Congratulations, Jukka! You've done a fantastic job!
Karl
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Finally, if elected (and assuming the IPMC still exists), I'd serve
>> for at most two years before calling for a
Answering on Grant's behalf, the ManifoldCF artifact contains both
source and binary, and the KEYS and CHANGES.txt files are within the
artifact, as seems to be standard Apache practice. You just need to
untar/unzip it.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi
rote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Answering on Grant's behalf, the ManifoldCF artifact contains both
>> source and binary, and the KEYS and CHANGES.txt files are within the
>> artifact, as seems to be standard Apache practi
The download size of sources alone is about 32M for each .zip/.tar.gz.
I can't upload CHANGES.txt or KEYS to people.apache.org right now
because of a firewall restriction, so I've attached the files for your
convenience.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> The key should also be added to a pgp key server.
>
The key has already been added to the MIT web of trust - I presume
that is what you meant?
>
> AIUI there must be a source distribution; the binary distribution is optional.
>
> The consumer should not be forced to download the binary distrib
>> Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
>
> That's not what I said.
>
> You can have a binary distribution if you wish, but there must be a
> source distribution.
>
As I said before, it makes no sense to distribute ManifoldCF binaries
without complete sources. So we could (I s
>
> Also, the NOTICE and LICENSE files don't seem to be quite right.
>
> The NOTICE file is for required notices only; so for example there is
> no need to mention other ASF projects.
>
> The LICENSE file references JUnit, which does not need to be
> distributed, so is not needed in the LICENSE.
>
>
> The md5 hash file has an odd syntax, which makes it harder to use with
> automated checking tools.
>
> apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubator.zip: A3 3E 0A 9F 58 94 DC 64 F7 B3 ED DB 63
> 2E
> CB EF
>
> The standard format is
>
> a33e0a9f5894dc64f7b3eddb632ecbef *
gt; On 6 January 2011 18:23, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>> Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
>>>
>>> That's not what I said.
>>>
>>> You can have a binary distribution if you wish, but there must be a
>>> source dis
> It's unacceptable to not release software according to Apache guidelines.
> There's some flexibility in those guidelines (whether to include a binary
> release or not, whether to include jar files in a distro or use Maven, etc.),
> and then there's not (must include a source release; must have
Since this is a release candidate, and the release has not yet been
signed off, the tag has not yet been created. There is, however, a
release branch, from which the release candidates get built. When the
sign off occurs, the tag will be created from that branch.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:
The official name of the project has changed repeatedly. The current
official name is "ManifoldCF". The community expects to change both
the SVN root and the web-site root upon incubation in any case, which
is why we have not changed either of these yet. A bigger area of
concern is the prefix us
ted. Your proposal
sounds perfectly reasonable, though - I can begin to do it that way on
the next RC (which will actually be RC4).
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 20:06, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Since this is a release candidate, and the release has not
The failure to build occurs because the directory it is complaining
about doesn't seem to exist after the zip is unpacked. The directory
is empty at the time of the build. It's not clear whether the problem
is the built zip itself or the way you are unpacking it. I'll need to
look into this more
We've been using the RAT tool. The files without headers are in part
Microsoft project files, which cannot have headers added without
breaking them. Also, we build JSON sources, which are licensed with
an accepted JSON license that RAT does not recognize.
I've captured a lot of these exceptions
hould do with those, which is why I
left them as is. What is your recommendation?
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 22:38, Karl Wright wrote:
>> We've been using the RAT tool.
>
> In which case it would be helpful to provide the RAT
were not on it, however, although it seems very clear
that these *should* have apache headers on them.
I'm happy to just go ahead and do that, unless you think it would be a mistake.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 23:53, Karl Wright wrote:
>>
the Lucene skin, which I believe
could simply be removed.
Thoughts?
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> They were downloaded from the jakarta standard taglibs 1.1.2, from this URL:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_taglibs-standard.cgi
>
&g
oldCF setup.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:22 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>> Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
>>
>> One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to
>> build the documentation p
>> Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM
>> Karl Wright wrote:
>> > The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest
>> 0.9-dev. If
>> > there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev
>> available, I'd be
>> > willing to consider requirin
I have uploaded a new artifact now.
I could call this a release candidate except for the following:
- This artifact has not been voted on by the ManifoldCF community. It
is probably necessary to revote since what is included in the package
has changed (e.g. no build artifacts except for docs).
-
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 20:29, Karl Wright wrote:
>> The official name of the project has changed repeatedly. The current
>> official name is "ManifoldCF". The community expects to change both
>> the SVN root and the web-s
The community wanted to include both a source and a source+binary
distribution. Accordingly, I spun up one of those, which is RC5. The
RC4 candidate is still up there, so I guess you can vote on either
one.
Thanks!
Karl
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Karl
>
> I don't understand why ManifoldCF needs this special "skin" processing
> that then needs to live in your svn.
> At Forrest, we advise not to create their own skin unless absolutely
> necessary. We prefer to address any needs in the default skin.
>
> With a quick flick through the ManifoldCF sit
x27;s in the NOTICE file in expanded form. If you think I should
move the preamble to the LICENSE file as well, this would be the time
to indicate that. Otherwise, the preamble will just be deleted.
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Kar
of the them not Derivative Works so nothing is
> needed in your NOTICE file.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Rather than spin a whole new RC and upload it, which takes me two
>> hours, I've attached the revised proposed NOTIC
F code)
> So for any products that *require* a notice, the following should be enough:
>
> ===
> This product contains MegaCorp FOO
> Copyright (c) 1995-2000 by the MegaCorp Universal Corporation
> ===
>
> The full details go in the LICENSE file.
>
> On
, at least I'm being consistent. There is NO
license information in NOTICE.txt, as it stands now.
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I've made the 2011 change already. But I'm having trouble reconciling
> your instructions with this part of the Ap
11, at 7:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I've made the 2011 change already. But I'm having trouble reconciling
>> your instructions with this part of the Apache license:
>>
>>>>>>>>
>> (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" tex
ads how many +1s were attained, etc.,
> without having to do a lot of detective work.
>
> Thanks for working the process. Trust me: it gets easier :)
>
> Once the above is done, I don't foresee any objections from me!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:40
TE] thread, like this:
>>
>> [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 RC #N
>>
>> That way it's clear in mailing list threads how many +1s were attained,
>> etc., without having to do a lot of detective work.
>>
>> Thanks for working the process. Trust
t, I don't think there is any point in further changes.
Thanks,
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 January 2011 16:40, Karl Wright wrote:
>> I've attached a new proposed version of README.txt, NOTICE.TXT, and
>> LICENSE.txt. Any further comments?
>
&g
> I still think the binary archive is unnecessarily bloated, and will
> cause wasted load and resources for mirrors and consumers.
>
If it were straightforward, I would already have done it.
Here's a rundown of the space usage in the dist directory of the -bin object:
doc:
995 File(
> Not sure what you mean by "open" copy.
>
"Open" meaning not bound up in a war.
> There are also 2 copies of each of the war files, total 37M for one set.
>
Yes, that's known to me; so you are also suggesting that not just the
dependent jars be treated this way, but all the built artifacts as
w
Please point me at a URL where it says this is Apache policy. I know
of several Apache projects which work the same way ManifoldCF does.
svn is perfectly capable of storing binary images of all kinds.
Karl
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> I've just noticed that there are lots of j
We would like to eventually get them out of there, but both Grant and
I agreed early on that it wasn't the highest priority. If it is
Apache policy, then obviously we'd have to change our minds.
When we attack this, we intend to use ant plus ivy, not Maven. We
tried Maven and found it was diffic
I have a number of questions about this change.
First, ManifoldCF only uses the confluence wiki for the following uses:
- Where content has been contributed by non-Apache persons directly
- Where content has been contributed without an explicit Apache license grant
This begs the following questi
Calling the official vote for release of ManifoldCF 0.1 incubating,
RC8, which can be found at http://people.apache.org/~kwright . The
community has voted for release of the new RC, so we're ready to go
ahead with an incubator vote on the same.
Thanks in advance!
Karl
---
Oh, forgot to mention that the release candidate tag is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8/
Karl
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Calling the official vote for release of ManifoldCF 0.1 incubating,
> RC8, which can be fo
ache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating-src.zip
> [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann%
>
> Thanks for including CHANGES.txt and KEYS. That really helped.
>
> Great job and great working the process!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 9
4:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Thanks for the votes! Still need one more binding +1...
>> Karl
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>
It looks like we're going to go ahead and release.
I'll post a [RESULT][VOTE] message when that is certain.
Karl
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> About 5 hours after ant voted, a user discovered that a problem we'd
> thought was fixed in RC8 is still in
There were three binding +1's, and nothing else. Release passes!
Karl
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> It looks like we're going to go ahead and release.
> I'll post a [RESULT][VOTE] message when that is certain.
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Jan 31
tween the previous RC and a current one
> would show that nothing (legally) material has changed and thereby lead
> to an easy +1 vote, from someone who has voted previously.
>
> Upayavira, who accepts that by replying like this he is saying he'll
> attempt to review the next RC
&g
ManifoldCF 0.1-incubating has been released.
In a short while the mirrors should all have the release available for
download. The site has also been updated, and that will be
replicating within 24 hours also.
After this time tomorrow, please visit the download page
(http://incubator.apache.org/c
Hi folks,
About 3 weeks ago I cc'd the results of the ManifoldCF PPMC vote on
Erlend to priv...@incubator.apache.org, as per the instructions, but
he still has not received any communication about an Apache account
and is thus blocked from doing committer related activities. Is there
some process
Vote has passed the PPMC for this release candidate.
The RC2 of the ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating release is now up on
http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2.
Please vote!
Thanks,
Karl
Hi again,
Just to be clear, the ManifoldCF podling needs incubator consideration
of the release candidate in order to do the release, and three binding
+1 votes. Any chance that this might happen?
Karl
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote has passed the PPMC for t
Grant Ingersoll granted his +1 to the release. There were 4 binding
PPMC +1's in all.
Karl
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Just to be clear, the ManifoldCF podling needs incubator considera
arvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Just to be clear, the ManifoldCF podling needs incubator consideration
>> of the release candidate in order to do the release, and three binding
>> +1 votes. Any chance that this might ha
----
>> From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 7:04 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Erlend Garåsen
>> Subject: Erlend Garåsen, voted to be a committer for ManifoldCF, still
> waiting
>> for an Apache account
>>
>
ManifoldCF, since this is probably limiting our
chances of graduation at this point. Does this ever happen (that
anyone is aware of)?
Karl
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> We've still received zero binding
e list.
Thanks!
Karl
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 05:19 -0400, "Karl Wright"
> wrote:
>> We effectively have only one active mentor. There were others, of
>> course, when the project entered incubation, but they hav
has rather unique requirements as far as testing
infrastructure is concerned, which could arguably lead to other
spinoff Apache projects someday.
Please contact me if you're interested!
Karl
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Thanks for the information. I can offer on
Vote: Three +1's, no -1's.
Vote passes.
Karl
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote has passed the PPMC for this release candidate.
>
> The RC2 of the ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating release is now up on
> http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The
Thanks to all that voted!
Karl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
The ManifoldCF project just lost Grant Ingersoll as a mentor, who
resigned last Tuesday. ManifoldCF has been incubating since January
2010 and basically provides a framework and connectors for
synchronizing content from a set of repositories to a set of target
search engines, with security.
Hi all,
The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be
from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I
was told a while back that
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache
>> Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include
>> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to b
onger necessary? If so, what caveats do I
need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy
whatever Chemistry does?
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Mani
Thanks - that's sufficient as far as I am concerned. ;-)
Karl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs,
> which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the
> original ones, but I wou
The ManifoldCF community has voted to release ManifoldCF
0.3-incubating RC1. Now it is your turn to vote! You can pick up the
artifact at http://people.apache.org/~kwright, or if you want to look
at the svn tag it's at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.3-incubating-RC1
+1 from me, of course, also (non-binding)
Karl
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> Il giorno 13/set/2011, alle ore 19:33, Karl Wright ha
> scritto:
>
>> The ManifoldCF community has voted to release Manifold
13, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> The ManifoldCF community has voted to release ManifoldCF
>> 0.3-incubating RC1. Now it is your turn to vote! You can pick up the
>> artifact at http://people.apache.org/~kwright, or if you want to look
>> at the svn tag it&#x
Three binding +1's, >72 hours. Vote passes!
A big "thanks" to all that voted too... ;-)
Karl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks to all who put time and effort into this release!
The site and download mirrors should update in a day or so, but if you
cannot wait, you can download the release in the interim from
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/manifoldcf.
Karl
Hi folks,
I'm trying to get a membership count for the ManifoldCF member lists.
I'm a moderator for these, and at one point I was able to figure out
how to do it, but the reference that the "committers" page sends you
to ("the svn "committers" project, under /doc/resources.txt") doesn't
seem to ex
ManifoldCF submitted a report in September. I'm not sure why this was
not logged.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
>
> ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
> (also managed to
ManifoldCF is also listed as March, June, September, and December on
the referenced page.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Michael Fitzner
wrote:
> I think some projects are wrong scheduled for the „October 2011
> Incubator Board Report“ The current schedule plan
> http://wiki.apache.org/in
determining the strategy and the exact list of files for the software grant from MetaCarta, and I'd love to
get people's feedback as to what should be included, and how. What list would be appropriate for that? Should we set one up?
Thanks again,
Karl Wright
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi All,
(P
FWIW, helium is the output product of a sun-like star, not the fuel. That
would be hydrogen.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
> the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On
Perhaps some clarification is in order, explaining where we are and how we
got here, and the procedures the podling followed to come up with the
current proposal. I especially want to address the concern that we've been
ignoring the advice of the incubator.
Here is a short history, for those unfa
perly vette
Apache Manifold as the next step.
http://www.manifold.net/index.shtml
Karl
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:57 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > Grant proposed that we simply go from LCF to ACF at that time, and
> > posted ac
Not only did we ask, we've asked more than once.
We're going that extra mile to call a vote to resolve this issue
specifically because there seems to be a wide range of opinion as to whether
the name is acceptable to the incubator, and by implication, the board.
It's quite clear that there's also
We obviously want the opinion, but I would claim we are looking for an
opinion less on aesthetics and more on whether or not the incubator or the
board would have technical objections to this name choice. Would this
choice prevent graduation, for instance (in which case a -1 is certainly
warranted
The only software ever granted to ASF by MetaCarta was the code for
ManifoldCF. It was not called ManifoldCF at that time, and was not
imported into svn with any "manifoldcf" strings anywhere. But look
for package names that include "com.metacarta.agents",
"com.metacarta.crawler", "com.metacarta.
To our mentors,
The September 2011 report was not signed off. Could one of you review
the current December report and sign off on it? Thanks!
Karl
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubato
Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at:
http://people.apache.org/~kwright.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hello incubator,
>
> We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
> system plugins with their own versioning and
Hello incubator,
We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's
the first one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released.
We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors).
Karl
-
Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at:
http://people.apache.org/~kwright.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hello incubator,
>
> We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
> system plugins with their own versioning and
Hello incubator,
We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's
the second one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released.
We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors).
Karl
Hello incubator,
We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's
the third one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released.
We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors).
Karl
-
Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at:
http://people.apache.org/~kwright.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hello incubator,
>
> We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target
> system plugins with their own versioning and
Any time a body of code is contributed from another source, it should
go through the standard Apache procedures, including a license grant
(if it's not open-source already). But this is very different from
spinning off chunks of an existing incubator project.
For example, ManifoldCF is currently
Hello Incubator IPMC,
Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating,
RC2. This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection.
You can find the artifact at
http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, or
in svn at
https://svn.apache.org/repo
I think Jukka meant to post this to general@i.a.o...
Karl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jukka Zitting
Date: Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
To: Karl Wright
Hi,
+1
BR,
Jukka Zitting
With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We need one more...
Karl
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
> 2012/1/4 Karl Wright
>
>> Hello Incubator IPMC,
>>
>> Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0
With Tommaso's and Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We still need one
more binding IPMC vote for this subpackage.
Karl
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/12/29 Karl Wright
>
>> Sorry - you can find t
We need one more binding IPMC vote for this sub-package. Any takers?
Karl
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/12/29 Karl Wright
>
>> Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at:
>> http://people.apache.org/
One more binding vote needed for this subpackage. Please somebody vote!
Karl
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/12/29 Karl Wright
>
>> Hello incubator,
>>
>> We've decided to release some of the ManifoldC
(We apologize; we really hate to bother you all, but
those ARE the rules...)
Respectfully,
Karl
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We need one more...
&g
gt; what we did for Lucy!
>
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Marvin Humphrey
>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:33 PM
>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
>>
>>On
Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:11:49PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Waiting for the last IPMC vote has become the longest and most
>> uncertain part of the ManifoldCF release process. Considering the
>> amount of effort a
t;from their podlings who would make good IPMC
>>members and nominate them privately, just as
>>podlings nominate members for their own PPMC.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> From: Karl Wright
>>>To: general@incubator.
My opinion: It's one thing to try to involve yourself in the fortunes
of one or two projects in addition to your own, and be willing to
provide general opinions, and be willing to contribute content to the
incubator's policy pages. But the incubator is so huge these days and
so diverse that just k
Apparently, I'm now a member of the IPMC.
+1 from me. ;-)
Karl
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> One more binding vote needed for this subpackage. Please somebody vote!
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
>> +
+1 from me (binding).
Karl
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> We need one more binding IPMC vote for this sub-package. Any takers?
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Tommaso
>>
>> 2
+1 from me (binding).
Karl
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> With Tommaso's and Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We still need one
> more binding IPMC vote for this subpackage.
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> w
+1 from me (binding).
Karl
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We need one more...
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Tommaso
>>
Three binding +1's, >72 hours, vote passes.
Karl
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Apparently, I'm now a member of the IPMC.
>
> +1 from me. ;-)
>
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> One more binding
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
