecycle management, and > data discovery. Ivory enables end

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

+1 to Falcon - or whatever name it finalises on! Niall On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon > (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache > Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let t

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Onami as TLD

+1 Niall On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then > the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy. > > A few releases were made and the status page has been completed: > http://incub

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> One alternative to going for full-on majority voting is to recognize that a >> larger group is much more likely to have "noisy vetoes" by requiring that >> successful votes have n po

Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus)

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Ross, > > > > -Original Message- > From: Ross Gardler > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:20 PM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Subject: R

Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus)

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Niall, > > First off, thanks for reading my proposal! > > Specific comments below: > > -Original Message- > > From: Niall Pemberton > Reply-To: &q

Re: [VOTE] Accept Olingo proposal as an incubating project

+1 Niall On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator. > > The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email. > The corresponding wiki page is: http://wiki.apache.org/** > incubator/OlingoPropos

Re: Apache River

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > FYI, > Apache River has just started a podling graduation vote. > > FTR, All 3 mentors have expressed support of graduation previously. Presumably the "copyright" and "Verify distribution rights" tasks are completed - if so can you get them

Re: [OTQ] Apache License File

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:58 AM, James Kosin wrote: > Everyone, > > I know I may be opening a can of worms here in even mentioning this, but > here it goes... > > Is there any reason why the license file is only available as .text or > .html, styled as an Apache page? > > I've seen various sites h

Re: Voting waiting period

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: >> On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: >> > Bertrand, >> > >> > I agree.  The good thing about a vibrant community is that they >> > generally enforce this.  All I'm saying is thi

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of the Chemistry Podling

+1 Niall On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the > last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now its > first sucessful non-Java release too. The community is healthy and di

Re: Voting waiting period

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/12/2011 10:57 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf >> wrote: >>> Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: >>>> On 2/5/11 4:16 PM,

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote: > >> Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >>> Hmmm, >>> >>> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of >>> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > >> >> "dist" is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download >> they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people >> downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific >> artifact

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Niall, > >>> [...] >>> Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the "deep archive". >>> Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data. >>> >> >> Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hama 0.2.0-incubating release

Has the Hama community voted to release this? I only found one vote thread for this and no-one voted: http://hama.markmail.org/message/uoyxutqy5nbtpd7j Niall On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi all, > > I just uploaded a release candidate for Apache Hama release 0.2.0. Th

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache NPanday 1.3-incubating Released

I didn't recall a release vote on this list and searching the NPanday list I see the following which confirms that: http://markmail.org/message/exvh6mjwqi6kpcjp Releases require the Incubator PMC approval - not just your mentor's votes and for that you should have held a vote on this list. This r

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Luke Kowalski wrote: > The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate. The "Required Resources" section of the proposal is pretty minimalistic listing only two mailing lists, JIRA, Subversion & download site. While it is not necessary IMO to detai

Re: Build machines: external or colocated?

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Most of Apache Infrastructure is based on shared resources, and our build > environments are no exception.   We currently provide both jenkins and > buildbot > based build systems, and the slaves naturally run jobs for several projects. > > We

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > I have tried to follow as much as emails as possible but it's > overwhelming. Anyway I feel that several questions do not longer > belong to the pre-incubation phase but should be clarified after we > have accepted the podlin

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:44 PM, wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 02:21:01 > PM: > >> >> This proposal raises lots of questions, but the requirements for >> entering the incubator are not high and so IMO don't need to be >> answered before

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Niall Pemberton >>  wrote: >> >>> IMO the only negative thing then about LibreOffice is the copyleft >>> licens

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 6/5/11 11:21 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have tried to follow as much as emails as possible but it'

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 06:30:06 > PM: > >> >> I agree with you - in this case I think it would be better if IBM >> collaborated with LibreOffice, rather than seeking to compete. But I >> could be wrong. >

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:04 AM, wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 06:45:16 > PM: > >> > I'll lend a voice to the contrary. >> > >> > I can't see why splitting a community should be a factor in entry to > the >> > incubator. J

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall >> wrote: >>> On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > >> >> It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to >> LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to >> LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't >> I

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:48 AM, wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 07:02:02 > PM: > >> > >> > Otherwise this is like the Baptists telling the Methodists that they >> > cannot have a church of their own in town, because the Baptists want > to &

Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested > mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. > > This is what I entered into the wiki: > > The following mailing lists: > > oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for

Re: A lot of bodies, a lot of money, and a source-dump release.

I have concerns about the proposal, but not with the ones you raise. If you're right about the costs, they not going to hit from day one - as the initial effort will be in building the community and building something that can be released and very little needed in terms of end users - and the ASF

Re: A little OOo history

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/7/2011 10:23 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: >> >> One question about the comment above though:  Are you advocating that Apache >> OOo stick to source-only releases, and avoid >> building and delivering binaries altogether?  Or is your id

Re: OpenOffice: Arguments and facts. Going ahead

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: The only thing I really don't have read anything about is, if we can handle this project from infra-resourcing. >>> >>> Joe Schaefer added himself as a mentor, so we can consider that covered. > > I just have learned OOo delivers

Re: A little OOo history

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/7/2011 11:11 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. >> wrote: >>> >>> Just to clarify, only source code is "released" by the ASF.  Yes, there

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

+1 Niall On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > Hi all, > > Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread, > I'd like to call a vote. > > At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a > link to the document in the wiki:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sqoop for Incubation

+1 Niall On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote: > As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few > days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an > Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text > of the proposa

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

I vote -1 for the reasons I said here: http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo Niall On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] > > As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding > dow

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Sanselan

+1 Niall On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi, > > Sanselan has been in incubation since September 2007. Sanselan is a > pure-java image library for reading and writing a variety of image formats. > > Monthly and then quarterly reports can be found at > http://svn.apache.o

Re: REMINDER: July Board Reports

Sanselan has graduated to Apache Commons - is a report required? Niall On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Upayavira wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 12:43 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> Just a reminder.  Please get them done. > > According to Clutch, this is a "group 1" month, meaning that the > pro

Re: REMINDER: July Board Reports

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Upayavira wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:47 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> Sanselan has graduated to Apache Commons - is a report required? > > A report simply saying that would be ideal. I just checked - its already been done - sorry for th

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension

+1 Niall On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache > Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension > > The full proposal can be found at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal > > Vote will close

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:48 +0100, ant elder wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ross Gardler > wrote: >> >> > I would suggest that anyone wishing to vote -1 on the graduation of > a >> > podling on grounds of diversity of code comm

Re: Diversity as an insurance policy (Was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot)

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Aug 4, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bertrand >> Delacretaz wrote: >>> >>> In such a case, the key point is, do the people who write the code >>> listen to the community? >> >> That's

Re: Does an incubation proposal require a codebase?

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> ...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been >> wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a >> technical >> architecture pr

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote: >> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache >>  Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the >>  Incubator PMC for this release. >> >>  Cassandra is a massively sc

Re: Making up policy on the fly

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand > Delacretaz wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ted Leung wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Exactly.  The incubator enforces Best Practices even when

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ant elder wrote: >> Also, if we do the making best practices a graduation requirement >> instead of a release requirement that might alleviate the poor mentor >> issue as its easy enough to check the latest

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard >> practise. >>  > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > I will try to keep this short. > > The OSGi Service Platform is composed of the core and compendium specs. The > EEG specs are not in any way special and will ultimately end up as part of > the compendium spec. Apache Felix was incubated to

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc1

What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that (its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what I can see: http://incubator.markmail.org/message/wko4emwcwst5imto If you're going to release that code then you should include the source and IMO it would be

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

+1 Niall On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call > a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good > discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition > of initial commit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason. >> >> 1: From the get-go, this appears headed towards an umbrella project. >>   Too many ways to justify "yeah, this belongs h

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

+1 Niall On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: > Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is > defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. > > There

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

w-it-works.html#decision-making Niall > +1 Votes > - > * Kevan Miller (binding) > * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) > * Niall Pemberton (binding) > > > I will add distribution artifacts to the  incubator "dist/"  place

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

but you need to allow time to see if its possible. Niall > If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we > will try to be perfect :) > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > From: Niall Pemberton > To: general@incu

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and > Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of PDFBox 0.8.0-incubating

f so, what is it? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/pdfbox/tags/0.8.0-incubating/ Niall >>   [ ] +1 Approve the release of PDFBox 0.8.0-incubating >>   [ ] -1 Do not approve this release because... >> >>  The following three IPMC member votes were cast already on pd

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)

+1 Niall On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > > This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. > > OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the > JSR-299: Contexts and  Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform > which is defined as JSR

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene

Good "rationale for graduation" btw, would be nice if all graduations votes followed this style. Niall On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 AM, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > On behalf of Lucene.Net mentor, committers and community, this is a vote > call to graduate the Lucene.Net project > (ht

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.1

+1 from me, couple of minor comments: * Could you put the artefacts for each release in a separate directory next time, just to make it completely obvious whats being voted on. * The pom.xml shipped in the source distro is out of sync with the build.xml and doesn't work Niall On Tue, Oct 13, 200

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene

+1 Niall On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:33 AM, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > On behalf of Lucene.Net mentor, committers and community, this is a vote > call to graduate the Lucene.Net project > (http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/) as a sub-project under Apache > Lucene. > > > > The Lu

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

+1 Niall On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Click community has voted to request graduation from the > Incubator as a new TLP [1][2]. > > I would like to start a vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Click as > a Top Level Project to the Board. >

Re: JSecurity, Ki, Shiro project inconsistencies

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Is there anything I can do to help with this? I have updated the status page except for the following references which needs to be moved first: http://incubator.apache.org/ki/ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KI http:

Re: JSecurity, Ki, Shiro project inconsistencies

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> Hi Alan, >> >> Is there anything I can do to help with this? > > I have updated the status page except for the following references > which nee

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

I have a couple of questions: Could you be more specific about the problems faced by the Subversion Corporation in its three years of existence and the reasons for merging with the ASF? Do you anticipate whether any of these will cause issues/problems at the ASF? This *feels* like a much bigger p

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 09:27, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: >> Yes, *AND* ensuring legal dots are put on the i's and j's. This is >> done through checking the release and ensuring that it is in adherence >> to our policies which you and others have

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato >> wrote: >> >>> Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all.  The >>> Subversion community has never re

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > The Apache Incubator is about EDUCATION. It is about TEACHING podlings > how to work here at Apache. > > It is not about making podlings thoughtlessly follow checklists. > > It is about TEACHING them what are the important aspects of > developmen

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:21, Craig L Russell wrote: >> >> On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> But with all that said, how about we do this: we'll do a 1.6.7 release >>> from the 1.6.x branch after we do the code import. That r

Re: svn status update (was: svn commit: r880911 [1/13] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ build/ build/generator/ build/win32/ notes/obliterate/ packages/python-windows/ packages/windows-WiX/BuildSubversion

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+ > committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo. > Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over to the > ASF (we were already on ALv2, so

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

+1 Niall On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the > "Apache Pivot" top-level project. > > Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as > recommendations to the Board at the Decembe

Re: running RAT with excludes (Was: svn status update...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:01 PM, David Crossley wrote: > Branko ??ibej wrote: >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version)  on subversion trunk but theres alot >> > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header >&

Re: svn status update (was: svn commit: r880911 [1/13] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ build/ build/generator/ build/win32/ notes/obliterate/ packages/python-windows/ packages/windows-WiX/BuildSubversion

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require >> license headers in README files and such? > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/ >

Re: running RAT with excludes (Was: svn status update...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Crossley wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > Branko ??ibej wrote: >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot >> >

Re: svn status update (was: svn commit: r880911 [1/13] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ build/ build/generator/ build/win32/ notes/obliterate/ packages/python-windows/ packages/windows-WiX/BuildSubversion

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+ >>> committers have access and are beginning work wi

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

I ran a RAT report on the release and all looks good. Has the appropriate license/notice/disclaimer files. From what I can see only the project source is shipped, so although there are some dependencies that wouldn't be allowed under ASF policy, since they're not shipped with the release then this

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > There is only a "bz2" arch

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> >> >> >> Which is linked from the sidebar everywhere, and on the docs page: >> > > That trunk documentation is at least labelled "dev".  I'd argue it sh

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> It might be good a good idea to not confuse users trying to find docs >> that relate to a release from that of of the current trunk, but its >> doing incubating projects a disservi

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> What we publish on the ASF websites >> doesn't have to conform to the licensing policy that releases do. I would prefer what I say isn't distorted by selective editing. > I&

Re: How documentation != code, and how to "do" policy (was: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion)

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: >> >> So, subversion publishes their trunk API docs nightly, for the >> convenience of their own developers and the surrounding tool developer >> community. All those people mostly want trunk API docs, and they want >> them mo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ant elder wrote: > A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1] > > Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended > to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x > component as a new 2.0 codeb

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

+1 Niall 2009/12/11 Gurkan Erdogdu : > Hi; > > This is a reminder email that 72 hours have already passed. > > What other IPMC members think about graduation?  So far we have three > binding +1 votes from > > Kevan Miller, > Matthias Wessendorf, > Bertrand Delacretaz > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >> A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1] >> >> >> >> Does this really need to be i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

ation >> >> Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > - Original Message >> > >> >> From: ant elder >> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> >> Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for

Re: [PROPOSAL] OODT: a grid middleware framework for science data processing, information integration, and retrieval

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2010, at 5:48 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" > wrote: > > LOL @ you guys. I will require one of the Sean's to go by an alias, perhaps > Panther, or Puma. Or McLovin' > > Cheers, > Chris > > Technically you should hold a vote on

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal

Is one mentor/champion enough? Niall On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and > call a vote. > > I'd like to propose incubation for a new  project called the Spatial > Information Systems (SIS). I think we ha

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal

+1 Niall On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and > call a vote. > > I'd like to propose incubation for a new  project called the Spatial > Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the > necessary bits

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

enerate JSON output >    * Tests >          o JUnit >          o Log4J > > Required Resources > >    * Mailing lists >          o validation-private (with moderated subscriptions) >          o validation-dev >          o validation-user >          o validation-com

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > impleme

Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote: >> It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a >> branch, and the live site off trunk, or vice versa. >> >> (possible, but I wouldn't recommend it, merging html

  1   2   3   >