Hi, > As for your comments: > - 3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt itself has four different git submodules inside it > which is the cause of the number of different licenses. I added the main > license of each repo to our license file.
Which probably misses the point I was trying to make I think? It's not the main license you need to list but the licenses of all pieces of software in that bundle. There's 3rd party software bundled the release that isn’t listed in the LICENSE. > For the CC-BY-SA content, we raised the issue on legal-discuss ( > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox/%3CCAK1xzDdw_5-znx=y2wxvlwq_nk4ajmtfuqhp3dhr94wumqd...@mail.gmail.com%3E) > and it seems to be somewhat acceptable for documentation similarly to how > it is allowed for media. This has come up again recently and "it's tough one" [1] (See option 3). I think it would be safer to remove it from the release or replace it with a file with a pointer to the documentation. Thanks, Justin 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0f0e6cced863755b27e2bfe9e74d6abc922ba4e1912062132272833f@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
