Request to add project proposal to Incubator Wiki.

t me! It currently has a google site with links to the code, documentation, and community: https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/ Thanks! -- James Bognar

Re: Request to add project proposal to Incubator Wiki

jects status on the home page. Until the project makes it through incubation there is technically no "Apache Juneau" just "Apache Juneau (incubating)." > > /me channels Shane Curcuru for a bit. ;) > > That said, all the best as you go through incubation! > Benjamin -- James Bognar

Re: Request to add project proposal to Incubator Wiki.

Thanks John! I've added a new page... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JuneauProposal I guess my next step is to find a Champion? > James, > > I've added you, please edit away. > > If you're in need of a mentor, I'd be happy to help. > > John -- James Bognar

[DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

reate sophisticated REST server/client interfaces. The link to the proposal can be found here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JuneauProposal Thanks. -- James Bognar

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

t will be maintained and hosted in a separate !GitHub repository. The codebase is mature and tested. The code and documentation is up-to-date. It includes 3000+ JUnit testcases that ensure that POJOs are represented consistently across all supported content types. === Meritocracy === Juneau wa

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

orer 11 on > Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64. > > It would be helpful, perhaps, if the JavaDocs were accessible via HTTP > directly. > > Having said all of that, this is certainly an interesting prospect. > > - Dennis > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jam

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

The list of POJOs supported is listed here: http://jamesbognar.github.io/juneau-docs/doc/overview-summary.html#Core.PojoCategories On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > I don't have IE 11 readily available, so I can't verify the report of a &

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

t; > > > >> -----Original Message- > >> From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51 > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incu

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

I'm curious to know if anyone else is using IE 11 and got the same virus alert as Dennis. I took a look at the file it was complaining about and it's just a pretty straightforward javascript file. I don't know why it would be marked as a virus. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:25 P

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

e these titles and descriptions to a more neutral > "proposed > > Apache Incubator project"? You don't need to change the package names > > before code import, but I would say having a Google site with "apache" in > > its URL and title is misleading.

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

approved? On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:01 PM, James Bognar wrote: > @Stian, > > Thanks for joining! > > I'll remove the references to Apache from the site. I'm new to the > process and thought I could get a leg-up by rebranding it before incubation. > > The Goog

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

@Niall, Thanks for your interest. Other current ideas for development 1) MessagePack support. 2) YAML support. 3) Convert microservice API to be OSGi-based. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar > > wrote: >

[VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

participate in VOTE. -- James Bognar ### PROPOSAL ### = Juneau Toolkit = == Abstract == Apache Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated self-documenting REST interfaces and microservices using VERY little code

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E -- Forwarded message -- From: James Bognar Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org Hi all, It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a vote on

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

> Please note, both Bertrand and I are binding votes. > > > > Don't rely on the voter to indicate whether they are binding or not, > always > > check against http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?ctte=incubator > > If they're in that list, they're binding. &

Fwd: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

22 invoked for bounce); 27 Jun 2016 14:20:29 - Date: 27 Jun 2016 14:20:29 - From: mailer-dae...@apache.org To: dev-return...@juneau.incubator.apache.org Subject: failure notice -- James Bognar

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

SSING_MID=0.14, > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, > > RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] > autolearn=disabled > > Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) > > by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) > (amavisd-new, > > port 10024) > > with ESMTP id xL0oKNYLRUmP for >; > > Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:20:30 + (UTC) > > Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) > > by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org > ) > > with SMTP id EA5315FB35 > > for ; Mon, 27 Jun > 2016 > > 14:20:29 + (UTC) > > Received: (qmail 32522 invoked for bounce); 27 Jun 2016 14:20:29 - > > Date: 27 Jun 2016 14:20:29 - > > From: mailer-dae...@apache.org > > To: dev-return...@juneau.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: failure notice > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James Bognar > > -- James Bognar

Re: Apache Example project?

a proposal...? :-) > > 1. https://vimeo.com/171210141 > 2. https://github.com/ <https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat> > justinmclean <https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat>/ > <https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat>ApacheWombat > <https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat> > -- James Bognar

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

7;t object [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... -- James Bognar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

e/juneau/ > server/samples/averycutedog.jpg > 11. https://dojotoolkit.org/license.html > 12. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary > 13. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle > > > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- James Bognar

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

This vote passed with +3 (all binding) Justin Mclean John D. Ament Craig L. Russel Thanks everyone who helped out! -- James Bognar

[ANNOUNCE] Juneau 6.0.0 Released

The Apache Juneau team is happy to announce our first deliverable under the Apache brand: Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating! Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using a common framework. - A REST ser

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

Board meeting > > Please note: the board meeting will be overlapping with ApacheCon EU in > Seville. There will be some kind of live meeting on site. > > John > -- James Bognar

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

I thought so. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks! On Tuesday, November 1, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi James, > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:45 PM James Bognar > > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > I don't see Juneau listed in the incubator report.

Re: JSON License and Apache Projects

Shameless plug for Apache Juneau that has a cleanroom implementation of a JSON serializer and parser in context of a common serialization API that includes a variety of serialization languages for POJOs. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:10 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > The VP Legal for Apache has determined

Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

he-juneau-6.0.1-incubating-src.zip.md5 dev/incubator/juneau/source/juneau-6.0.1-incubating-RC3/ apache-juneau-6.0.1-incubating-src.zip.sha1 Removed: dev/incubator/juneau/binaries/juneau-6.0.1-incubating-RC2/ dev/incubator/juneau/source/juneau-6.0.1-incubating-RC2/ -- James Bognar

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +4 to release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating RC3. This vote carries over +4 binding votes from IPMC mentors. Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide varie

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3

Yea...that's my cat. I thought I did sign it with an Apache email address. I'll recheck that. On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > > - name includes incubating > > - disclaimer exists > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are good > > - no unexpec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3

Yea...that's exactly what I thought I did. On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM Craig Russell wrote: > > > > On Dec 29, 2016, at 6:30 PM, James Bognar > wrote: > > > > > > Yea...that's my cat. > > > > > > I thought I did sign it with a

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3

After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3 passed with 6 +1s (5 binding) and no 0 or -1. +1s: James Bognar John D Ament (binding) Jochen Wiedmann (binding) Craig L Russell (binding) Stian Soiland-Reyes (binding) Justin Mclean (binding) The issue

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.1.0-incubating-RC2

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+3* to release Apache Juneau 6.1.0-incubating RC2. This vote carries over *+2* binding votes from IPMC mentors: Steve Blackmon: +1 John D Ament: +1 Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.1.0-incubating-RC2

]" with a comma? On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:05:26 -0500, James Bognar > wrote: > > The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+3* to release Apache Juneau > > 6.1.0-incubating RC2. > > The binaries are ava

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.1.0-incubating-RC2

This vote passed with +4 (+3 binding): Stian Soiland-Reyes (binding) John D. Ament (binding) Craig Russell (binding) Steve Blackmon (not binding) Thanks everyone for your vote! James Bognar

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Juneau 6.1.0 Released

Hi everyone, The Apache Juneau team is proud to announce the release of Juneau 6.1.0! For those unfamiliar with the project, we've updated the web page with lots of new information. We've added some exciting new features in this release such as HTML5 beans and enhance

Slack

Can someone remind me? I thought there was a discussion a couple of months ago about allowing incubator projects to use Slack for communication. What was the final decision?

Re: Slack support?

t? Presently ASF has support for HipChat and Gitter, but I see more > podlings coming in asking for Slack support. > > John > -- James Bognar

Re: Slack support?

unt in case all of the admins disappear. > > > > -Bertrand > > > > ----- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- James Bognar

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding votes from IPMC mentors. John D Ament Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs t

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

Sorry everyone, but I need to cancel this vote due to a discrepancy in the PPMC vote. I'll resubmit this shortly. Thanks! On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:46 AM, James Bognar wrote: > The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau > 6.2.0-incubating RC1. This v

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+5* to release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over *+2* binding votes from IPMC mentors. Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide v

Re: Incubator Governance Change

to sue, they'd sue the Foundation > (which has insurance and legal counsel) and not individual committers. > > -- > > - Shane, IPMC Member > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- James Bognar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

Reminder that the deadline for this vote has passed and we still need 1 more binding vote. Thanks! On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Bringing over my +1 > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:26 AM James Bognar > wrote: > > > The Apache Juneau Incubator P

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.2.0-incubating-RC1

This vote passed with +1s (all binding) John D. Ament Craig Russel Jochen Wiedmann Thanks all for those who voted! James Bognar

Emailing images.

Since images are lost on apache emails, what have other teams done if they want to include images on messages to their dev list account? What are our options? Upload to Imgur and attach URL? Other ideas?

Images in source code.

I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling. I created them myself. Are there any best-practices on how to mark these as Apache licensed?

Re: Images in source code.

Thanks! I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote: > >> I just added several png file

Re: Images in source code.

s called out is if there is > provenance that these images came from somewhere else. If these images > were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we > would have a concern. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > On Jun 2, 2017, a

Re: Images in source code.

> Agreed. What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is > provenance that these images came from somewhere else. If these images > were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we > would have a concern. > > > > > > Craig > >

Re: Images in source code.

> Agreed. What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is > provenance that these images came from somewhere else. If these images > were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we > would have a concern. > > > > > > Craig &

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.0-incubating-RC1

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau 6.3.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC members. John D. Ament Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.0-incubating-RC1

y +1 from dev list. > > John > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:44 AM James Bognar > wrote: > > > The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau > > 6.3.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC > > members. > > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.0-incubating RC1

This vote passed with 4 +1s (all binding) John D. Ament Steve Blackmon Justin Mclean Thanks everyone who voted! James Bognar On 2017-06-28 04:41 (-0400), sebb wrote: > On 28 June 2017 at 00:52, James Bognar wrote:> > > Quick reminder that we are passed the deadline and only hav

Guidance on copyrights in sample code.

Need some quick guidance. On the release vote for Juneau 6.3.0, Justin Mclean made this note... "There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation” in the documentation you may want to update the year." I tracked it down to sample code where the copyright statement itself was sample code

Re: Guidance on copyrights in sample code.

uot; which obviously would be an invalid copyright used only for > demonstration purposes. (for those unfamiliar, US Copyright law started in > 1976, entities prior to that date wouldn't have been valid). > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2017 2:38 PM, "James Bognar"

Re: Guidance on copyrights in sample code.

u could be thinking relative to 1976. > > Also, why make the example strange? Why not take a real copyright header > for an example? > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2017 2:38 PM, "James Bognar" wrote: > > > > > Need some quick guidance. > > > &

Re: Guidance on copyrights in sample code.

probably how you would want to do it anyway, considering the task > of updating copyright years should be limited to one file per distribution > in downstream users, similar to the single copyright notice that an Apache > project has in its distribution. > > Craig > > > On Jul

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.1-incubating-RC1

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau 6.3.1-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +2 binding votes from IPMC members. Steve Blackmon, +1 Jochen Wiedmann, +1 Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A universa

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.1-incubating-RC1

> 2. Verified sigs and hashes > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:31 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > >> +1 to release > >> > >> On 2017-07-25 09:41 (-0400), James Bognar > wrote: > >>> The Apache Juneau Incubator PP

Re: Leave me alone

That's rude and disrespectful. Why can't you just leave poor Kacie alone? Hasn't she gone through enough? On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > FYI: I have unsubscribed this user using my infra karma. > > Mark > > On 30/08/17 03:11, $recordS9090 wrote: > > > > > > kacie karo > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating-RC3

The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +4 to release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating RC3. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC members. - Steve Blackmon Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Juneau is... - A toolkit for marshalling P

Juneau PPMC graduation vote in progress.

FYI The Juneau PPMC has started their graduation vote.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating-RC3

This vote passed with 3 +1s (all binding). Steve Blackmon Craig Russell John D. Ament Thanks for those who voted! James Bognar On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 10:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 to release > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:55 PM James Bognar > wrote: > > > The Ap

[VOTE] Graduate the Apache Juneau podling from Incubator to a TLP

to serve as the initial members of the Apache Juneau Project: * Craig L Russell * David Goddard * James Bognar * Jochen Wiedmann * John D. Ament * Peter Haumer * Raphi D Lee * Steve Blackmon * Stian Soiland-Reyes NOW, THEREFORE,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate the Apache Juneau podling from Incubator to a TLP

Hi Raphael, The affiliations for the initial members are as follows: John D. Ament, Apache Steve Blackmon, Apache Streams James Bognar, Salesforce Peter Haumer, IBM David M Goddard, IBM Raphi D Lee, No affiliation Craig L Russell, Apache Stian Soiland-Reyes, Apache On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate the Apache Juneau podling from Incubator to a TLP

(binding), +1 Thanks to all who took their time to review and vote on this submission. And special thanks to the mentors who spent so much of their time shepherding this project over the past 15+ months. James Bognar On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct

Re: Podling use of StackOverflow

My $.02. Apache is sorely in need of a portal similar to StackOverflow. I, like many other software developers, primarily use Google for finding answers. 90% of the time those answers are going to be found on StackOverflow. Answers on mailing lists are not going to show up in Google results, an