Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> A simple question regarding the SGA... at the bottom there's "List of
> software and other intellectual property covered by this agreement:".
> I wonder if we should have "Freemarker" under that,...
The best by far is to prepare archives
2015-06-08 17:41 GMT+02:00 David Nalley :
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Cédric Champeau
> wrote:
> > We are not using the Apache CI servers for that but our own CI server.
> IMHO
> > you should make a difference between building and checking. Building
> should
> > be automated as much as poss
Justin
Thanks for looking into this. The MPL license was used by pnotify. We
removed it as part of JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-316, but we didn¹t update the
LICENSE.txt file. Is it okay to remove the license text from the file
during our next release or is it a blocker for th
Thanks for the feedback Justin!
We are updating the LICENSE file as part of this jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-764 and we will spin up a new
RC once this is reviewed and committed.
Coming to your other suggestions
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
Changing my vote to +1 binding
> The MPL license was used by pnotify. We removed it as part of JIRA
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-316, but we didn¹t update the
> LICENSE.txt file. Is it okay to remove the license text from the file
> during our next release or is it a blocker
+1
From: Selvamohan Neethiraj
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 1:43 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.0 (incubating)
The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Ranger 0.5.0 (
My compliments to Justin for catching this and for the community for
(nearly) resolving this even before.
Well done all round.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changing my vote to +1 binding
>
> > The MPL license was used by pnotify. We removed it as part of JIRA
Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
+1 (binding)
Julian
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:08 AM, Li Yang wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified hash and signature.
> Compiled on Win7 64bit, JDK 1.7.0_51
> Unit test has known issue on Win7, but fine on Mac.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Henry
Hi,
> - Release candidates section[2]("It is traditional that release managers
> use their Apache home space to make available release candidates. ..”)
That used to be the case a few years back but is no longer the case see [1] and
for TLP [2]. That page needs be updated.
Thanks,
Justin
1. htt
+1 binding.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:50 PM, general@incubator.apache.org
wrote:
My compliments to Justin for catching this and for the community for
(nearly) resolving this even before.
Well done all round.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changing my vote to +
So, I hate to bring this up, but I think we're at a stalemate for the
sentry podling for this month. We tend to not include a podlings report if
there are no mentor sign offs. It seems like the mentors aren't inclined
to sign off based on some of the issues that have popped up.
On Mon, Jun 8, 20
We can omit (my tendency) or publish with notes. I think just including a
note saying that there was an issue on Sentry that is being dealt with
aggressively and which will be reported on monthly for a bit is
sufficient. The board needs to know that they know everything they need to
know. A half
12 matches
Mail list logo
