Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-22 Thread sebb
On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg wrote: >> Even though there is no >> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. > > > Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during the voting > process and ca

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-22 Thread Mark Struberg
Hmm, well, but that usually only happens if it is clear that the vote should get cancelled. LieGrue, strub > Am 22.10.2017 um 15:29 schrieb sebb : > > On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> Even though there is no >>> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the g

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-22 Thread sebb
On 22 October 2017 at 17:53, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hmm, well, but that usually only happens if it is clear that the vote should > get cancelled. Isn't that what I wrote? > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 22.10.2017 um 15:29 schrieb sebb : >> >> On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-22 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) One improvement to consider for the next release is appending the license for Knockout (MIT) to the embedded LICENSE in the build ko4j jar artifact, as is required for distributing this artifact. And another is maybe generating a more explicit artifact name for ko4j. Thanks, Ate O