Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

We will encourage and monitor community >>> participation so that privileges can be extended to those that contribute. >>> >>> Optiq's pluggable architecture encourages developers to contribute >>> extensions such as adapters for data sources, new plannin

Spam

The dozen or so messages from abiola balogun on this list in the past month have been monosyllabic non sequiturs [1]. I think he/she/it is a spam bot and propose that he/she/it be removed from the list. Julian [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/maillist.html

Re: Spam

hey don't add a great deal of > value, I'm struggling to see the goal if they are (malicious) spam. > > I'm guessing we don't want to ban people for being misguided, or lack of > insight :) > > Tim > > On 21/06/14 00:37, Julian Hyde wrote: >> The

Wiki access

Could “julianhyde” please be granted write access to the Incubator wiki. Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Wiki access

I requested permission to access the incubator wiki last month, and it was granted, and I was able to edit https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014. However I am now unable to edit https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2014. It says “immutable page”. Can I have access to that page, please.

Re: Wiki access

I already tried logging out & in, and I also logging in from another browser. Can you please check whether “JulianHyde” has access. (Because http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinBugs/UserNamesShouldNotBeCaseSensitive.) Julian

Re: Wiki access

On Aug 1, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I've removed "julianhyde" and added "JulianHyde". Please try again. That did the trick. Thank you. Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating)

Hi all, The Optiq community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating). This would be the first release of the Apache Optiq project inside the Incubator. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and with the endorsement of two of our mentor

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating)

This vote passes with 6 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Alan Gates (mentor) +1 Jan Inversion +1 John D. Ament +1 Justin Mclean +1 Steven Noels (mentor) +1 Ashutosh Chauhan (champion) There was some feedback during voting (most of which I agree with). I shall open a separate thread to discuss. Thank

Issues raised during Optiq 0.9.0 release vote

A few issues were raised during the vote for Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating) [0]. I started a separate thread to avoid muddying the vote. I address them below. On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:36 AM, jan i wrote: > I am a bit concerned about the xml files. suppressions.xml references: > "-//Pupp

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating)

On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote: > On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> +1 Jan Inversion >> > I wonder who that is ? > > Politely said, I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled. Sorry; over-enthusia

Uploading a release

The release vote Optiq 0.9.0 passed over a week ago. I have the bits ready and staged [1] [2]. Now I have to publish the release. I’ve read http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#understanding-upload. I now “understand upload” in an abstract sense but am none the wiser. What

Re: Uploading a release

On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Publishing the contents at [1] can be done by following the steps detailed > out at > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution. > I read those steps, but was still confused. To this reader, https://dist.a

Re: Uploading a release

On Sep 4, 2014, at 2:05 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Well I think the ASF's implementation of subversion should be pretty > standard - if for no other reason than Subversion is an Apache > Project. :) I meant “implementation" in this sense: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_software_implementat

Re: Uploading a release

Taylor and Hitesh, Your instructions worked. It was very straightforward. Thank you. Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Podling name change - Optiq becomes Calcite

We have discovered that we are unlikely to be able to trademark "Apache Optiq", so we intend to change the name of the project to "Apache Calcite". The PPMC likes the name, and a trademark search reveals no competing uses of the name. What are the next steps? Can someone who has been through the s

Re: Podling name change - Optiq becomes Calcite

On Sep 26, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > we just renamed fleece to johnzon so maybe i can help: > > - Check for the new name: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html > - We voted on the dev list for the new name Still consensus building but will move to PPMC and dev votes in

[VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

Hi all, The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating). This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the new project name, Calcite. Pursuant to the Releases section of the I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/jhyde.asc Julian On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 October 2014 20:51, Julian Hyde wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Calcite community has voted on and approved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:41 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 October 2014 21:14, Julian Hyde wrote: >> That information is all in the vote proposal: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-optiq-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAMCtmeL%2Bgcf1yamWqRicpUJxU2tkyqGEzojd9nNXKmdEE3QwQQ%40ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

OK, let me clarify as sebb has asked so that the vote can proceed. The git commit to be voted upon: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-optiq/commit/6801257324d7515f91c61877a0edd0863c0433f5 Its hash is 6801257324d7515f91c61877a0edd0863c0433f5. The artifacts to be voted on are locate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +0 (binding) Will change to +1 once PPMC vote is clarified. > > I checked: > - vote may need another +1 (see below) > - hashes and signatures correct > - artefacts have incubating in name > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

nd LICENSE and they are in > order for a pure apache source release that embeds no externally licensed > code. These would have to be different in a binary release, of course, if > convenience jars are included, but there is no binary release at this time > so that is not yet an issue. &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently include a binary tar ball, only a source tar ball and maven jars. Ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

he standard key-servers, nor has it been signed by anyone. I found it here: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=Julian+Hyde&op=index Even if the key is part of a web trust it may not be part of everyone's web of trust. I'd see that as a hard

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

rts used and requested for signed e-mail >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] >> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 22:29 >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

This vote passes with 3 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Alan Gates (mentor) +1 Justin Mclean +1 Steven Noels (mentor) Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors, as soon as the necessary sub-tasks of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8413 have been completed. Julian

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Gaurav Gupta wrote: > > +1 (Non-binding) > > -Gaurav > >> On Aug 13, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Pramod Immaneni wrote: >> >> +1 (Non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >>> Following the discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

t; >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-calcite-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD%3DPUH70eyPY3u25O4ayimwOXfBBxiX2txUEcNbUCYODXg%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> To remove the ambiguity: three IPMC members have voted +1: Ashutosh >> Chauhan, Julian Hyde, and Alan Gates. >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 Julian > On Sep 1, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Following the discussion earlier: >> http://s.apache.org/Gaf >> >> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HAWQ >> as a new incubator project. >> >> The prop

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

> On Aug 29, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > LICENSE has some issues that need to be corrected: > - missing MIT license for ./site/_sass/_font-awesome.scss > - missing MIT license for ./site/_sass/_normalize.scs > - missing MIT license for /site/_sass/_gridism.scss > - missing MIT licens

Calcite graduation review

The Calcite project is considering graduation. A discussion on the dev list[1] is reaching consensus, and we will shortly start a vote on the dev list. It would be helpful if someone from the Incubator PMC could review. Could a shepherd who is not previously familiar with the project please revi

Re: Calcite graduation review

make sure that the projects status page is updated, seeing > new committers added and releases cut but these have not made it to the > projects status page. Thanks > > -Jake > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> The Calcite project is considering grad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-1.0-incubating

Forwarding my vote from dev@kylin: +1 (binding) Julian > On Sep 2, 2015, at 9:26 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > - Henry > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Luke Han wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release >> Apac

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Sep 2015 ([ppmc])

FWIW, Exactly the same thing happened to Calcite. Missed July, reported in August, was asked to report in September. Rather than quibbling, I filed a report. (With luck we’ll be graduated before December.) > On Sep 2, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:59 PM,

Calcite graduation vote

Pursuant to the graduation policy[1] it is my pleasure to inform the IPMC that the Calcite community has completed a discussion on graduation[2] and has commenced a vote[3]. Julian [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[DISCUSS] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incbuator

resolution. Julian Hyde, on behalf of Calcite PPMC [1] http://s.apache.org/ZPC [2] http://s.apache.org/rvB [3] http://s.apache.org/sv [4] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/calcite.html [5] http://s.apache.org/itP - - - snip - - - WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incbuator

I’m hearing positive noises, so I will start a formal vote. Julian > On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 9/12/15, 3:09 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > >> The Calcite community h

[VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

the Board. Please vote: [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Calcite as a top-level project [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not graduate Apache Calcite because… Here is my vote: +1 (binding) Voting will last 72 hours, ending at 19:00 Pacific on September 17th. Julian Hyde, on behalf of Calcite PPMC [1] http://s.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

* Andrew Purtell * Chris Nauroth * Henry Saputra * Hitesh Shah * John D. Ament * Julian Hyde * Owen O'Malley * P. Taylor Goetz * Sean Busbey * Seetharam Venkatesh * Stack * Steven Noels * Ted Dunning 8 non-binding: * Amol Kekre * Balaji Ganesan * Ian Dunlop * Jacques Nadeau * Jiang Xu * Li

Re: Podling Shark Tank at ApacheCON CORE on Thu 1sth of Oct @13:30

For what it's worth (since we're in Europe and we believe in recognizing the progeny of our IP), the US program "Shark Tank" is derived from a British programme "Dragons' Den", which was derived from a Japanese show "Money Tigers". Julian On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

It seems to me that the negatives of your proposed policy outweigh the positives. Presumably the goal is to prevent mentors from making biased decisions due to conflicts of interest. There are other approaches to solving CoI, such as declaring conflicts of interest and, Apache’s current approac

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Kylin from the Apache Incubator

D, that the Apache Kylin Project be and hereby is >>>>responsible for the creation and maintenance of open-source >>>>software related to distributed and scalable OLAP engine; >>>>and be it further >>>> >>>>RESOLVED,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Concerted into the Apache Incubator

ache projects in their use cases and accelerate their >> > performance while soliciting their support in development of the project. >> > We will not be using Apache brand for excessive branding or with any >> > commercial aspects of Concerted. Apache brand will

Re: [VOTE] Accept Concerted into the Apache Incubator

reat performance ( I have > written an application using it and it is on production systems for many > years). I think we can still provide a high performance API to the C++ core > and that is something I am personally working on right now. > On 10 Oct 2015 02:31, "Julian Hyde" wrote: &

Re: Require projects to have solid API docs

Per [1], "Apache projects should provide sufficient documentation [… so that … ] users can both make use of our software freely”. And: "users of Apache software should be able to find our software, learn how to use it, and actually apply it to all its common use cases solely by going to the Apa

Re: Require projects to have solid API docs

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Should != Must Yes, I know. But I didn't want to have everyone leap into yet another long-winded debate with no one even having mentioned that there is existing policy on this matter. Julian --

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

It's not activity on the dev list, or even report signoffs, that matter most. Podlings, especially new podlings, have lots and lots of questions, especially about infrastructure. Without at least two responsive mentors to field those questions you feel like banging your head on the wall. And you st

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

scalable OLAP engine; >> and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Kylin" be and >> hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at >> the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) > On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote: > > +1 > mvn test passed > > hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： > >> +1 >> >> unit test passed on my CI >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Checksum is corr

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

diverse >>>>> meritocratic community. Eagle intends to make every possible effort to >>>>> build a diverse, vibrant and involved community and has already received >>>>> substantial interest from various organizations. >>>>> >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

apache git library. >> >> External Dependencies >> Eagle has the following external dependencies. >> Basic >> •JDK 1.7+ >> •Scala 2.10.4 >> •Apache Maven >> •JUnit >> •Log4j >> •Slf4j >> •Apache Commons >> •Apache Commons Mat

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Oct 28, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh > wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:39 AM Till Westmann wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 27 Oct 2015, at 21:52, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >>> After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Looked over the mailing lists, JIRA, releases. Project seems to be ticking over nicely. Good luck! Julian > On Oct 28, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > +1 (binding, reiterating my earlier vote on dev@groovy) > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM, Konstantin Boudnik

Re: New Podling Website

+1 to jekyll also. I’m a git fanboy but in my opinion, for the purposes of publishing web sites svnpubsub is superior to gitpubsub. Why? Websites contain a lot of generated code such as javadoc, and I don’t want that living in my git repo (and everyone else’s copy of it) forever. I recommend ke

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

I’d like to clarify one thing. I believe that the licensing issue [1] was fixed in release 1.1-incubating. Issues were raised during the 1.1 release vote, and the vote may have had some procedural problems, and release 1.0 had the aforementioned problem, but release 1.1 is sound. Julian [1] h

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

I stand corrected. I now agree that kylin-1.1-incubating has a licensing issue. I must say, it did not help that KYLIN-999 was marked "fixed in 1.1" and the innocuous-looking KYLIN-1095 opened in its place. I think Kylin needs to have a clean release, with no licensing issues, before graduation.

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: > To > keep things simple, the new release will continue mark as v1.1 since > there's no much code changes. The release will have a significant difference in content. Giving a distinct release an identical release number will not simplify things! I

Re: Project Website Template

+1 I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m sure it will be helpful to new projects. We should make it clear that it is optional, of course. But when Calcite entered the incubator there were ent

Re: Project Website Template

> On Nov 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I also think it would be useful to provide a template for maven/java based >> projects. There would be a pom.xml, module/pom.xml and >> module/org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1.1 (incubating)

Forwarding my vote from dev@: +1 binding Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Project Website Template

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > The strawman of the template is available in the newly created git > repository > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/apache-website-template.git And mirrored at https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 > On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like >> to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal >> is pasted

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Nov 26, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome of > the CTR/RTC exchange in the project. > > Hence changing my vote to > -1 [binding] > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:47AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrot

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Greg, May I suggest a compromise? Enter incubation with no explicit commit policy and let the community choose a commit policy if and when they see fit. Julian > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec

Re: Impala commit policy

“No explicit commit policy” means that only committers can commit. It is each committer’s discretion whether they ask for others to review the change before they commit it, whether they check in code that doesn’t build, whether they run the test suite before committing. This policy is the bare

Re: Impala commit policy

at 6:42 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> “No explicit commit policy” means that only committers can commit. >> It is each committer’s discretion whether they ask for others to review >> the change before they commit it,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

I am the mentor of two new projects - Eagle and Concerted. It seems that neither has filed a report yet. Concerted received a reminder and has a template report generated in https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015 ; Eagle did not receive a

Re: December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > I am seeing Eagle is in group 2: http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt And I see that it was you who put it in group 2, in r1711145 to podlings.xml. :) But think they should be monthly at this point. December will be their first repo

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

I’ve been making some changes to the template and submitting them as github pull requests. (I made 5 pull requests a couple of weeks ago, which weren’t noticed, and Luciano subsequently made very some similar changes. Frustrating.) I don’t want to clutter this list with dev traffic, but there’s

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

sues. > > Thanks. > > On Friday, December 4, 2015, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I’ve been making some changes to the template and submitting them as >> github pull requests. (I made 5 pull requests a couple of weeks ago, which >> weren’t noticed, and Luciano subsequent

Re: December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

gt; Thanks Julian for catching the error. > > - Henry > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >>> I am seeing Eagle is in group 2: >>> http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups

Re: DRAFT report December 2015 -- please review

Marvin, Thanks for this. I don’t recall whether your preview “DRAFT report … please review” messages have contained detailed commentary. As someone who writes reports and also signs off podlings’ reports in the mentor role, it is very helpful to hear what you consider to be useful content. Jul

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

After Marvin's message I was curious enough to look up the policy. It is documented, and it is indeed as Marvin says: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html#pmcer I would encourage people to post links when responding to policy questions. It is not necessary, but it helps counter t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating

> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> On 5 Jan 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >> See http://compliance.rocks/result.html?1152a2a9 for a list of minor >> nits (missing some license headers in a bunch of python scripts). >> > nice script +1 > I think some other proj

Re: Concerted may be in need of help

(Removing dev@concerted from the To: list.) Good grief. No one is suggesting there should be "steady activity requirement". I and other Concerted mentors just have a hunch that the project isn't doing well, and thought it would be better to bring our concerns to this list earlier rather than later

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this >> thread went unnoticed. >> >> Cheers, >> Hadrian >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Mayank > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < > venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM Ted Dunning >> w

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

I can see how a TLP would not be receptive to someone nit-picking their LICENSE/NOTICE files. Asking for patches, as Marvin suggests, is one approach that might work. Another approach is for someone with expertise in licensing to approach a TLP and offer to take them through a licensing review.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 26, 2016, at 10:36 AM, James Taylor wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Regards, >> Arvind >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden >> wrote: >> >>> The Quarks proposal has been discussed

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Mar 4, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Alan. > >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 17:29, Poorna Chandra wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is >> available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraP

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends. While Calcite was in incubation no one (including the champion) had a clue what the role of t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

[License: MIT] >> * gflags: https://github.com/gflags/gflags [License: BSD] >> * glog: https://github.com/google/glog [License: BSD] >> * gperftools: https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools [License: BSD] >> * linenoise: https://github.com/antirez/linenoise [License: BSD 2-Claus

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -Flavio > >> On 23 Mar 2016, at 22:42, James Taylor wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Chris Nauroth >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> --Chris Nauroth >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Mar 28, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > ​ > > >>> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. >>> The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator >>> [ ] +0 Abstain >>> [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

Forwarding my vote from dev: +1 (binding) Julian > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal to > release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)". > The voting result is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

A reminder about whose votes are binding during this vote. Since this is a vote of the Incubator PMC (IPMC), your vote is only binding if you are an IPMC member. To find out, look up your username using phonebook: http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jhyde

Re: [LAZY] Simplify Champion role

+1 > On Mar 31, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Marvin Humphrey wrote on 3/31/16 10:44 AM: >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> >>> As for the patch I suggest a slightly expanded definition of Champion, >>> "A Member of the Apache Software Foundation

Re: Concerted may be in need of help

r to offer than "give up" then >>> please >>> refrain from offering your advice to mentors asking for constructive >>> help. >>> >>> That is not to say projects should linger, but unless mentors advise it >>> we >>> should not

Re: Concerted may be in need of help

Ok, I’ve started a DISCUSS thread. > On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> I agree. I think this project has been dead for a while, and we’re just >> prolonging the agony. > > As an initial

[DISCUSS] Retirement of Concerted

Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is an IPMC vote for retirement. Are there any objections or comments? If not, I shall start a vote shortly. Julian [1] http://mail-archives.apache.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion and Mentor. I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves only as Champion would I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after incubation starts. To use the “it takes a village” metaphor,

[VOTE] Retire Concerted

Incubator [ ] -1 to keep Concerted in the Incubator This vote will be held open for at least 72 hours. Here is my vote: [x] +1 retire Concerted Julian Hyde [1] https://s.apache.org/concerted-retire-discuss [2] https://s.apache.org/concerted-retire-vote [3] http://incubator.apache.org/guides

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Concerted

With 8 +1 votes, the motion to retire Concerted is passed. +1 John D. Ament +1 Roman Shaposhnik +1 Chris Nauroth +1 P. Taylor Goetz +1 Jake Farrell +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 Sergio Fernández +1 Julian Hyde Julian - To

Podlings in phonebook

The quickstep podling does not appear in the phonebook[1]. Are there any steps we missed in setting up the podling? (I know this is an infrastructure question, but I have a feeling that we need to update some of our process documents.) Julian [1] https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?podlin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On May 13, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoProposal > > [ ] +1 Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubato

Re: Additional mentor steps?

My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and authorization) is that adding to asf-authorization-template on podling creation would be ok (since it is done only once per podling, by a mentor who presumably knows what they are doing) but adding to asf-authorization-template ea

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

I see code derived from Mondrian in the org.carbondata.core.carbon package[1] (I’m familiar with Mondrian’s code structure because I wrote it). Mondrian was originally EPL and as such cannot be re-licensed under ASL. Everything is probably fine, but as part of incubation, we will need to make su

  1   2   3   4   >