> -----Original Message----- > From: general-return-39344-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > [mailto:general-return-39344-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org] > On Behalf Of Jörn Kottmann > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:25 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > On 01/22/2013 12:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Masanz, James J.<masanz.ja...@mayo.edu> > wrote: > >> > > >> >Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly > released. But those*models* have been contributed to Apache cTAKES. > >> > > >> >This is the primary mechanism for distribution of these models. > > This discussion has come up before with SpamAssassin and OpenNLP. > > > > The exception for SpamAssassin, as I have understood it, is that there > > is a place where all members of the community have access to the > > source texts behind the models. At OpenNLP, again according to my > > memory, the solution is to treat the models as not part of the release > > at all. > > > Yes, thats right, OpenNLP does not release any models at Apache. There is > a page over at SourceForge where people can download them and to help the > people who need to train them self we release the corpora specific > training code as part of the OpenNLP release. > > > > I fear that cTakes needs to have an interaction with LEGAL to adopt > > the SpamAssassin model, since, from a strict constructionist > > perspective, the source of the models is precisely what you cannot > > release. > > > As far as I understand it a part of the data is confidential and can't > be shared > with the community at all, is that right?
Yes, much of the training data for the models is confidential and cannot be shared with the community. -- James > > Jörn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
