On 01/22/2013 12:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>
>Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly released. But
those*models* have been contributed to Apache cTAKES.
>
>This is the primary mechanism for distribution of th
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> ...should i cancel and re open the vote with the
> updated paragraph?...
I suggest that you just reply to this message with the modified
version of that first paragraph that you suggest, and wait 24 hours in
case anyone complains - t
2013/1/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
> > ...should i cancel and re open the vote with the
> > updated paragraph?...
>
> I suggest that you just reply to this message with the modified
> version of that first paragraph that you suggest
> -Original Message-
> From: general-return-39344-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:general-return-39344-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Jörn Kottmann
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:25 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [
Regarding the NOTICE file,
- the NOTICE files that are not in the root directory are out of date. I will
remove those.
- since we cannot include compiled jars in the (source) release, I assume we
should remove entries in the NOTICE file that correspond to jars that are being
removed from the
