On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1
The proposal says that this library has a "complete locale
implementation". I'm wondering about the possibilities for code reuse
when/if we start on a second generation of apr-icon
On 30.01.2014 21:16, Kowalski, Francois-Xavier wrote:
> My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform:
Because it's well-known that API implementations are never
platform-specific. :)
> *-js/
> *-objc/
> *-cs/
>
>
> —FiX
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbne
On 26.08.2014 00:24, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
>> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
>> need.
> Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
Bloodhound has
On 02.09.2014 15:51, Dave wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> So... do you have a 1.0 artifact staged somewhere? I get that it's a
>> rebuild of RC4, but I don't see that release referenced anywhere on your
>> site.
>>
> The release files are here: http://people.ap
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hi John
> I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
> release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
> previous version up accidentally. This is very common and currently done in
> many TLP's including Thri
On 02.09.2014 23:06, Dave wrote:
> Rats. That directory should not have been included in the release. It
> is created as part of the build process and the contents are fetched
> by Bower (similar to how Maven pulls in jars). Thanks for your
> attention to detail. I will have a new set of release fi
On 23.09.2014 14:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> I like Lens indeed.
Sooo ... I suppose the PMC chair will be called the Grey Lensman then? :)
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For ad
On 27.09.2014 05:38, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> I believe it will be needing a usual place to publish releases
Release tarballs go here before the release vote starts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ignite
After the vote passes, they should be moved here:
On 28.09.2014 02:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache
> Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos
> as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be
> Mentors.
>
On 26.09.2014 20:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM,
On 01.10.2014 05:41, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>> To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
>>> [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and th
or/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml?rev=1631099&r1=1631098&r2=1631099&view=diff
>> ==
>> --- incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml [utf-8] (original)
>> +++ incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml [utf-8] Sat Oct
On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote:
> For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries"
> that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that
> are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently
> include a binary tar b
On 21.10.2014 06:34, Alex Harui wrote:
> What is the piece I’m missing that says we have to vote to update the
> binary package?
Apparently the Flex community believes that convenience binaries need
votes. They don't, but aside from that, if you guys are already voting
on binary packages, it makes
On 21.10.2014 15:55, Harbs wrote:
> The one thing I see missing from the proposed text is dependencies and
> installers.
>
> Particularly this section:
> ### Compiled packages ### {#compiled-packages}
>
> The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases
> are in the form
On 03.11.2014 16:49, Stack wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Naresh Agarwal
> wrote:
>
>> Just curious if HTrace is aimed only for Hadoop infrastructure/Hadoop based
>> applications or it can be used in any Java based systems?
>>
>>
> HTrace's provenance is Hadoop but the only hadoop 'taint
On 03.11.2014 19:12, Stack wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 03.11.2014 16:49, Stack wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Naresh Agarwal <
>> naresh.agar...@inmobi.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On 05.11.2014 16:05, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> Venkatesh Seetharam is extremely active on the project, but couldn't vote
> on this thread,
Why not? Are you guys by any chance treating project committers and PPMC
members differently?
-- Brane
---
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
> I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.
This is an unreasonable request. The IPMC voted on the 3.4.0 release.
The notice file has not changed between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. How then do you
justify this new requirement?
It is not fair to the
On 21.08.2012 17:29, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>> On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>> On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
>>>>> I think the NO
On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote:
> Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says
"convenience" and defines version numbering requirements, but it does
On 26.08.2012 16:46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The point most people seem to make out of "sanctioned"
> or "official" builds revolves around indemnifying volunteers
> involved in the production of the release.
>
>
> I'm tired of rehashing release.html for the umpteenth time
> simply because Brane or yo
On 26.08.2012 17:04, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Waah Brane- obviously you're not as community-oriented
> as you'd like to think. release.html is the byproduct
> of several years of writing oriented towards the lowest
> common denominator of the org, but if you think you know
> how to improve it you hav
On 08.10.2012 13:44, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 8:54 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: key signing
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Jukka Zitting
>>
On 08.10.2012 17:43, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> What guarantee do you have that a particular Skype ID is whoever you
>> think it is? None at all, unless the person involved looked at your
>> Skype contact list and
On 10.10.2012 00:01, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> While this protocol does not rely heavily on validating
> government-issued IDs, the Debian guidelines quoted above point out
> that some people object to giving such IDs too much creedence:
So instead of giving too much credence to government-issued I
On 29.10.2012 15:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
> Bloodhound PPMC.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
> http://markmail.org/thre
On 08.11.2012 19:08, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
> Marvin: Thank you for the helpful feedback. I will discuss this with the
> other devs and raise tickets for us as appropriate. I believe Hyrum has not
> yet voted to my knowledge, only Brane. So we still need two votes at this
> point.
Hyrum voted +1.
On 10.11.2012 14:39, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Apologies for the delay, the conference wifi was taken down before I could
> send the e-mail.
>
> Unfortunately, when I ran a license header check, the report came back
> with some minified css & js files in the source release. As far as I am
> aw
On 19.11.2012 13:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
>>> Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the n
On 26.11.2012 16:59, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
> Bloodhound PPMC.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
> http://markmail.org/threa
It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
tarball from a podling.
Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release
every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for
On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Joachim Dreimann <
> joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by
On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
>> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
>> tarball from a podl
On 01.12.2012 16:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
> an issue summary once a week?
That's certainly one thing I considered.
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
On 04.12.2012 06:35, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> Benson,
>
> I agree. There was some progress in mavenizing the build. I suspect that
> that solution will take some time. The build process is somewhat
> complicated at the moment, if this is the long term solution, we may need
> to do something si
I find myself unable, as a Bloodhound mentor, to sign off their report
for December. Can I please get karma to edit the Incubator wiki? My
wiki username is "brane".
Thanks,
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...
On 11.12.2012 23:21, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Jukka Zitting: Bloodhound
> The report looks pretty good - they've added a few new committers and
> cut some releases after their previous report. The report, like the
> previous one,
On 12.12.2012 03:22, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> Also - there's a fairly new startup in San Francisco area going by the same
> name Bloodhound (see http://bloodhound.com/). I'm not associated with them,
> just happened to hear about them. It's obviously not in the same business
> but given how Apache p
On 27.12.2012 08:41, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hi Marcel,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marcel Offermans
>> wrote:
>>> -1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and
>>> LICENSE f
On 02.01.2013 01:09, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> In the process of cleaning up photark, I noticed that very few
> incubating projects have DOAP files.
At the risk of appearing a total idiot (as if I usually don't), I have
to ask: what is a DOAP file and what is it good for?
-- Brane
Following the discussions on members@ and comdev, the Apache Bloodhound
developers have decided[1] to relax the ACL governing access to the
Bloodhound code so that as of now, any ASF committer has commit access.
Of course this does not waive potential contributors' duty to engage
with the Bloodhou
On 17.01.2013 23:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> ...
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding)
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisc
On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
>> (incubating)
>> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>>
>> The vote PPMC vote thread:
>>
On 23.01.2013 18:42, Gary Martin wrote:
> Regarding the original suggestion, a web based tool would only seem to
> be useful if the problem is associated with IPMC members not noticing
> rather than not feeling that they have time to do proper reviews.
That's a fair point. Still, I've decided to h
A while ago I proposed we should have a status page showing current
pending votes.
To this end I've begun writing a simple script that parses the
general@incubator Atom feed from Markmail and creates a static web page
with information gleaned from there (it keeps longer-term data in a
SQLite datab
On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
>> There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
>> a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
>> and doe
n the table, and the absolute time in
>> tooltips?
>> That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> A while ago I proposed we should have a status page sh
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
>> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
>>> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
>>> looks like the Bloodhound vote is still ope
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
> indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
> list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
> list server.
I meant to say,
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>> On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
>>> sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to
On 25.01.2013 01:50, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> ...>>
>>>> I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
>>> Well, that clear enoug
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
general@. This solved t
On 25.01.2013 16:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
>> contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
> I'll bet that Ryan
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
>> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
>> list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
> Do yo
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
>> On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
>>>> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
> need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
metadata is in general good enough, since if clutch can generate
target/curre
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
>> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
>>> need to add a field to it we can.
>>
On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
>> On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
>>>> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
>&g
On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Branko!
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
>> needs to be updated?
> yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addr
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
>> ne
On 29.01.2013 17:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you send the usual [CANCELED] mail?
> It would help the script to put it to the right side:
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
Ha, you should read the script before posting. :)
It understands [CANCEL], [CANCELE
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>>&
On 29.01.2013 21:18, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> It understands [CANCEL], [CANCELED] (wrong) and [CANCELLED] (correct).
> I thought CANCELED is wrong myself, but then I read:
> http://www.reference.com/motif/language/can
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is updated every 4 hours.
-- Brane
---
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>> preview at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>>
&g
On 31.01.2013 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>> There is now an embedded version of the vo
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
>> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
>> know if we can have
On 01.02.2013 08:56, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> Closing the vote since its past 72 hours.
>
> The vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's. Will do the needful to push the release out.
The first needful is to send a proper [RESOLVED][VOTE] mail :)
-- Brane, quite touchy on the subject after writing the votes par
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>>> I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
>>> probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra
On 31.01.2013 14:13, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>>> preview at
>>>
>>> http://people.apach
Thanks for the reminder.
On 01.02.2013 16:42, sebb wrote:
> Please remember to publish the site after committing updates.
>
>
>
> On 1 February 2013 12:49, wrote:
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013
>> New Revision: 1441429
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441429&view=
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
>> preview at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
>>
>> By "embed
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
>>>>> I guess it
On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel S
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
>> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
>> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
> The only supported wa
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
>> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
> whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
>&
On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
>> On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
>>>> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to w
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> SVN source tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
Since when do source packages not have to
On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> SVN source tag
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repositor
On 23.01.2013 14:51, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!!
> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
>
> So IPMCs please cast your votes!
+1
I still wish the source package was easier to find.
-- Brane
On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
>> find the right package amongst 8 different source packages in 8
>> different directories.
> What do you mean with "right"? They all are "right", because they
> contain diffe
On 04.02.2013 01:05, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi Branko...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>> Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
>
> [X] +1 Graduate Apache Bloodhound podling from Apache Incubator
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 11.03.2013 05:04, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> Was the potential trademark conflict discussed somewhere? See
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201212.mbox/%3c50ca29ad.6000...@apache.org%3E-
> if so, just linking to the discussion is fine.
It was discussed on trademarks@; t
Just tagging the [RESULT] onto the subject so that the vote status gets
updated.
On 24.02.2013 04:36, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Hi folks,
> With 10 binding +1 votes, this vote has passed. Thanks to everyone who
> voted.
> Devaraj.
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>
On 25.02.2013 05:44, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Thanks to all who voted. Obviously, I'm +1 (binding) on the proposal.
>
> With 14 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
>
> I'll start the work to get the podling started.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
On 07.03.2013 08:54, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Thanks to all who voted! With 18 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
>
> I'll start the work to get the podling started.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
>> +1 non-binding
>>
>> Good luck
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 2,
On 18.03.2013 11:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> ...in the previous discussions were no objections against the graduation
>> of Apache Onami...
> Was there a community vote indicating a desire to graduate?
This is the commu
On 18.03.2013 11:35, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi
>
>Last time I checked the rules it state that, for such votes, the IPMC
> should be *notified* through general@
This VOTE is not a requirement but is recommended. It is unlikely
that IPMC members will vote to approve graduation unl
Is code for this available for review anywhere?
-- Brane
On 16.04.2013 19:46, serkan özal wrote:
> Project Name: Jillegal
>
>
> 1. Abstract:
> GC is one of the time taken operations in Java. GC run anytime, marks, swaps
> and compacts objects at memory. If there are so many live objects, managin
The voting status script relies on them to update its tables. Currently
there are a number of votes flagged as out of date:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
however, many (if not most) of them were actually cancelled, in some
cases replaced by another (successful) voting t
Leo Simons wrote:
> I have no idea what might be going on in your head, but from where I
> sit, it seems like you might be overreacting just a _bit_ to a
> tongue-in-cheek e-mail post script. Have some green tea.
>
There were also some suggestions about us making a release for the sake
of makin
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Yes, *AND* ensuring legal dots are put on the i's and j's. This is
> done through checking the release and ensuring that it is in adherence
> to our policies which you and others have crafted. *All* podlings have
> to ensure they have the correct licensing headers, notices
Igor Burilo wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>>> I certainly understand why license issues would be a concern. But I could
>>> use an education about why this particular case matters. We currently
>>>
> ship
>
>>> Neon in a separate tarball from Subversion's core code for the conv
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> I gave counsel to the Eclipse Foundation and explained that they could
>> provide a fully functioning JavaHL library to users with only EPL
>> compatible code. Basically, you just need to build without Neon, BDB
>> and libintl support. Of
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> LOL
>>
>> Well... the problem is that an "svn mv" from /incubator/subversion/ to
>> /subversion/ introduces an artificial breakage in the history. It is
>> actually quite disruptive for tracking history (which is
Igor Burilo wrote:
> Mark Phippard-3 wrote:
>
>>> I gave counsel to the Eclipse Foundation and explained that they could
>>> provide a fully functioning JavaHL library to users with only EPL
>>> compatible code. Basically, you just need to build without Neon, BDB
>>> and libintl support. Of th
Eric Evans wrote:
> Sure, but the IPMC is in a position of power, and can impose it's will
> upon the project (including CTR vs. RTC), right?
>
I have no clue whether the IPMC can impose such a decision. But I'm
very, very certain that it should not even consider trying. It's better
to ask the
Ralph Goers wrote:
> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
> In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
> will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely possible
> to create a separate jar containing th
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
