hi oliver,
> (1) Where can I get the (tentative) JCR API?
you can download the snapshot that was out for public review
in may-2004
( http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr170/index.html )
which is a quite a bit outdated now. or you can get the binaries that
are used by maven to buil
hi oli,
thanks for your comments. i really appreciate your interest.
> first of all let me say that I really appreciate your help! Second,
> let me say that I have no reservations concerning Jackrabbit and
> certainly do not see it as a threat to Slide or the other way round
> (which others seeme
> I hereby nominate Jukka Zitting ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on the
> basis of his sustained interest, quality of work, and desire
> to contribute to the project on a long-term basis. Please vote
> with your +1 for yes, +0 for abstain, or -1 (not at this time).
+1
regards,
david
> I hereby nominate Dominique Pfister (dominique.pfister day.com)
> on the basis of his sustained interest, quality of work, and desire
> to contribute to the project on a long-term basis. Please vote
> with your +1 for yes, +0 for abstain, or -1 (not at this time).
> Naturally, only the votes com
hi all,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> None of the above issues is a blocker, but the sum of the parts
> doesn't give me exactly a warm, fuzzy feeling. I would appreciate the
> proponents having a discussion with Chemistry first. If OpenCMIS,
> however, prefers to sk
hi all,
here are my two cents.
i believe the cmis community is too small to fork at this point
and at least the chemistry part of the community does not want
to fork (at least that's my take, as a part of it).
so i would personally assume that all chemistry committers
would join the opencmis ini
+1
regards,
david
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC members (*),
>
> I've just reviewed the "[PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator" thread
> and I think all relevant issues have been adressed now.
>
> I have added Anne and Dave Fisher as mentors, pend
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:57 PM, David Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure exactly what else needs to go into the software grant
>> process. I still have not gotten an answer to my question about our
>>
Hi Jukka,
Just a random thought.
"to move the codebase *and* to bring the mapping tool
developers in as Jackrabbit committers"
This is probably stating the obvious (my apologies):
If there is no precedent that we could align with, then we possibly
could look at this particular case j
