"Trust is the basis of a healthy community"
-- For sure.
"and RTC (via Jira or otherwise) just screams "we don't trust you. we
must review all commits first.""
-- I disagree. RTC has merit independent of concerns of trust. If
trust issues are present in a community then any number of challenge
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome of
> the CTR/RTC exchange in the project.
>
> Hence changing my vote to
> -1 [binding]
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:47AM, Konstantin Boudnik wro
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> — Hitesh
>
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
>> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF I
+1 (non-binding).
Solid apache mentors and team. Good luck!
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether
> Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted
> below and is available o
John,
The language within the header of those files includes things like the
following as found in ltmain.sh
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License,
# if you distribute this file as part of a program or library that
# is built using GNU Libtool, you may include this file under
Hello
This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Of course! I'd be happy to help
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Can I add your to the proposa
As we grow the Beam community we will configure
>> our build process to require and validate all contributions and
>> dependencies are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license or are under an
>> Apache-compatible license.
>>
>> == Required Resources ==
>>
>> === Mai
Justin,
Speaking from the NiFi side I can assure you an enormous amount of
time, energy, and communication go into LICENSE and NOTICE handling
for this project. We've had discussions with PMC and committers of
other projects to learn their approach as well as to encourage them to
follow these pol
+1 (non-binding)
Very interesting and hope to participate.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept
> Gossip into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The Gossip proposal can be found here [2] and is also listed bel
/release
review diligence but I can sure try to help take the edge off!
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> Welcome Joseph!
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>> From: mar...@rectangular.com
>> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:48:35 -0700
>> Subject: Joe Witt jo
believe Pirk is
> classified as ECCN 5D002. In the event that it becomes necessary we will
> engage with appropriate Apache members to ensure we file any necessary
> paperwork or clarified any cryptographic export license concerns.
>
> == Required Resources ==
>
> ===
27;s a chance it will be heard, read, or typed incorrectly it
> should--if it can--be avoided. This one just seems too easy to get wrong.
>
> Hope that helps!
> Benjamin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7
e Foundation;
>> the Software Grant Agreement is forth coming.
>>
>> == External Dependencies ==
>>
>> We believe all current dependencies are compatible with the ASF guidelines.
>> Our dependency licenses come from the Apache v 2.0 and Eclipse Public v1.
>
any cryptographic export license concerns.
>
> Required Resources
>
> Mailing Lists
>
> d...@pirk.incubator.apache.org
>
> priv...@pirk.incubator.apache.org
>
> comm...@pirk.incubator.apache.org
>
> Source Control
>
> Pirk requests use of Git
Is this what you're looking for
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I remember we used to have a checklist of things published
> somewhere, but I can't find it anymore? What I'm talking about
>
+1 (bindng).
Conducted a review focused largely on mechanics of the source release
and licensing. Findings as follows:
good
- hashes check out
- signature checks out
- source release license/notice/3party license references look great!
nicely done
- full clean build w/out tests + apache-rat:chec
+1 (binding)
Review focused on the source release mechanics specifically around
build/licensing.
Signature checks out w/SHA512
Hashes all check out
Verified last meaningful commit in specific tag found in source.
Full clean build as per instructions found in readme worked perfectly.
Commentary:
+1 binding
On Jan 7, 2017 2:20 PM, "Edward Zhang" wrote:
> +1
> Glad to see Range will graduate!
>
> Thanks
> Edward
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Drew Farris wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On S
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On Mar 29, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Casey Stella wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I propose that we graduate Apache Metron (incubating) from the incubator.
>>> The full text o
Jon,
It appears that the code at [1] was initially committed on Mar 8,
2016. The code in Apache Metron [2] was committed on April 13, 2016.
The code in Metron [2] appears heavily derived from the code in the
initial repository [1].
In the Metron repository that code has an ASL v2 license and th
and found that the original
>> > bro-kafka-plugin code[1] first appeared in the Metron repo on February 8,
>> > 2016. My apologies for not properly linking this in my first email, I
>> > hadn't realized it was moved.
>> >
>> > 1:
>> >
+1 (binding)
On Apr 13, 2017 11:25 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 4/25/17, 1:27 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:48 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ashu
+1 (binding)
Verified source bundle signature and hashes and disclaimer.
Verified build and distribution artifact (no live testing).
Tephra release vote findings/improvements for consideration:
1) Use of md5 hashes worth removing in future releases
2) Copyright year in source and binary notice
3)
Hello
Can I please have access to edit the wiki? I'd like to submit a project
proposal.
I've already created a wiki user.
User: JosephWitt
Email: joe dot witt at gmail dot com
Thanks
Joe
Thanks Nick
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Can I please have access to edit the wiki? I'd like to submit a project
>> proposal.
>>
>
>
Hello,
I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
proposal can be found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
Thanks
Joe
= NiFi Proposal =
== Abstract ==
NiFi is a dataflow system based on the con
> > time on my plate, but really happy and will try and monitor and help
> > > on the lists.
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > ++
> > > Chris Mattm
doesn't seem to be it.
> 2. What is the overlap with Apache Camel (if any)?
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/Nifi
>
>
>
> On 11/19/2014 09:02 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose NiFi as a
ion to join the IPMC and we can go
> from there.
>
> - Josh
>
>
> Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
>>
>> In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
>>
similar problems to NiFi is a good
sign that multiple projects and communities can co-exist within the space
and even provide complimentary capability.
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Really appreciate it and have updated the proposal.
>
&g
fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:
> Very interesting project!
> I'm happy to help mentoring it.
>
>
> On 20/11/14 03:02, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
>>
>> In addition to the copy
ust let me know.
Thanks
Joe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> ...
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
>
> Note that AFAICS some of the nominated mentors are not members
gt;
>>>>>>> At this time there is no NiFi documentation on the web. However, we
>>>>>>>> have extensive documentation included within the application that
>>>>>>>> details usage of the many functions. We will be rapidly expanding
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> available documentation to cover things like installation, developer
>>
Andrew - I've updated the proposal to reflect you as a mentor.
* Andrew Purtell (Salesforce) , IPMC Member
Thanks again
Joe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now
> that the vote for incubation
John,
I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of
the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing
so now though to avoid any confusion.
Thanks
Joe
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Is it me or has the proposal chan
It was requested by Benson.
On Dec 6, 2014 6:40 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> All,
>
> Please see below change by Joseph Witt.
>
> He signed off on the NiFi report on behalf of Benson.
>
> Is that generally considered to be OK?
>
> John
>
> On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 10:21:13 PM Apache Wiki
> wrote:
>
On the dev@nifi.I.a.o mailing list.
On Dec 6, 2014 7:14 AM, "Joe Witt" wrote:
> It was requested by Benson.
> On Dec 6, 2014 6:40 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Please see below change by Joseph Witt.
>>
>> He signe
The exact thread is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-nifi-dev/201412.mbox/%3CCALJK9a7OzgKTNh0R9qpqD8_pCmOXpqN4yagQCSkTY6zQQayp3g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Thanks
Joe
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> On the dev@nifi.I.a.o mailing list.
> On Dec 6, 2014 7
Hello
I am a very new participant in Apache and a member of the ppmc for apache
nifi (incubating).
So I thought it would be good to share that perspective for this
discussion...
In writing the NiFi proposal this section was honestly a bit awkward. The
other sections are largely about providing
Benson,
Speaking from within the nifi ppmc I'd be happy to try this. Most of us in
the nifi ppmc (excluding the mentors) are quite new to Apache so we're
either perfect because we lack any of the biases or terrible because we're
too ignorant to the good and bad. But I for one would be happy to h
John,
I am not quite sure how to do that. Where can I find that?
The mentor list we have is from here:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html
Thanks
Joe
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I see you updated your mentor sign off list. This list now does
asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
>
>
> On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 3:12:00 PM Joe Witt wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > I am not quite sure how to do that. Where can I find that?
> >
> > The mentor list we have is from here:
> > http://incubator.apache.or
Hello
The Apache NiFi (incubating) team is pleased to be calling this vote for
the source release of Apache
NiFi 0.0.1-incubating.
With six binding (in the ppmc sense) +1 votes and no dissenting votes the
PPMC has approved the vote for the release in this thread:
http://s.apache.org/nifi-rc3
We
t; don't
> >> have license info for their bundled dependencies, but they do all have
> >> DEPENDENCIES files listing this information. I haven't worked with
> these
> >> dependencies files before. Are they sufficient for communicating
> license
> >> inf
ks
Joe
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> > Will investigate how to have the build process for the convenience
> binaries
> > not add the auto-generated dependencies file and for it to use our
> licens
15 at 10:23 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Billie
>
> My concern with the dependencies file is the false sense of security it
> can sometimes give. These are dependencies for which Maven can find the
> license information. If it can't it isn't something that could be clearly
>
Hello,
The IPMC vote passes.
The IPMC vote thread is here:
http://s.apache.org/nifi-0.0.1-ipmc-voteresult
Summary:
6 (binding) [+1]
0 [<= 0]
The following binding +1 votes were received:
- Sergio Fernandez
- Drew Farris
- Andrew Purtell
- Justin Mclean
- Benson Margulies
- Jan Iversen
All
Julian
Take a look here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
Also in the checklist for things to validate
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list It
calls out the disclaimer.
As a rep from a project that just finally cracked th
frastructure, communications, and decision making process have
> stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While
> incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or
> stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be
&g
Hello
The Apache NiFi PPMC has voted to release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating.
The vote was based on the release candidate described below.
We now request the IPMC to vote on the release.
Here is the PPMC voting result:
6 +1 (binding)
0 <= 0 (binding)
Two of the +1 votes were from IPMC members.
Hello,
The IPMC vote to release Apache NiFi 0.0.2-incubating passes.
The IPMC vote thread is here:
http://s.apache.org/nifi-0.0.2-ipmc-voteresult
Summary:
4 (binding) [+1]
0 [<= 0]
The following binding +1 votes were received:
- Sergio Fernandez
- Justin Mclean
- Benson Margulies
- Billie R
Hello
The Apache NiFi team is excited to announce the release of Apache NiFi
0.0.2-incubating.
Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to
process and distribute data. Apache NiFi was made for dataflow. It
supports highly configurable directed graphs of data routing,
transfo
Hello
The apache nifi dev list has had a few requests and discussions about
starting a user mailing list. I submitted the JIRA request for it
today under here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462
But was advised to have the PMC chair submit the request and by doing
so through this
Can it be the same moderators as dev@nifi?
Believe that is myself (joewitt) and Tony Kurc (tkurc)
Thanks
Joe
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Who would you like as the moderators for the new list?
>
> -Jake
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:42 AM,
Gavin,
Appreciate your help. I am doing exactly what you asked and following
the trail of guidance.
Thanks
Joe
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>> On 17 Apr 2015, at 3:42 pm, Joe Witt wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> The apache nifi de
Justin,
First, thanks for attempting to validate the release. You will need
to build all three components mentioned above in order. The error you
note suggests that the nifi-parent was not built before attempting the
build of nifi-0.1.0.
We expect most releases to be much easier to validate tha
Aldrin Piri
Ricky Saltzer
Bryan Bende
Jason Carey
Alex Moundalexis
Bobby Owolabi
Andrew Hulbert
+0 = 0
-1 = 0
We’d like to initiate this discussion/proposal to establish a
consensus within the incubator and if appropriate will initiate a
vote.
Below is our proposed resolution:
Thank you
Joe Witt (on
Hello
> it would be nice to see a bit of statistics like number of releases in
> incubator, growth in incubator…
Mailing lists:
The dev mailing list has 123 legit addresses on it and is quite active
for discussion, votes, feature ideas, etc.. We’ve just recently
created a user list as requested
Sean is one of those folks i referred to. Id be an easy +1
On Jun 12, 2015 9:24 AM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
> As Sean says he's been engaged with the project while acting as mentor,
> IMHO beyond mentor-ly duties. If the NiFi folks will have him on the
> initial PMC and he's willing to join it,
for asking the questions, but I was insecure.
>>
>> rgds
>> jan i
>>
>> On Friday, June 12, 2015, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> > Sean sure makes more sense than me.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt > > > wrote
osition to determine what is
> suitable. The community + mentors should be a better group to discuss it.
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Niclas,
>>
>> I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act
>> of course.
reeing to the resolution,
> so changes should in my opinion by discussed on your dev@ list.
>
> The IPMC should be presented with a resolution that the community agrees
> on.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> On 14 June 2015 at 17:18, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> > Adjusted to clar
NiFi proposal to make the
>> Board meeting this week?
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:26 PM, jan i wrote:
>>
>> > On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt wrote:
>> >
>> > > The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be
>>
do so, so hopefully this won't cause a delay.
>
> -Sean
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> Sean sure makes more sense than me.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>> > Sean is one of thos
Hello Apache Incubator
This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation
of Apache NiFi.
Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html
Incubator graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/wmy
NiFi community graduation vote: http://s.apache.org/GT9
The discussio
15 at 12:05 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
>> Hello Apache Incubator
>>
>> This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation
>> of Apache NiFi.
>>
>> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html
>> Incubator graduation
John,
The clause as written right now doesn't speak to the ASF level bylaws.
It gives the PMC the specific tasking to create bylaws. If not
removed the language should probably change to not encourage creation
of new bylaws but rather understand the implicit adoption of the ASF
level bylaws.
Tha
+1 binding.
would be interested to participate as a mentor
thanks
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 12:53 PM Matt Sicker +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 08:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 11/7/2018 2:46 AM, hxd wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Sorry for the previous mail with bad for
Hello
In general with all such things ASF and licensing a great place to start
for information is here [1]. It lays out the different categories and how
ASF Legal has designated a given license.
The way to really consider this largely comes down to whether you package
that binary in a release yo
Greg
It isnt wrong to correct improper usage particularly when there is a
specific case that caused actual confusion.
That should be done by the person that was confused and with the person
that caused confusion.
Joe
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> I have witnessed actual
+1(binding)
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> +1 ( binding )
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:00 PM Dominik Riemer wrote:
> > > [X ] +1, bring StreamPipes into the Incubator..
>
72 matches
Mail list logo
