On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: >> Even though there is no >> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. > > > Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during the voting > process and casts -1. > A -1 always should come with good arguments. > Usually that leads to the others (who already voted) review this argument. > And if it turns out to really be a problem which the others have simply > overlooked, then they often amend their vote to a -1 as well.
Or the RM can just cancel the vote if it's obvious that the problem is sufficiently serious. I don't think there is any need for additional -1 votes in that case. > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 21.10.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org>: >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >> >> It is technically both with nuances. Time and 3 binding +1s plus a majority >> +1s. The 72 hours is a participation enabler. The 3 bindings is the minimum >> required, but a majority -1s would be a big deal. Even though there is no >> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. >> >> Wade >> >> >> >> On Oct 21, 2017 08:55, "Geertjan Wielenga" <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding >>> votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator. >>> >>> How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e., >>> at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding >>> votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of >>> Apache NetBeans is approved? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gj >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 IPMC binding >>>> >>>> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good. >>>> >>>> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with >>>> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors. >>>> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different: >>>> >>>> >>>> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator >>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http. >>> server.NetworkListener >>>> start >>>> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572] >>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer >>> start >>>> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started. >>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 >>> sec >>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org. >>> netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx) >>>> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec <<< FAILURE! >>>> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting: >>>> null actual: Last >>>> at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217) >>>> at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest. >>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622) >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73) >>>> >>>> >>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 >>> sec >>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx) Time elapsed: 0.067 sec <<< >>>> FAILURE! >>>> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException: >>>> java.lang.NullPointerException >>>> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_ >>>> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156) >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>> at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71) >>>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source) >>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>> at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275) >>>> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$ >>>> 60(Utilities.java:94) >>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >>>> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext( >>>> Utilities.java:94) >>>> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method) >>>> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115) >>>> at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn. >>> invokeImpl( >>>> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418) >>>> >>>> Failed tests: >>>> KOFx.run:73 ยป JS netscape.javascript.JSException: >>>> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti... >>>> >>>> >>>> Running the build for the forth time made it succeed. >>>> I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test >>>> setup. >>>> >>>> >>>> txs for rolling the release! >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >>>>> >>>>> Here's my +1 to release. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >>>>> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach >>>>>> <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator >>>>>>> PMC vote to release:.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)= >>>>>> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c >>>>>> >>>>>> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in >>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
