Using GPLv3 in the build?

2019-01-09 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, I just double checked the text on the GPLv3 compatibility. Stupid thing is the problem I’m having isn’t really covered by that [1]. The case I’m currently having is that there is a toolset called Kaitai [2], which sounds interesting for the Apache PLC4X project. In general you define a d

Re: Using GPLv3 in the build?

2019-01-09 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
Hi Chris, This seems to be a similar situation as for tools such as automake (which I believe is used by several Apache projects). To the best of my knowledge (I am not a lawyer), the the copyleft clause of the GPLv3 does not impose and restrictions on the output of tools under the license. E.

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2019-01-09 Thread Lars Francke
Gris, sorry for the late reply. I'm only now catching up on emails after the holidays. Thanks for your support! The next steps are for me (in the next two weeks) to write an official proposal. I'll then start a [DISCUSS] Thread and will gather interested parties. We can take it from there. I beli

Re: Using GPLv3 in the build?

2019-01-09 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok ... so that was quick, I looked up the guy doing most of the commits and asked him. Here his reply: "As with majority of the compilers (gcc, clang, etc), Kaitai Struct compiler does not make any special takes on the output. If you own the input, you totally own the output, and free to specify

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-09 Thread Zach Kimberg
Hi Justin, I went through the license file to remove all licenses that no longer exist and tried to add any missing licenses I could find. I also tried to prune our rat-excludes for files that should be checked such as .js ones. As for your comments: - 3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt itself has four diffe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > As for your comments: > - 3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt itself has four different git submodules inside it > which is the cause of the number of different licenses. I added the main > license of each repo to our license file. Which probably misses the point I was trying to make I think? It's not t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I assume you realise this would be a lot easier if the dependancies were not copied into the git tree (as mentioned in the link you posted) , but I assume there a reason for doing this that I’m not aware of. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-09 Thread kellen sunderland
For TensorRT I'd recommend we just remove the third party folder from onnx. I hope this would resolve most dependency license issues. We do not use any of the code in that folder. On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 9:08 PM Justin Mclean Hi, > > I assume you realise this would be a lot easier if the dependanc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.9.0-incubating-rc01

2019-01-09 Thread Li,De(BDG)
Hi, Does anyone help us to check and vote? Now we got two +1(binding). If needed we will cancel and call for next VOTE after fixed all issues which Willem and Justin mentioned. Best Regards, Reed On 2018/12/29 上午10:36, "Li,De(BDG)" wrote: >Hi Dave, > >I got it, thank you very much. Have a goo