Looking back over the email trail, it seems that there is some confusion as
when certain projects need to report. ManifoldCF, for instance, was asked to
report monthly for approximately the first year (or was it six months?). After
that we received report notices every three months: March, Jun
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:55 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
>> of the graduated podlings.
>>
>> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are
>> missing:
>
...
>> Should redirects be added
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:24 AM, wrote:
> Can you please clarify what our responsibilities in fact are, as far as you
> understand it? If we are once again expected to report every month, we'd
> appreciate receiving appropriate notification to that effect.
The expectations are that you report
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
> RAT was discussing graduation, but still needs to report.
Apologies. For podlings looking to graduate soon, monthly reporting is
probably a good idea but I missed that Rat had move
Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-service-diagnostics.html
Thank you.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
>> of the graduated podlings.
>>
>> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are
>> missing:
>
> [ snip ]
>
>> Should redirects
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
>> Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because
>> people do not completely follow the documentation that
>> has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There is a lot
>> of untidiness after graduation.
>
> +1
>
> Is ther
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-service-diagnostics.html
Approval is by lazy consensus. If anyone has any comments, please jump in.
Robert
--
Hi,
The Kato project reported in Secptember, as per our schedule. Our next
report is due in December, not October.
regards,
Stuart
On 18/10/11 18:05, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-8
ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
(also managed to do a release, tho
On 19 October 2011 09:44, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>>> Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because
>>> people do not completely follow the documentation that
>>> has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There
On 19 October 2011 09:40, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
>>> of the graduated podlings.
>>>
>>> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; th
On 19 October 2011 01:18, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>>
>> At present, clutch.py generates the output HTML directly.
>
> To clarify for others (i know that sebb knows):
> It generates the whole xml into site-author, using some
> fragments of html that are hard-coded in the clutch.py code.
Three cheers for sebb, David, and Christian - and others - for really
making amazing improvements in the incubator website!
- Shane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On 10/12/2011 10:08 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
version 0.1-incubating. I've received two binding IPMC +1 votes and 4
non-binding +1 votes. The blockers identified by Marvin and sebb should
be fixed in this release. I need one more
> Keep in mind the board meeting isn't until
> next week, so there's still time to address
> the missingreports.
<> We had the meeting date wrong, too. When did October move to the
4th week? And I have no idea when the November meeting will be, since there
are two dates in there (7th and 16th).
The board@ rescheduled the meeting
at the beginning of this month. The
second round of nags had the date right;
the first round didn't.
Nov 7 is perhaps the board's face-to-face
meeting in Vancouver. I would expect the 16th
to be the date for Nov PMC reports to be submitted,
but just an educated
Joe is correct: 7-Nov is the Board F2F at an offsite location during the
Monday of ApacheCon.
The normal November meeting, where we'd expect monthly reports, is on
the 16th as normal.
The October meeting was indeed moved somewhat late, but I was hoping
no-one else would mind having a couple
17 matches
Mail list logo
