We obviously want the opinion, but I would claim we are looking for an opinion less on aesthetics and more on whether or not the incubator or the board would have technical objections to this name choice. Would this choice prevent graduation, for instance (in which case a -1 is certainly warranted).
Karl On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> > wrote: > > I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a > > slamdunk easy thing. If the podling wants to change their name, then > > fine. Sounds easy enough. I would see no reason for anybody outside > > the podling to -1 that choice, and might even say that I'd be upset if > > they did... > > Sure, the podling can change the name and it can be completely dealt > with an internal matter. However, in this case, the name change was > put up for a procedural/opinion vote on the incubator general list. As > such, I might be upset if people are criticized for giving "the wrong > vote". Most non-positive votes in the thread are non-binding so the > project can ignore them if they like, but if you don't want the > opinion, don't put it up for a vote. > > Kalle > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
