I count 11 binding votes for, 1 non-binding vote for, and no other
contributions to the process.
Barring any surprises, I plan to look for help in executing the
retirement process when I return on 17 July.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm going on vac
Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
So I won't preface each particular observation with 'In my
experience.'
There is a narrative around the Foundation about 'Diversity'. The
narrative goes like this: once upon a time, one (or more) projects
were predominantly staf
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
is an example that comdev might want to propagate?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
> So I won't p
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 12:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Niall Pemberton
>> wrote:
>>> ...my 2 cents would be to make it optional - keep it where theres a
>>> synergy and interest from a real project. Whe
+1 (mentor)
On Jul 23, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> +1
>
> Stefan
>
> On 2012-07-21, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>
>> The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a
>> success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing
>> l
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Marvin,
>
> While I (think I) can understand your concern (that it should be the
> mentors who are reviewing releases, not yet another group), I'd suggest
> that Jukka's approach might be a way to get there.
>
> The incubator release process is,
TWIMC,
Some weeks ago, after receiving no responses to email to this
projects' lists, the IPMC voted to shut down this podling. Since you
did not complete IP clearance, this calls for deleting any source from
svn. I'll do this in about a week, along with other cleanup.
--benson
gt; ..ant
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> TWIMC,
>>
>> Some weeks ago, after receiving no responses to email to this
>> projects' lists, the IPMC voted to shut down this podling. Since you
>> did not complete IP clear
I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
clearance status of projects. I need some help here.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> Hi Benson, AFAIK all the IP clearance was done, Kato has al
Please remind me of how to edit the clutch. It has an obsolete remark
about river.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
> clearance status of projects. I need some help here.
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15
.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kato-dev/200903.mbox/%3c71e1b5740903160445r4e9b9911m480860a46b0dd...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>...ant
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
>> clearance stat
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Please remind me of how to edit the clutch. It has an obsolete remark
>> about river.
>
> Clutch just needs to be re-run occasionally.
> See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#no
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>
>> ...I'd like to start fixing this by forming a "release task force" of a
>> handful of volunteers who are ready to invest an hour or two per week
>> to work onb) migrating
:
>> That leaves only the reviews to be done. Here's the latest TODO list:
>
> And an updated one:
>
> Benson Margulies - Syncope, Nuvem
> Dave Fisher - DeltaSpike
> Matt Franklin- Droids
> Matt Hogstrom- SIS, Wookie
> Mohammad Nour-
VCL has escaped the incubator while I was being slow.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I reviewed Syncope and found no cause for concern with their report.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
> wrote:
>> I reviewed droids and th
Nuvem seems adequately described. The report comment about small size
and slow growth seems accurate, but there's at least an active mentor
in the house and some things are happening.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> VCL has escaped the incubator while I was be
Henri,
Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking at?
--benson
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> The following projects haven
I need some more help here. The IPMC approved a release of kato, but
no one ever updated the status page to reflect copyright clearance.
What shall I do?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addit
ady
> licensed under a category A license.
I volunteered to deal with all this as an expansion of a Shepherd
assignment. I confess that I'm feeling a bit whelmed.
>
> Hen
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Henri,
>>
>> Ant p
ri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henri Yandell
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>> > Just
I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
situation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additiona
Would it be reasonable to suggest that the file names of grants in
documents/grants reflect the target project, somehow? Just having them
named after the grantor makes it a bit hard to track things down. If
not, now about some sort of readme file in the directory to which
pointers could be added?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 August 2012 18:20, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
>> Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
>
Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary.
Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their
releases, which have been, by definition, source.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
> Does "...based on Apache Hadoop" require a clear dependency notation as to
> which versions of Apache component releases are part of the commercial
> distribution?
No, it cannot. Trademark law is not a matter of such distinctions, and
our ve
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Coming in late.
>
> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
> release.
Are you sure? When you have a public source control repo, with a
LICENSE file at the top, I would think that this counts as a legal
'publication'
This thread started as a discussion of Linux distros and trademarks.
Perhaps I could try to return it there?
If a distro takes a release of Apache X, compiles it with minimal changes
that adapt it to the environment, and distributes it, I believe that it's a
fine thing for them to call it simple A
We will be rapidly expanding the
> > > >available documentation to cover things like installation, developer
> > > >guide, frequently asked questions, best practices, and more. This
> > > >documentation will be posted to the NiFi wiki at apache.org.
> > > >
I've advised Joe to 'asterix' the would-be mentors who are not iPMC yet, so
that he can proceed to a vote on the base of the ones who are sooner rather
than later, and the stragglers can be formally added to the metadata once
they are on the iPMC.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
n Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
> and
> > positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
> >
> > Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
> >
> > Here is my [+1]
> >
>
tup to Github through INFRA. We request
sponsor Benson Margulies (bimargulies) to assist with creating the
INFRA ticket for this.
=== Issue Tracking ===
JIRA Ni``Fi (NIFI)
=== Initial Committers ===
* Brandon De``Vries , CLA confirmed
* Jason Carey , CLA submitted
* Matt Gilman , CLA confi
The vote for NiFi incubation has passed. I will go start turning cranks.
Nonbinding +1:
Sean Busaby
Brock Noland
Ryan Blue
Joey Echeverria
Binding +1:
Tim Williams
Chris Mattmann
Suresh Srinivas
Chris Douglas
John D Ament
Benson Margulies
Jake Farrell
Andrew Purtell
Bertrand Delacretaz
Following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html, I ran 'ant' (and
also build.sh) after adding nifi to podlings.xml and added the nifi.xml
fille. It didn't produce any changed files to commit.
Is the guide behind? Am I confused?
One message here to make progress in public before we have NiFi mailing lists:
I've added nifi to podlings.xml and I've created nifi.xml.
I've opened INFRA-8706 for the mailing lists.
I plan to write one other JIRA for a git repo; after that, we need
discussion on the list to be sure of what we
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> Following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html, I ran 'ant' (and
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I suspect that only Roman and other VPs can do this.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html seems to be claiming
the contrary.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:23 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyon
Oh, that was not my smartest moment. Should I change the xml file to
move out a month? I don't think we've got something worth reporting.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> One message he
Starting with a December report makes sense. So, group changes too.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:27 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Oh, that was not my smartest moment. Should I change the xml file to
>> move out a mo
I'll repair my work on the metadata.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:35 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Group 2 is for groups podlings that started in months such as
> November. First report would be December.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> https://infra.apache.org/officers/webreq
I tried:
Missing https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tamaya/site/index.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@i
ms build type' option?
>> >>>
>> >>> Drew
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Drew Farris
>> >>> drew.far...@gmail.com
>> >>> d...@apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> &g
Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until
discussed to 0. There's no minimum number of +1 votes.
I am always prepared to be corrected.
Back when I was trying to be the chair of this operation, we (ChrisM &
I & others) had a lovely old food fight about Chris M's proposal. It
seems to me that the fundamental situation as I saw it remains: this
is a proposal to the board to dissolve the IPMC and replace it with
something else. And ju
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Are we top posting now?
>
> My comments below Ross’
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> As a participant, I have two concerns about a player-mentor requirement.
>>
>> 1. Sustainability. In many ways, it is
I'd like to look at this through a lens of failure analysis. How do
podlings fail? I see two main patterns.
1. Failure to build a community. These are the podlings that we find
adrift in space with the lights on but no one home on the mailing
list.
2. Failure to build an _Apache_ community. These
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Please note the change of subject.
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> On 12/19/2014 02:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>>>
>>> What it would do however if we simply did away with the notion of the
>>> IPMC/In
I plan to:
1. Ask the nifi community if they want to be experimental subjects. Can't
expect IRB approval without it.
2. Write a proposal for the board to read. There are a number of details to
worry over. Any suggestions about where to put it? There in no board wiki.
Is there?
3. Submit a board
ience Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Benson Margulies
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 at 11:12 AM
> To:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> +1 to everything Ross said below and I monitored that experiment
> as well but was unaware of the 3 incidents, etc.
>
> As for pTLPs and shifting mentorship, etc., I trust Ross’s judgement
> but think we need more data on this acro
Every PMC member of a running PMC has a responsibility to keep an eye
out for crazy commits. Once this is reflected in the doc, it's good
practice for PPMC members.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed Dec 31 2
mmenting on this thread to focus on it would
>> > be that: arguing for potential downsides.
>> >
>> > With that, I'd like to thank all of my IPMC colleagues for
>> > this great opportunity and wish all of you the Happiest
>> > New Year!
>> >
I'd like to raise a topic directly related to the succession. To
start, three cheers for Roman for all his hard work!
For all other projects in the Foundation, we say, 'The chair is just a
clerk who facilitates communications with the board.' Here at the
IPMC, we expect the chair to be moderator o
Marvin,
I did go away. I came back to help with a podling, and fell into a
conversation started by discontented board members. You might push
back on the board, formally, and challenge them to either officially
be discontented or leave the iPMC alone. Me, I have an idea for a
proposal that might m
For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2.
The goal of this exercise is to turn the idea of the pTLP into a
practical alternative. By 'practical', I mean: 'based on the
constraints as I see them'; the board and comdev are not going to find
a li
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
>>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> ...This scheme locates
>> that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board
>> by supervising the pTLPs. They aren't
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies
>>> wrote
Back in 2013, I suggested asking the Champion to accept a very clear
level of reporting responsibility: to write a sentence or two _every
month_ or find someone else to do it. That's one person whom I wanted
to ask to sign up, for the duration of an incubation, to pay enough
attention to be able to
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> WTF? There have been presentations about the apache way at every ApacheCon
> for about 15 years (twice in most years). I personally give 5-10 such
> presentations a year (sometimes public sometimes
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Chip is correct. The tools we use in board meetings make it easy for us to
> see how many PMC members in a TLP resolution are members. If there are not
> enough we will sometimes put the project on a
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> To be clear my email was not targeted at Marvin. We all know how hard
> Marvin has worked to create the clear policy documents I talk about here. I
> hope Marvin knows me well enough to recognize my
The temperature of this might be reduced by replacing, 'no one knows what
the Apache Way is' with 'a lot of us have trouble translate it into
practical decisions in a repeatable fashion.' Or not.
As reported here, we have performed multiple experiments in which multiple
members, directors, and oth
Does it help anything to look at this, again, as failure modes?
One failure mode is a project that emerges from the incubator showing,
well, gross signs that it 'doesn't get it.'
Another failure mode is that a group of people who really do get it, at the
level of the broad principles, get into tr
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >> I think a better analogy would be "US Culture". Yes it is as nebulous
> >> as it gets, but the fact that US Constitut
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Relating to IncubatorV2 and pTLP proposals - on Apache Commons I seem
> to have spurred a discussion about making sub-mailing lists (And thus
> forming sub-communities) - but keep the formalities on the general
> list.
>
> (email below
I'm in the odd situation of not particularly wanting to argue in favor
of the proposal I wrote, yet finding it hard to resist the provocation
of messages that appear, to me, to misunderstand it. So I'll restrict
myself to the following, and I won't reply to any further dispute.
Anyone else is welco
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.01.2015 17:16, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>> I agree with Bertrand. Note whoever commits the patch is doing so under
>> their ICLA.
>
> Really? That can't be right: one can't become the author of a change
> (and therefore can't
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote:
>>> How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by
>>> removing inac
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> ...They are reporting to the Board. We know what inactivity looks like. So we
>> ask the PMC to fix it, or we shut them down
>
> I know how that works, it's just that with your
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> There are a few things that I would suggest for "next steps":
>
> 1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
> want to involve board@ when you have your first draft done. This will also
> start the discussion among
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque
>>
>> So you mean all TLPs should have status labels
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked (for both release artefacts):
> - signatures and hashes all good
> - incubating in source package name
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good (but complex!)
> - NOTICE has correct year
> - no unexpected b
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, jan i wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I am a bit confused about the mangling of license/notice files in respect
> of the source/binary releases.
>
> Can I please ask you to make a clear distinction between source and binary
> (which is not official ASF release) in the ne
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:44 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Is there a "standard" within the incubator about how we go about
> getting the appropriate forms filled out when we want to incubate a
> project from GitHub? GitHub fosters a sort of fly-by contribution
> model (and that's a good thing), but
granting
a license, but we also require that code that 'moves into' Apache some
with some expression of positive intent on the part of the
author/copyright owner.
>
> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:44 AM, James C
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
wrote:
> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
>> wrote:
>> > Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
>>
&g
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 1:05:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
>> > wrote
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I missed a few important points in this thread last week, with which I
> disagree:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> ...1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
>> want to
m/tinkerpop/tinkerpop3/graphs/contributors
>
>
>
> On 02/02/2015 09:53 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 8:09:43 AM Hadrian Zbarcea
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/01/2015 03:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Since the only official release is the source release, perhaps that's
the only place where we in fact need a policy?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>
>> I think formally the requirement is just that there is
An Apache project may not manage a codebase outside of Apache. Some people
who happen to be members of an Apache community can maintain code outside
of Apache, if they are very clear in distinguishing; it must not be a
product of the project. See 'Apache Extras'.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Je
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > At this point, I would like to open this document for soliciting as
> > wide a feedback as possible. I would like to especially request
> > attention of the ASF board members who ask
JimJag, for years, has written about the cultural implications of
DVCS, and the email here supports what he's written. So I think we
need to pay close attention.
I think that we care about both PMC and committer inventory. I, for
one, would not want to see an Apache project that restricted commit
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Perhaps you might consider asking Maven questions on a Maven list? If
you peruse the Maven dev list, you'll find an ongoing conversation.
>
>> On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:13, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.03.2015 22:38, schrieb Stephen Con
You may think that the discussion has died down, but perhaps recall
the lesson of NiFi. Or not, it might not strike you as applicable.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>>... Starting the vote on the propos
If a single legal entity has the copyright, the entity makes a grant.
If the code was built by a large community under the apache license,
there's no one to make a grant. 'The community' expressing its desire
to move to Apache is enough. This is an edge case of the principle
that we only accept cod
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> And that covers us from a legal standpoint? Is there anything
> "special"' about this situation that makes this appropriate?
There is nothing legal to cover here. Since all the code is AL 2.0,
legally, we are fine. The grant is (a) a bit of
I submitted the form, but I then need to replace myself with tkurc as a
mod. Can I do that sans-jira?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Gavin,
>
> Appreciate your help. I am doing exactly what you asked and following
> the trail of guidance.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Apr 1
Writing as a member and a mentor, I think that the NiFi podling will
do fine without the 'usual' ASF member that Bertrand is asking about.
However, because I think they'll do fine, I'll sign up if it makes
people more comfy, secure in my belief that I will be a maytag
repairman.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2
Sean sure makes more sense than me.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Sean is one of those folks i referred to. Id be an easy +1
> On Jun 12, 2015 9:24 AM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
>
>> As Sean says he's been engaged with the project while acting as mentor,
>> IMHO beyond mento
I've used crucible. It's horrible. And it comes from Atlassian, which
means that infra@ is predisposed against it, as their general feeling
is that the Atlassian products are very heavy.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.
With the graduation of NiFi I depart, at least for now.
Thanks for all the fish.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552284#comment-13552284
]
Benson Margulies commented on INCUBATOR-125:
I have some quest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13177402#comment-13177402
]
Benson Margulies commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
601 - 697 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
